[vote] switch 1.5.x releases from milestones to RCs

2010-12-05 Thread Igor Vaynberg
i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough to release RCs. this vote is to make the next release RC1. vote ends Wednesday 5pm GMT+2 -igor

Re: [vote] switch 1.5.x releases from milestones to RCs

2010-12-05 Thread Igor Vaynberg
+1 -igor On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough to release RCs. this vote is to make the next release RC1. vote ends Wednesday 5pm GMT+2 -igor

Re: [vote] switch 1.5.x releases from milestones to RCs

2010-12-05 Thread Martin Grigorov
+1 On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote: i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough to release RCs. this vote is to make the next release RC1. vote ends Wednesday 5pm GMT+2 -igor

Re: [vote] switch 1.5.x releases from milestones to RCs

2010-12-05 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
+1 Juergen On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: +1 On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote: i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough to release RCs. this vote is to make the next release RC1. vote ends Wednesday 5pm

Wicket and OpenJdk

2010-12-05 Thread andrea del bene
Hi, I'm having some troubles trying to compile Wicket main trunk with OpenJdk under Ubuntu 10.10 64 bit. Is there any problem with this Java distribution? The compilation error a get is relative to class ResourceTestPage.java at

Re: Wicket and OpenJdk

2010-12-05 Thread Martin Grigorov
com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGImageEncoder.encode(BufferedImage) throws IOException with Oracle JDK it prints warning about the usage of com.sun.* On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:18 PM, andrea del bene andrea.on@libero.itwrote: Hi, I'm having some troubles trying to compile Wicket main trunk with

Re: Wicket and OpenJdk

2010-12-05 Thread Carl-Eric Menzel
Wicket won't compile with OpenJDK6. You have to use an 1.5 JDK. I had a proposal to use Maven-Toolchains to solve this, but now I'm using a custom mvn15 script that uses JDK1.5, like Martin Grigorov (I think) suggested. Maybe the JDK1.5 requirement ought to be documented somewhere. Carl-Eric

Re: Wicket and OpenJdk

2010-12-05 Thread Martin Grigorov
Compiling with Oracle JDK 1.6 works fine. Wicket 1.4/1.5 *have* to support JDK 1.5 so we can use anything specific for JDK 1.6. Andrea, I just changed it to catch Exception instead of IOException. Should be OK for OpenJDK now. On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Carl-Eric Menzel

Re: Wicket and OpenJdk

2010-12-05 Thread Carl-Eric Menzel
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:09:55 +0100 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Compiling with Oracle JDK 1.6 works fine. That's interesting. I thought Oracle and OpenJDK were (at least for now) compatible. Wicket 1.4/1.5 *have* to support JDK 1.5 so we can use anything specific for JDK 1.6.

Re: Wicket and OpenJdk

2010-12-05 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote: Compiling with Oracle JDK 1.6 works fine. Wicket 1.4/1.5 *have* to support JDK 1.5 so we can use anything specific for JDK 1.6. Read as ...can not use .. Andrea, I just changed it to catch Exception instead of

Re: Wicket and OpenJdk

2010-12-05 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Carl-Eric Menzel cmen...@wicketbuch.dewrote: On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:09:55 +0100 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Compiling with Oracle JDK 1.6 works fine. That's interesting. I thought Oracle and OpenJDK were (at least for now) compatible.

Re: Wicket and OpenJdk

2010-12-05 Thread andrea del bene
According to this post http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6527962 package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg is not part of standard Java platform and is not supported by OpenJdk. On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:09:55 +0100 Martin Grigorovmgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Compiling with Oracle JDK

Re: [vote] switch 1.5.x releases from milestones to RCs

2010-12-05 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I'd like to at least provide html5 components out-of-the-box before we ship 1.5. Would be a drag explaining that we don't support type=email or type=url in our new version. Martijn On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote: i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough

Re: overriding isVisible bad?

2010-12-05 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
Igor, I agree that there are places that using onConfigure / setVisible may be better than overriding isVisible. However, I often have the following type of scenario, and wonder how you would suggest doing it without overriding isVisible: Situation: one component depends on the visibility of

Re: overriding isVisible bad?

2010-12-05 Thread Igor Vaynberg
afair this is already explained in the javadoc of onconfigure label { onconfigure() { link.onconfigure(); setvisible(link.isvisible()); }} -igor On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote: Igor,  I agree that there are places that using onConfigure /

Re: [vote] switch 1.5.x releases from milestones to RCs

2010-12-05 Thread Igor Vaynberg
you can always tweak it later, i dont think it will require api breaks. even if it is in 1.5.1. i dont think a lot of people are using html5 specific types yet, so while it is cool im not sure about the utility just yet. -igor On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Martijn Dashorst