Re: Test ApacheLicenceHeaderTest fails

2010-12-18 Thread andrea del bene
Sorry, was a problem with my local repository. Now it works. Negative. All is fine here. On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:28 PM, andrea del benewrote: Hi everybody, with last code from main trunk I've got a failure with test org.apache.wicket.util.license.ApacheLicenceHeaderTest. Can anyone confirm

Re: Tester loses all submit parameters after ajax call

2010-12-18 Thread zkybar...@gmail.com
Pedro, One more thing, i have updated WicketTesterTest, which fails with issue i have described. I'm attaching patch file, maybe it will be of any help for you. On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 8:07 PM, zkybar...@gmail.com wrote: > Pedro, > > Thanks for reply. Yeah i have workaround for this - i just res

Re: Tester loses all submit parameters after ajax call

2010-12-18 Thread zkybar...@gmail.com
Pedro, Thanks for reply. Yeah i have workaround for this - i just reset submit parameters from last request to current request. On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Pedro Santos wrote: > Hi Zilvinas, I'm taking a look at your described issue, for now try to set > the parameter as a POST one. > > On

Re: Test ApacheLicenceHeaderTest fails

2010-12-18 Thread Martin Grigorov
Negative. All is fine here. On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:28 PM, andrea del bene wrote: > Hi everybody, > > with last code from main trunk I've got a failure with test > org.apache.wicket.util.license.ApacheLicenceHeaderTest. > > Can anyone confirm it? >

Re: Tester loses all submit parameters after ajax call

2010-12-18 Thread Pedro Santos
Hi Zilvinas, I'm taking a look at your described issue, for now try to set the parameter as a POST one. On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:15 PM, zkybar...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I'm experiencing strange behavior with WicketTester in 1.5 when using > FormTester with ajax events. It works as follow

Test ApacheLicenceHeaderTest fails

2010-12-18 Thread andrea del bene
Hi everybody, with last code from main trunk I've got a failure with test org.apache.wicket.util.license.ApacheLicenceHeaderTest. Can anyone confirm it?

Tester loses all submit parameters after ajax call

2010-12-18 Thread zkybar...@gmail.com
Hello, I'm experiencing strange behavior with WicketTester in 1.5 when using FormTester with ajax events. It works as follows: 1. Set some value via the FormTester to input field. 2. Invoke ajax event. In my case behaviour is AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior. 3. After the ajax event

Re: [DISCUSS 1.5] Rename IHeaderResponse to IResourceResponse (or similar)?

2010-12-18 Thread tetsuo
Unless you can think of a spectacularly better name, I think you should just keep IHeaderResponse. Tetsuo On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Juergen Donnerstag > wrote: >> I understand that IHeaderResponse is no longer accurate, but >>

Re: [DISCUSS 1.5] Rename IHeaderResponse to IResourceResponse (or similar)?

2010-12-18 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > I understand that IHeaderResponse is no longer accurate, but > IResourceResponse IMO would simply be wrong: it's not a response to a > resource. It contributes to a specific section of a response such as > Header or Footer Agreed. I ju

Re: [DISCUSS 1.5] Rename IHeaderResponse to IResourceResponse (or similar)?

2010-12-18 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > I understand that IHeaderResponse is no longer accurate, but > IResourceResponse IMO would simply be wrong: it's not a response to a > resource. It contributes to a specific section of a response such as > Header or Footer ImNotGoingInT

Re: [jira] Resolved: (WICKET-3218) Component#onInitialize is broken for Pages

2010-12-18 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Carl-Eric Menzel wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:05:01 -0500 (EST) > "Igor Vaynberg (JIRA)" wrote: > >> i made the decision to make the method final in page. i think this >> makes more sense then delaying the call because by the time the >> page's constructor is

Re: svn commit: r1050581 - in /wicket/trunk/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/resource/aggregation: AbstractDependencyRespectingResourceAggregatingHeaderResponse.java AbstractResourceAggregatingH

2010-12-18 Thread Martin Grigorov
And by the way there are two commits in 1.4.x which are not yet in 1.5: r1049685 r1050058 On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > I think it is fine in this particular case. > There is no ticket about it, i.e. no changelog entry, and since yesterday > it was not clear even to t

Re: svn commit: r1050581 - in /wicket/trunk/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/resource/aggregation: AbstractDependencyRespectingResourceAggregatingHeaderResponse.java AbstractResourceAggregatingH

2010-12-18 Thread Martin Grigorov
I think it is fine in this particular case. There is no ticket about it, i.e. no changelog entry, and since yesterday it was not clear even to the rest of us how to use it. I think this is not a good practice too ;-) On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote: > Any objections to m

Re: svn commit: r1050433 - in /wicket/trunk/wicket/src: main/java/org/apache/wicket/request/handler/render/ main/java/org/apache/wicket/util/tester/ test/java/org/apache/wicket/request/handler/

2010-12-18 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Jeremy, On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote: > A couple questions about this commit (inline): > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:01 AM, wrote: > > > Author: mgrigorov > > Date: Fri Dec 17 16:01:41 2010 > > New Revision: 1050433 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=10

Re: [DISCUSS 1.5] Rename IHeaderResponse to IResourceResponse (or similar)?

2010-12-18 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
I understand that IHeaderResponse is no longer accurate, but IResourceResponse IMO would simply be wrong: it's not a response to a resource. It contributes to a specific section of a response such as Header or Footer Juergen On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote: > With the inf