The Apache Woden Team is pleased to announce the release of Woden 1.0M9 .
The source and binary distributions are available for download at:
http://ws.apache.org/woden/dev/1.0/builds.html
Main features of this release.
1.) Woden moved to use clean Maven based module structure and removed
unneces
Hi Sagara,
Sorry for the delay. I had attached the patch for the issue (WODEN-228).
Now I am looking at other issues and would like start with WODEN-186. I am
able to reproduce the errors that Jeremy listed in the bug report. But I
guess I will have questions and wonder what is the good way to
Thanks. Day-job is kind of extreme today, so I'm kind of useless. This
solved the problem.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 February 2011 10:14:46 AM Benson Margulies wrote:
>> OK, as soon as I figure out how to download them from nexus I'll use
>> them to fi
On Wednesday 16 February 2011 10:14:46 AM Benson Margulies wrote:
> OK, as soon as I figure out how to download them from nexus I'll use
> them to finish setting up the dist dir.
How about:
wget --no-check-certificate -np -r -nH -L
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org
OK, as soon as I figure out how to download them from nexus I'll use
them to finish setting up the dist dir.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Veithen
wrote:
> Maven never generates checksums when installing artifacts into the
> local Maven repository (unless you explicitly tell it to do s
Maven never generates checksums when installing artifacts into the
local Maven repository (unless you explicitly tell it to do so). It
only does that when deploying to a remote repository. If Maven had not
generated appropriate checksums during the deployment, then Nexus
would not have allowed you
Benson,
On Wednesday 16 February 2011 9:12:24 AM Benson Margulies wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> I don't know what to do. The situation is worse than I reported in my
> recent email. The build didn't even make md5 signatures, I have no
> idea how or why. it made signatures and nothing else. I think th
Dear recipients,
I prepared a 2.0 release of Apache XML schema, and neither I nor
anyone else managed to notice that I somehow messed up the use of the
ASF shared POM so as to produce no MD5 or SHA1 files at all. The asc
files from my signature are there, but not checksums.
So, I suppose that I e
Jochen,
As per the message I just sent, it's grimmer than that. There are no
MD5's. I can't imagine how the maven build failed to produce them.
If it wasn't for that, I'd completely agree with you.
--benson
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> I don't think you need a 2.0
Colleagues,
I don't know what to do. The situation is worse than I reported in my
recent email. The build didn't even make md5 signatures, I have no
idea how or why. it made signatures and nothing else. I think that
this means that I need to work with infra to wipe the whole thing from
maven, then
I don't think you need a 2.0.1 release for that.
If I get you right, then what you are missing are some items that
constitute a complete binary distribution, aka zip file. There is,
IMO, no problem with packaging the released stuff into such a zip file
manually and putting that into the Apache dis
Folks,
Due to a misunderstanding between me and the ASF common parent POM,
the XmlSchema 2.0 release is a more spartan device than I anticipated.
It has a full set of source, binary, and javadoc for the actual jar
file of xmlschema-core. It does not have the traditional items aimed
at non-Maven u
We have 4 +1 votes and no others.
And I apologize if I veered into grumpiness on the discussion about
compatibility.
--benson
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Tom Jordahl wrote:
>> I further want to point out that the maintainers of the code consist
>> of me and some small contributions from o
Amila,
Right now I don't have any idea what could cause this, but I've added
a couple of assertions to the test case. This should give us some
information in which direction to search. Can you update your working
copy and post the Surefire report when the issue occurs again?
Andreas
On Tue, Feb
Hi Teemu
I unfortunately don't think you will get any answer to your question. If
you look a few days/weeks back (31. January), you will notice that I
asked the same question and didn't get an answer either, I however want
to enable for extensions using Jetty as the web server.
Lars
On 15-0
15 matches
Mail list logo
