i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough to release RCs. this vote is to
make the next release RC1.
vote ends Wednesday 5pm GMT+2
-igor
+1
-igor
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough to release RCs. this vote is to
make the next release RC1.
vote ends Wednesday 5pm GMT+2
-igor
+1
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough to release RCs. this vote is to
make the next release RC1.
vote ends Wednesday 5pm GMT+2
-igor
+1
Juergen
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough to release RCs. this vote is to
make the next release RC1.
vote ends Wednesday 5pm
Hi,
I'm having some troubles trying to compile Wicket main trunk with
OpenJdk under Ubuntu 10.10 64 bit. Is there any problem with this Java
distribution?
The compilation error a get is relative to class ResourceTestPage.java
at
com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGImageEncoder.encode(BufferedImage) throws
IOException
with Oracle JDK it prints warning about the usage of com.sun.*
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:18 PM, andrea del bene andrea.on@libero.itwrote:
Hi,
I'm having some troubles trying to compile Wicket main trunk with
Wicket won't compile with OpenJDK6. You have to use an 1.5 JDK. I had a
proposal to use Maven-Toolchains to solve this, but now I'm using a
custom mvn15 script that uses JDK1.5, like Martin Grigorov (I think)
suggested.
Maybe the JDK1.5 requirement ought to be documented somewhere.
Carl-Eric
Compiling with Oracle JDK 1.6 works fine.
Wicket 1.4/1.5 *have* to support JDK 1.5 so we can use anything specific
for JDK 1.6.
Andrea, I just changed it to catch Exception instead of IOException. Should
be OK for OpenJDK now.
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Carl-Eric Menzel
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:09:55 +0100
Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Compiling with Oracle JDK 1.6 works fine.
That's interesting. I thought Oracle and OpenJDK were (at least for now)
compatible.
Wicket 1.4/1.5 *have* to support JDK 1.5 so we can use anything
specific for JDK 1.6.
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
Compiling with Oracle JDK 1.6 works fine.
Wicket 1.4/1.5 *have* to support JDK 1.5 so we can use anything specific
for JDK 1.6.
Read as ...can not use ..
Andrea, I just changed it to catch Exception instead of
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Carl-Eric Menzel cmen...@wicketbuch.dewrote:
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:09:55 +0100
Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Compiling with Oracle JDK 1.6 works fine.
That's interesting. I thought Oracle and OpenJDK were (at least for now)
compatible.
According to this post
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6527962 package
com.sun.image.codec.jpeg is not part of standard Java platform and is
not supported by OpenJdk.
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:09:55 +0100
Martin Grigorovmgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Compiling with Oracle JDK
I'd like to at least provide html5 components out-of-the-box before we
ship 1.5. Would be a drag explaining that we don't support
type=email or type=url in our new version.
Martijn
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough
Igor,
I agree that there are places that using onConfigure / setVisible may be
better than overriding isVisible. However, I often have the following type
of scenario, and wonder how you would suggest doing it without overriding
isVisible:
Situation: one component depends on the visibility of
afair this is already explained in the javadoc of onconfigure
label { onconfigure() { link.onconfigure(); setvisible(link.isvisible()); }}
-igor
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Igor,
I agree that there are places that using onConfigure /
you can always tweak it later, i dont think it will require api
breaks. even if it is in 1.5.1. i dont think a lot of people are using
html5 specific types yet, so while it is cool im not sure about the
utility just yet.
-igor
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Martijn Dashorst
16 matches
Mail list logo