On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Dharshana Warusavitharana
dharsha...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
We are currently working on $subject.
The plan is to integrate the feature of running all integration tests
against user mode and tenant mode in to Clarity framework.
This will allow us to
Hi,
Please find the API Manager 1.0.1- Milestone 1 build at [1].
This includes several performance wise improvements and some bug fixes.
Please report any issues found in this milestone pack at [2].
[1] http://builder3.us1.wso2.org/builds/Oct8-r145010/wso2am-1.0.1.zip
[2]
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:
---
Test set: TestSuite
---
Tests run: 115, Failures: 1, Errors:
---
Carbon Snapshot Orbit #203 was successful.
---
This build was triggered at the scheduled time of 12:00 AM
(UserRealm) realmService.getTenantUserRealm(tenantId); is returning null.
Who is looking into this?
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Kishanthan Thangarajah kishant...@wso2.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm working on $subject to package all product integration tests as a
distribution and make it available to run OOB with any platform (Stratos or
product).
So the users can download the distribution then point it to product or
Stratos setup and run. This will reduce the time taken to setup
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
(UserRealm) realmService.getTenantUserRealm(tenantId); is returning null.
Who is looking into this?
Dimuthu is looking into this. I did some debugging and noticed realmService
was returning the realm properly. It looked like
Did some debugging and it seems it has been broken by a recent commit to
GhostRegistry, sent another not to dev too .. Eranda please have a look ..
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently looking into this.
thanks
Eranda
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Muhammed Shariq sha...@wso2.com wrote:
Did some debugging and it seems it has been broken by a recent commit to
GhostRegistry, sent another not to dev too .. Eranda please have a look ..
On Tue, Oct 9,
---
Carbon Snapshot Kernel #461 failed.
---
This build occurred because it is a dependant of
WSO2CARBON-CARBONKERNELBUILD-203.
No failed tests found, a
Is $subject a known issue? This is from ESB 4.5.0 + DSS service hosting
features installed.
[2012-10-09 13:54:07,369] WARN - DeploymentInterceptor The service
artifact of the DTSample service group has changed. Removing all registry
entries and handling this as a new service addition.
Hi Kishan,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Kishanthan Thangarajah
kishant...@wso2.comwrote:
Is $subject a known issue? This is from ESB 4.5.0 + DSS service hosting
features installed.
This is actually not an issue, it is the expected behavior, when the data
service is modified, it's
Hi Eranda,
The following commit is breaking tenant login and is a blocker at the
moment. It seems you are setting the RealmService to null explicitly which
is causing the issue .. can you please have a look and fix this ASAP ..
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:05 PM, era...@wso2.com wrote:
Author:
This will be a very important addition to the automation framework which
will help to launch tests against any setup easily. Thanks Krishantha.
/Charitha
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera
krishan...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm working on $subject to package all product
---
WSO2 Carbon BRANCH Platform_4.0.2 #455 failed.
---
Code has been updated by asela, hasini, deep, amilam, buddhikac.
3/1711 tests failed, no failures were
All CEP tests were passed even after build in a clean repo.
Thanks,
Krishantha.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera krishan...@wso2.com
wrote:
Test was successful with latest CEP build. But need to double check with
clean repo build.
Thanks,
Krishantha.
On Mon, Oct
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Pradeep Fernando prad...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
I want to define an RXT type and then define a new lifecycle and make
sure
all RXT instances that I create are associated with the LC and
I do not see these failures with clean repo build. Test execution is still
in progress.
Thanks,
Krishantha.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:
Report attached. There are thousands of tests and about 250 has failed.
--
*Amila Maharachchi*
Technical
Hi KasunG,
See [1], ws-sec policies (assymetric binding policy) are attached at HTTP
binding level in addition to SOAP11 and SOAP12 bindings, which is wrong.
(Not a regression bug in 4.0.1, we can fix this later if this does not
affect functionality)
[1]https://wso2.org/jira/browse/WSAS-1083
Hi Supun,
Please do $Subject. It is still having 4.0.0 jars.
Regards,
AmilaM.
--
*Amila Maharachchi*
Technical Lead
Member, Management Committee - Cloud Platform TG
WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
Blog: http://maharachchi.blogspot.com
Mobile: +94719371446
---
WSO2 Carbon BRANCH Platform_4.0.2 #456 failed.
---
Code has been updated by asela, damitha, amilam, buddhikac.
3/1712 tests failed, no failures were new.
Tests in error:
testSteps(org.wso2.carbon.service.mgt.TestPolicyUtil):
org.wso2.carbon.context.internal.CarbonContextDataHolder$MultitenantCarbonCacheManager.getLocalCache(Ljava/lang/String;)Lnet/sf/jsr107cache/Cache;
testSteps(org.wso2.carbon.service.mgt.TestServiceGroupAdmin):
Hi Eranda,
This is still there. Refer to samisa's mail in dev@ as well.
Tests in error:
testSteps(org.wso2.carbon.service.mgt.TestServiceGroupAdmin):
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi samisa,
Eranda was working on this. Looks like the issue is not fixed yet. Replied
to the other thread regarding this.
Guys, we are running out of time on this. We need the fix ASAP.
thanks,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012
Hi samisa,
Eranda was working on this. Looks like the issue is not fixed yet. Replied
to the other thread regarding this.
thanks,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
These are the commits, and does not seem like any of those broke it,
unless it is a
Folks, we need an urgent fix to this. Looks like a caching issue.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Tests in error:
testSteps(org.wso2.carbon.service.mgt.TestPolicyUtil):
Hi,
Attaching the patch.
thanks,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Supun,
Please do $Subject. It is still having 4.0.0 jars.
Regards,
AmilaM.
--
*Amila Maharachchi*
Technical Lead
Member, Management Committee - Cloud Platform TG
WSO2,
Fixed the two failure, all tests were successful in clean repo build.
Thanks,
Krishantha.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Dinusha Senanayaka dinu...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Amila,
will check this.. Already there is a carbon JIRA reported for this.
Regards,
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:55 PM,
Hi Supun,
There is nothing to do with the registry core related thing here. This is
one test failure result of change of CCtx which can be fix by adding the
following dependency to the pom.
dependency
groupIdorg.wso2.carbon/groupId
---
WSO2 Carbon BRANCH Platform_4.0.2 #457 failed.
---
This build occurred because it is a dependant of WCB001-KER000-272.
7/1703 tests failed, 4 failures were
Hi Eranda,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Supun,
There is nothing to do with the registry core related thing here. This is
one test failure result of change of CCtx which can be fix by adding the
following dependency to the pom.
dependency
Hi Supun,
This was fixed in commit revision 145134.
Yes. I reported the below error in the other thread. I had already said
that it occurs after adding caching.core 4.0.2 as a dependency. However I
didn't commit that change since the code was frozen and it wasn't a
complete fix. I believe
---
WSO2 Carbon BRANCH Platform_4.0.2 #458 failed.
---
This build occurred because it is a dependant of WCB001-KER000-273.
3/1713 tests failed, no failures
Guys, do we have a fix for this or what?
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Supun,
This was fixed in commit revision 145134.
Yes. I reported the below error in the other thread. I had already said
that it occurs after adding caching.core 4.0.2
---
WSO2 Carbon BRANCH Platform_4.0.2 #459 failed.
---
Code has been updated by eranda, amilam.
No failed tests found, a possible compilation error.
09-Oct-2012 16:06:17[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) on
project org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.gateway: Error occurred in starting fork,
check output in log - [Help 1]09-Oct-2012 16:06:17[ERROR] Failed to
execute goal on project
Hi,
I'm looking to this.
Thanks;
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
09-Oct-2012 16:06:17 [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) on
project org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.gateway: Error occurred in
Hi Samisa,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Guys, do we have a fix for this or what?
Its already fixed.
thanks
Eranda
*
*
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Samisa,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.comwrote:
Guys, do we have a fix for this or what?
Its already fixed.
Thanks, and please update the threads once you fix...
thanks
Running TestSuite
Configuring TestNG with:
org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.conf.TestNGMapConfigurator@54fc9944
[2012-10-10 08:05:21,246] INFO
{org.wso2.carbon.integration.framework.utils.TestUtil} - Copying
INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 1:16:40.444s
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Oct 09 20:15:39 PDT 2012
[INFO] Final Memory: 2613M/3601M
[INFO]
Hi All,
There's an inconsistency in the documentation at
http://docs.wso2.org/wiki/display/ESB450/Endpoint+Error+Handling
What's the correct timeout setting, action or responseAction ?
--
Thanks regards,
Nirmal
Software Engineer- Platform Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc.
Mobile: +94715779733
I am looking into this.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 1:16:40.444s
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Oct 09 20:15:39 PDT 2012
[INFO]
Amani provided a fix and I have tried it and committed now.
Pls svn up components/logging and features/logging-mgt.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
I didnt come across this while building. But the logging summarizer build
break was there and now it is fixed.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Lalaji Sureshika lal...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to this.
Thanks;
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe
I see some modules as 'SKIPPED' in the middle of the list. Normally if a
module breaks the build, build should stop and all the modules scheduled
after that should be skipped. Isn't it the way bamboo is configured. Do we
allow to go ahead on build breaks?
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Bamboo
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.comwrote:
I didnt come across this while building. But the logging summarizer build
break was there and now it is fixed.
Yes,I tried with my local m2 repo as well.I also able to build gateway
component successfully.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.comwrote:
I see some modules as 'SKIPPED' in the middle of the list. Normally if a
module breaks the build, build should stop and all the modules scheduled
after that should be skipped. Isn't it the way bamboo is configured. Do
Tests in error:
testCacheManager(net.sf.ehcache.spring.SpringIntegrationTest)
--
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
* http://www.apache.org/**
email: **az...@wso2.com* az...@wso2.com* cell: +94 77
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Tests in error:
testCacheManager(net.sf.ehcache.spring.SpringIntegrationTest)
I build this morning updated, and did not get such error. What svn revision
are you in?
--
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture; WSO2,
Hi Azeez,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Tests in error:
testCacheManager(net.sf.ehcache.spring.SpringIntegrationTest)
Just checked. It is passing in my environment (145137). Please can I have
the sure-fire report?
thanks,
dimuthu
--
*Afkham
Hi Nirmal,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All,
There's an inconsistency in the documentation at
http://docs.wso2.org/wiki/display/ESB450/Endpoint+Error+Handling
What's the correct timeout setting, action or responseAction ?
Correct one is
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Isuru Udana isu...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Nirmal,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All,
There's an inconsistency in the documentation at
http://docs.wso2.org/wiki/display/ESB450/Endpoint+Error+Handling
What's the
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.comwrote:
I see some modules as 'SKIPPED' in the middle of the list. Normally if a
module breaks the build, build should stop and all the modules
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.comwrote:
I see some modules as 'SKIPPED' in the middle of the list. Normally if a
module breaks the build, build should stop and all the modules
Thanks. If the dependents are skipped, then it seems ok.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Maheshika Goonetilleke mahesh...@wso2.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Srinath,
For MB Jira [1] (blocker), I have attached a patch. Please apply the patch
to mb 2.0.0.
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/MB-65
Thanks.
--
*Hasitha Abeykoon*
Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
*cell:* *+94 719363063*
*blog: **abeykoon.blogspot.com*
-- Forwarded message --
From: Subash Chaturanga sub...@wso2.com
Date: Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Dev] Can I mandate an LC be associated with a given RXT type?
To: Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com
Hi sir
I am not sure what pradeep did, but probably can be this
---
WSO2 Carbon 4.0.x Products_4.0.2 #156 failed.
---
Code has been updated by krishantha, anjana, asela, hasini, eranda, nandika,
suho, damitha, deep,
Thanks, I will give it a try.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Subash Chaturanga sub...@wso2.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Subash Chaturanga sub...@wso2.com
Date: Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Dev] Can I mandate an LC be associated with a given RXT
60 matches
Mail list logo
