ebernehmen.
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:45:38 +0200
> Subject: Re: [WODEN] Future of Woden Axiom implementation ?
> From: jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com
> To: dev@ws.apache.org
>
> Question: Are there any ongoing developments: If not, I'd say we leave
> the code and avoid anno
Question: Are there any ongoing developments: If not, I'd say we leave
the code and avoid annoying potential users.
Otherwise: If we might save work ourselves, drop it. (Don't forget to
increment the major version number and possibly change Maven GID and
package to indicate incompatible changes.)
Sound good, I will proceed with required changes.
Thanks !
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Andreas Veithen
wrote:
> I think it makes sense to remove the Axiom support. There are two
> reasons for that:
>
> 1. Axiom enables a couple of optimizations (deferred parsing,
> pull-through and sourced
I think it makes sense to remove the Axiom support. There are two
reasons for that:
1. Axiom enables a couple of optimizations (deferred parsing,
pull-through and sourced elements) that don't exist in DOM. However, I
don't see how Woden (or code that uses Woden) would benefit from these
optimizati
I'm certainly OK with this as it seems to make a lot of sense to me. That
said, not being a Woden user or anything, I'm not sure how many people use
Woden. You may want to post a note to the users@ list as a quick poll to
say "we're thinking of doing XYZ, how badly would you be affected" or
t facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> From: sagara.gunathu...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:56:32 +0530
> Subject: Re: [WODEN] Future of Woden Axiom implementation ?
> To: dev@ws.apache.org
>
>
Hi Sagara,
If you're correct that there are no current consumers of the Axiom impl of
Woden I think your proposal makes good sense. Best to focus the efforts of
the small number of active contributors on a code base that sees usage.
Lawrence
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Sagara Gunathunga <
onen und entfaltet keine
> rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von
> E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
>
>
>
>> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:12:38 -0400
>> From: deep...@gmail.com
>> To: dev@ws.apache.org
>> Subject:
Mails koennen wir keine Haftung
fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:12:38 -0400
> From: deep...@gmail.com
> To: dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [WODEN] Future of Woden Axiom implementation ?
>
> What is the status of WSDL 2.0 ? how many WS stacks use WSDL 2.
On Saturday, June 23, 2012, Deepal jayasinghe wrote:
> What is the status of WSDL 2.0 ? how many WS stacks use WSDL 2.0 ?.
WSDL 2.0 spec is kinda completed and became an official W3C recommendation
in 2007 but not widely adopted. AFAIK Axis2 is the only stack which support
for WSDL 2.0 fully.
Th
What is the status of WSDL 2.0 ? how many WS stacks use WSDL 2.0 ?.
Deepal
> Hi Devs,
>
> I'm thinking about future of Axiom (OM) based implementation of Woden
> API for sometime, whether we should continue or drop support from next
> release ?
>
> AFAIK original objective of OM implementation is
Hi Devs,
I'm thinking about future of Axiom (OM) based implementation of Woden
API for sometime, whether we should continue or drop support from next
release ?
AFAIK original objective of OM implementation is to support Axis2 but
in fact Axis2 never used OM implementation instead Axis2 still use
12 matches
Mail list logo
