Hi sumedha,
Did you svn up
https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/carbon/platform/trunk/components/stratos/tenant-mgtand
build?
Thanks
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Sumedha Rubasinghe sume...@wso2.comwrote:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
+1 AFAIK, here idea was to not to create this anonymous, system user and
roles in user store... Because user store can be an external AD, LDAP or
custom JDBC user store, It is not good to create users in external user
store Therefore it is planed to keep them in separate table inside
user
Congratzzz Mohan
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte
manu...@wso2.com wrote:
Congratulations Mohan !!!
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Susankha Nirmala susan...@wso2.comwrote:
congratzzz Mohan
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Geeth Munasinghe
Hi,
I am getting the following build failure.
dimuthu@dimuthu-ThinkPad-T530:~/svn/platform/trunk/products/manager$ mt
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project - [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] The project org.wso2.manager:wso2manager-parent:2.1.0-SNAPSHOT
This must be due to manager/pom.xml is referring incorrect parent version
Id. If so pls rectify the error.
parent
groupIdorg.wso2.carbon/groupId
artifactIdcarbon-products/artifactId
version4.1.0-SNAPSHOT/version
relativePath../pom.xml/relativePath
/parent
Hi Pradeep,
You are working on the session replication with hazlecast at the moment
right?.
thanks,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Thayalan thaya...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
$Subject
There is a discussion initiated by Azis regarding HTTP session replication
reimplementation (Subj: [Dev] We
Hi,
Has anyone got this? If so how did you manager overcome it?
Installation failed.
Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not be
found.
Software being installed: WSO2 Carbon - Logging Management Feature
4.2.0.SNAPSHOT (org.wso2.carbon.logging.mgt.feature.group
congrats Mohan!!!
*Shani Ranasinghe*
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 77 2273555
linked in: lk.linkedin.com/pub/shani-ranasinghe/34/111/ab
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Shameera Rathnayaka shame...@wso2.comwrote:
Congratzzz Mohan
Hi,
Upgrading jaggery in trunk to alpha3-wso2v6
thanks,
dimuthu
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Ajith,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Ajith Vitharana aji...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi AF team,
AF component has dependency to 4.1.0 , 4.1.3
Hi,
Just figured the components are old as well. So I don't think I can just
upgrade the feature level. Will Jaggery team help with the upgrade please?
thanks,
dimuthu
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi,
Upgrading jaggery in trunk to
Congrats Mohan :)
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Shani Ranasinghe sh...@wso2.com wrote:
congrats Mohan!!!
*Shani Ranasinghe*
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 77 2273555
linked in: lk.linkedin.com/pub/shani-ranasinghe/34/111/ab
On
Hi Madhuka,
Can you help dimuthu with this. This is the same as we did for Application
Server based on 4.2.0 platform
Regards,
/Nuwan
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi,
Just figured the components are old as well. So I don't think I can just
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20130805T09Z
DTEND:20130805T10Z
DTSTAMP:20130802T081908Z
ORGANIZER;CN=nuw...@wso2.com:mailto:nuw...@wso2.com
UID:ec1pb6g9gbru5c3hpfcmt6f...@google.com
Congratulations Mohan..!!!
Pushpalanka Jayawardhana
Software Engineer
WSO2 Lanka (pvt) Ltd
[image:
Facebook]http://s.wisestamp.com/links?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpushpalanka
[image:
Twitter]http://s.wisestamp.com/links?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FPushpalanka
[image:
Hi,
The problem I am trying to overcome is as below.[1] I get this when I
upgrade the trunk tojaggery feature to use 0.9.0.ALPHA3-wso2v6 and fix the
appfactory product poms according to it.
Futhermore having this in trunk is very confusing [2]. Shall we delete that.
thanks,
dimuthu
[1]
Yeah it has to be tested, but I am concerned that this is a bit too close
to the release date has to be implemented from scratch. If we cannot make
it, let's release it for 4.2.1
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Thayalan thaya...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
$Subject
There is a discussion
Hi,
We are having problem during appfactory, application creations. At the
moment, appfactory app creation is handled by super tenant (application
creation is handled by BPEL service and it is deployed as super tenant),
therefore when number of tenants increase, there will be over-loaded in
BPEL
You have to cluster the BPEL itself, and run several instances of it.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Nihanth Joseph niha...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
We are having problem during appfactory, application creations. At the
moment, appfactory app creation is handled by super tenant (application
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Nuwan Bandara nu...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Madhuka,
Can you help dimuthu with this. This is the same as we did for Application
Server based on 4.2.0 platform
ok, I will follow it.
Regards,
/Nuwan
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne
Hi all,
I think the question does not convey the real problem, which is whether to
run BPEL in or super tenant only - which is the current case. I believe the
correct thing is
1 - Run the tenant creation BPEL in super tenant
2 - Run rest of the BPEL in tenant space
Feature-wise i think it is
FYI, I'm getting this when building on a clean repo.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wso2throttle-parent: Could not
resolve dependencies for project
org.wso2.throttle:wso2throttle-parent:pom:3.3.0-wso2v1: Could not find
artifact org.apache.axis2:axis2-kernel:jar:1.6.1-wso2v8 in
Fixed in r179714.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
FYI, I'm getting this when building on a clean repo.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wso2throttle-parent: Could not
resolve dependencies for project
Hi,
This issue occurs very frequently now. When this exception occurred
then the mgt console operations become annoyingly slow. and have to restart
ELB.
regards,
Nirodha
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Nirodha Pramod niro...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
Observed that this usually happens when
Hi ESB team,
Can you please own this passthru transport issue too?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Nirodha Pramod niro...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
This issue occurs very frequently now. When this exception occurred
then the mgt console operations become annoyingly slow. and have to restart
Congratulations Mohan!!
On 2 August 2013 00:24, Sriskandarajah Suhothayan s...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Its my pleasure to welcome Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam (Mohan) as a
WSO2 Committer. He has contributed alot to CEP, already written four
components and driving CEP 3.0.0 release.
Hi,
Registry based deployment synchronization fails. Observed the following
exception when artifacts are being synchronized at worker nodes.
Hi,
we have to set the proper CC during sync up. This works fine with svn
depsync since the execution path does not include cache retrieval.
With registry based depsync in place, the error surfaces. (thread not
having tenant info).
if all the tenant artifacts are maintained in super-tenant
Hi,
I deployed a data source in DSS product (which is in trunk) as a tenant
admin and that was deployed successfully. But when I browse that resource
in the registry it gives the following exception.
[2013-08-02 13:40:17,011] ERROR
Carbon kernel now has multiple profile support. The default profile is
called 'default'.
Earlier it used to be 'WSO2Carbon'
changing the above in p2-profile gen, should fix your isuue. I think we did
the change for trunk/products
may be i have missed one..
thanks,
--Pradeep
On Fri, Aug 2,
Related JIRA - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-1706
Regards,
Evanthika
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Chanika Geeganage chan...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
I deployed a data source in DSS product (which is in trunk) as a tenant
admin and that was deployed successfully. But when I browse that
Hi Asela,
I think we should discuss these type of changes. Can you please let us know
(list down) all these kind of changes?
Also do we need to change other users as well? I am having permission issue
with wso2.system.user. Wonder here I have to append *system/
*
*-*Lasith*
*
On Fri, Aug 2,
Hi all,
Got this on a clean build.
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 1:53:15.647s
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Aug 02 11:25:39 UTC 2013
Congrats Mohan ...:-)
*
Maninda Edirisooriya*
Software Engineer
*WSO2, Inc.
*lean.enterprise.middleware.
*Blog* : http://maninda.blogspot.com/
*Phone* : +94 777603226
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Balakrishnan Gokulakrishnan
go...@wso2.comwrote:
Congratulations Mohan!!
On 2 August 2013
Hi all,
We are writing the Siddhi QL spec for new Siddhi 2.0.0 which will ship with
CEP-3.0.0 and there will be a lot of changes with Siddhi 2.0.0 (Changes in
syntax structure, Partitioning, Event Tables, Output Rate Limiting,
External Time Windows etc.). We feel that the current doc structure
Missed the link... :-)
[1] http://docs.wso2.org/wiki/display/CEP210/Siddhi+Language+Specification
On 2 August 2013 17:58, Lasantha Fernando lasan...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
We are writing the Siddhi QL spec for new Siddhi 2.0.0 which will ship
with CEP-3.0.0 and there will be a lot of
Hi Anjana,
Fixed with r179731.
Thanks
Dulanja
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Anjana Fernando anj...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
$subject, getting the following, please check.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.0.2:compile
(default-compile) on
It good to have a tutorial like structure, but covering all the query
specification in that will make it not user-friendly.
I think having a proper specification, and brief tutorial guide will be the
best case.
At the same time using samples we can demonstrate different real life
use-cases
WDUT?
Congratulations Mohan!!!
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Sriskandarajah Suhothayan s...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Folks,
Its my pleasure to welcome Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam (Mohan) as a
WSO2 Committer. He has contributed alot to CEP, already written four
components and driving CEP 3.0.0
Hi Senaka,
I was able to proceed with the build once, after getting the same error,
after building from
'platform/components/mediation/mediation-library/connectors/org.wso2.carbon.mediation.library.connectors.core/'
and resuming the build from top. Though this is only a temporary solution.
There
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
But, if there are two competing components having the same menu name, and
they want both UIs on the product, the solution is not hiding, rather to
have names that not conflict.
Also, if you do not want a UI, then right
It is good to see the milestones coming.
We have covered good ground so far it seems. Shall we have a review session
based on this milestone next week? Do we have enough UIs in there to help
evaluate?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Nuwan Bandara nu...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Samisa,
On Fri,
Test set: org.wso2.carbon.module.mgt.service.TestModuleAdminService
---
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 4, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 8.951 sec
FAILURE!
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Sriskandarajah Suhothayan s...@wso2.comwrote:
It good to have a tutorial like structure, but covering all the query
specification in that will make it not user-friendly.
+1. Yes, That's right... It is better to add some graphical content without
only going
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam
mo...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Sriskandarajah Suhothayan
s...@wso2.comwrote:
It good to have a tutorial like structure, but covering all the query
specification in that will make it not
+1 for the brief tutorial + full specification approach. That will give the
best of both...
@Mohan, can you elaborate on how we should provide graphical content? Do
you mean like a query tree/flow diagram like thing to explain the query?
Yes, I guess we can introduce something like that to some
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Lasantha Fernando lasan...@wso2.com wrote:
+1 for the brief tutorial + full specification approach. That will give
the best of both...
@Mohan, can you elaborate on how we should provide graphical content? Do
you mean like a query tree/flow diagram like thing
Fixed in r179751.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Lasantha Fernando lasan...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Senaka,
I was able to proceed with the build once, after getting the same error,
after building from
Yes it is good to have such a structure. and also please provide faq kind a
doc to recap!!
Best regards,
Vanji
On Aug 2, 2013 10:48 PM, Lasantha Fernando lasan...@wso2.com wrote:
+1 for the brief tutorial + full specification approach. That will give
the best of both...
@Mohan, can you
Hi,
You can pick a suitable real life use-case such as Bank transaction system,
etc and use that throughout this doc/tutorial. And along with the
explanation of SiddhiQL you can map the real business requirement, and also
explain how the siddhi query can be used in that space. IMHO it will be
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Lasantha Fernando lasan...@wso2.comwrote:
+1 for the brief tutorial + full specification approach. That will give
the best of both...
@Mohan, can you elaborate on how we should provide graphical content? Do
you mean like a query tree/flow diagram like thing
Hi All,
I'm getting the following error when trying to build AM Pack. Even, trying
to build set feature manually wont help.
Installing
org.wso2.carbon.identity.authenticator.saml2.sso.ui.feature.group
4.2.0.SNAPSHOT.
Installing org.wso2.carbon.as.runtimes.cxf.feature.group 4.2.0.SNAPSHOT.
Hi Ruwan,
Did not happen in a clean repo build that just succeeded off r179674.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Ruwan Yatawara ruw...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm getting the following error when trying to build AM Pack. Even, trying
to build set feature manually wont
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Ruwan,
Did not happen in a clean repo build that just succeeded off r179674.
Not sure you build the AM product , because it doesn't include to
product/pom.xml :)
I'll look in to this.
Thanks,
KasunG
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Ajith Vitharana aji...@wso2.com wrote:
Test set: org.wso2.carbon.module.mgt.service.TestModuleAdminService
---
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0,
I have temporarily commented it out. Need to move this in to AS integration
tests.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe kas...@wso2.com wrote:
I'll look in to this.
Thanks,
KasunG
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Ajith Vitharana aji...@wso2.com wrote:
Test set:
Please fix .
Caused by: org.wso2.carbon.user.mgt.common.UserAdminException: *Read only
user store or Role creation is disabled*
at o*rg.wso2.carbon.user.mgt.UserRealmProxy.addRole(UserRealmProxy.java:789)
*
... 46 more
TID: [0] [Greg] [2013-08-02 23:46:28,722] ERROR
This can be a regression of the fix r179645.
Thanks
Ajith.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Ajith Vitharana aji...@wso2.com wrote:
Please fix .
Caused by: org.wso2.carbon.user.mgt.common.UserAdminException: *Read only
user store or Role creation is disabled*
at o*
Hi Samisa,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
It is good to see the milestones coming.
We have covered good ground so far it seems. Shall we have a review
session based on this milestone next week? Do we have enough UIs in there
to help evaluate?
OK, sounds good, lets wait for M3 then.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Nuwan Bandara nu...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Samisa,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.comwrote:
It is good to see the milestones coming.
We have covered good ground so far it seems. Shall we
Hi Ajith,
The products are built separately on the builder machine.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Ajith Vitharana aji...@wso2.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Ruwan,
Did not happen in a clean repo build that just
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Ajith,
The products are built separately on the builder machine.
No. It shouldn't be. They have added cxf runtime feature but it required org
.wso2.carbon.webapp.mgt.feature.group and org.wso2.carbon.jaxws.webapp.mgt.
61 matches
Mail list logo
