Re: wicket 2.0 ideas

2011-07-22 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
https://github.com/jdonnerstag/wicket/commit/e5150ecb58fb9617120911b3b984767009f9f9d6 -Juergen On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: I don't see any commit message related to autoadd at https://github.com/jdonnerstag/wicket/commits/autoadd Can you give

Re: wicket 2.0 ideas

2011-07-21 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
I gave the idea to resolve components after onInitalize() a try by re-using ComponentResolvers to resolve the auto-components. They are added (not queued) at the right place in the hierarchy. Component's queued will be added to the auto-components as well, so that the hierarchies (markup and

Re: wicket 2.0 ideas

2011-07-15 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, I don't have much experience with component/transparent resolvers but here is how I see it. On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: working with this wicket:for stuff makes me really hate all the autoresolver and autocomponent stuff. if only add() did

wicket 2.0 ideas

2011-07-14 Thread Igor Vaynberg
working with this wicket:for stuff makes me really hate all the autoresolver and autocomponent stuff. if only add() did what queue() from the component queueing discussions does we would be able to get rid of auto components and make them full fledged components instead. look at this: div