I thought that after -M4 will come 7.0.0.
People suggested to release -M5 too...
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Nick Pratt wrote:
> So what's the intended last phase before we announce 7.0 and freeze the
> API?
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
>
> > There won't be R
So what's the intended last phase before we announce 7.0 and freeze the API?
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> There won't be RC phase.
> There is no difference between RC1 and 7.0.0.
> Both do not allow API breaks. Fixing bugs and adding features/improvements
> are the sa
There won't be RC phase.
There is no difference between RC1 and 7.0.0.
Both do not allow API breaks. Fixing bugs and adding features/improvements
are the same for both. So there is no point in releasing candidates.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On M
Maybe I'm wrong but it doesn't look an heavy changeI think it falls
in the acceptable category described by Martijn.
My best solution would be to discuss API breaks on a case by case basis.
If breaks happen on a minor part of our API, I am not against them,
even if they are late in the game.
Breaking APIs should be ok until we hit the RC phase - otherwise things
like this wont be able to be changed until Wicket 8.0.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5833 I propose to add a
> new
> method to
> org.apache.
My best solution would be to discuss API breaks on a case by case basis.
If breaks happen on a minor part of our API, I am not against them,
even if they are late in the game. Say if they typically would break 1
class or at most 10 classes in a large application (100+ pages). So
IChoiceRenderer wo
It also depends on how much work it would be to implement the interface method.
Martijn
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> My best solution would be to discuss API breaks on a case by case basis.
>
> If breaks happen on a minor part of our API, I am not against them,
> ev
