Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hi Kasun, So shall I update the draft ? What do you think. I think the best approach is to make this a separate application. Otherwise it will anyways have an effect on the performance of ESB. Because this tool includes some serious IO operations On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Kasun Indrasiri

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

It's fine. But just want to make sure this is added to the project plan as we move forward. On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kasun , > It's now I saw this mail. Can I do the change now ? I guess it's too late > now. Anyway on your

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hi Kasun , It's now I saw this mail. Can I do the change now ? I guess it's too late now. Anyway on your second point I have said that making flight recorder a separate application will stop applying any performance degradation on ESB. Anyway it would have been better if I have added the

Re: [Dev] Proposal 28: [CDMF] [IOT] IOT SDK for creating Device Agents

Hi Harshani, Could you please try to contact the GSOC through their mailing list regarding this. Since we cannot accept a proposal directly. Further, In the Box 2 Your proposal should say in blue letters "Final Proposal submitted" to make sure that proposal has been submitted properly. Thanks

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Dinanjana, can you please include several use cases related to possible production issues in an ESB (such as out of memory, CPU spinning, deadlock etc.). Also, running the ESB flight recorder should have minimal impact on the ESB performance. Hence your proposal should include an ESB performance

Re: [Dev] Proposal 8: [ESB/GW] HTTP Load balancer on top of WSO2 Gateway - Reg

Venkat added few comments. The proposal looks good! On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Venkat Raman wrote: > Hi Kasun, > > I have enabled it now. Kindly add your comments. I'll incorporate them > and plan accordingly. > > Thanks, > Venkat. > On Mar 25, 2016 11:03 PM,

Re: [Dev] Regarding the Location and Time-based Device Policy Enforcement Project for Gsoc2016

Dear Mentors Thank you for the clarifying things ,and giving me support until the last moment. I submitted my final proposal and hope to complete this project successfully within the time period. Thank you > Sameera > ___ Dev mailing list

Re: [Dev] Device Enrollment Failed - WSO2 EMM 2.0

Hi suresh, Seem like the issue is with the SMTP server certificate. Have you added your SMTP server's certificate to the keystore? Regards, On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Kamidu Punchihewa wrote: > Hi Suresh, > > Can you kindly provide the new mailto configuration. > >

Re: [Dev] Fwd: [GSoC 16'] Proposal 20: [IS] SCIM 2.0 Support to WSO2 Identity Server

Hi all, I added the final proposal to the gsoc site, thank you all for the support and guidance. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Manujith Pallewatte wrote: > Hi Chamila, > > I added the draft to GSoC site and selected the share draft option as well > But didn't upload

Re: [Dev] Regarding the Location and Time-based Device Policy Enforcement Project for Gsoc2016

Hi Sameera, We are going to have a way to retrieve device details periodically in WSO2EMM. Some of it's implementation is available in the master branch of carbon-device-mgt [1], but not completed yet (Will be available most probably by the end of this month or first week of April) . One of the

Re: [Dev] Regarding the Location and Time-based Device Policy Enforcement Project for Gsoc2016

Hi Sameera, I had a look at the proposal and it looks OK. I made some comments to some places where you had writing mistakes. It's better if you can format it in a better manner. Also it's better if you can tell a bit about how you trigger the location boundaries (ex: implementing GEO fencing

[Dev] GSoC Proposal Submitted

Dear Mentors, I would like to thank you all for providing valuable feedback and support during project proposal phase. I have submitted the proposal and am looking forward to work on the project. Thanks again! Abhishek ___ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2016]Proposal 03:[ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder

Hi, I have submitted my project proposal on GSoC page and here is the link of the draft proposal[1]. [1]Proposal-Final could you please comment if there are anything more to correct? Thank you

Re: [Dev] [App Manager] Deadlock during concurrent user login in App Store

Does default AppM configuration can create such # of DB connection at a given time? Regards, Chandana On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Thilini Shanika wrote: > We tested the same scenario pointing to a mysql db and did not encounter > deadlocks anymore. As you mentioned,

Re: [Dev] Fwd: GSOC2016: Proposal 6: [ML]

Hi Mahesh, Can you add the time line of the project as I've mentioned. It's one of the crucial parts of the proposal that allows us to evaluate feasibility of the project in accordance with the given time period by Google. Best regards. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Mahesh Dananjaya

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hi Isuru , Thanks for the input :) On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Isuru , > Thanks for the input :) > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Isuru Udana wrote: > >> Hi Dinanjana, >> >> Proposal looks really good to

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hi Dinanjana, Proposal looks really good to me. Added several comments as well. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > I submitted my proposal to gsoc site and shared the draft with WSO2 > earlier this week. Any thoughts on my

Re: [Dev] Fwd: GSOC2016: Proposal 6: [ML]

Also, please include an introduction to yourself (University, department), past experience in machine learning, language proficiency, etc at the beginning of the proposal. Best regards. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Maheshakya Wijewardena wrote: > Hi Mahesh, > > Thank

Re: [Dev] Fwd: GSOC2016: Proposal 6: [ML]

Hi Mahesh, Thank you for sending the draft. Please submit it as soon as possible. Few high level comments: In the proposal, you must specifically mention that this will be implemented as a Siddhi extension that can operate directly on incoming streams. Also, you need to have a time line for

Re: [Dev] Tenant-aware logging for ESB

Hi Kasun, +1 for including the Tenant Specific filtering enabled and we have already included this feature for logging the car file name for the artifacts deployed through car file. Thanks, *Nadeeshaan Gunasinghe* Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com +94770596754 | nadeesh...@wso2.com |

Re: [Dev] [App Manager] Deadlock during concurrent user login in App Store

We tested the same scenario pointing to a mysql db and did not encounter deadlocks anymore. As you mentioned, this issue specifically occurs with H2 db. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Manuranga Perera wrote: > [looping] > I think this coming form Greg layer and it is due to

Re: [Dev] [IOT] How does IOTS handle a device to stop publishing messages when the device is deleted from the server

Hi Jason, We are planing to implement work flow to proceed required actions upon device delete. But implementations didn't started yet since we are waiting to have token based authentication for MQTT. Once it is completed, we can revoke issued token to device and then can stop data publishing

Re: [Dev] Proposal 8: [ESB/GW] HTTP Load balancer on top of WSO2 Gateway - Reg

Venkat please grant the rights to add comment to the proposal. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Venkat Raman wrote: > Hi Senduran, > > Good Evening. I'm aspiring to participate in GSoC 2016 with HTTP LB on > top of gw as my project. I see u as a major contributor for

Re: [Dev] Proposal 8: [ESB/GW] HTTP Load balancer on top of WSO2 Gateway - Reg

I think for the LB runtime also we should use the same engine that we are building for the integration server. I think IsuruU is still finalizing the code and the repo structure. Once it is completed, Venkat can start working on the same engine. So, in the mean time shall we start focusing on a

Re: [Dev] Proposal 4: [ML] Ensemble Methods Support for WSO2 Machine Learner

Hi, I have submitted draft proposal on GSOC page and here is the link of the draft proposal. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4bKe2Zv84IHTXlGekxTTTZjUnM/view?usp=sharing Please give me a review before the final proposal submission deadline if possible. Thanks. On 21 March 2016 at 14:19, Supun

Re: [Dev] GSoC '16 - Proposal 16: Contact Development Team feature in DevStudio

Hi again, I've uploaded my draft proposal and the link is https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vRlm5vFJXcCJ7bkMPY6JRzdk90jelnsPNGtrCs8TkSE/edit?usp=sharing . Please provide some feedback on what I have missed, what more I can include and such. I am extremely sorry that this comes so late. Best

[Dev] [IOT] How does IOTS handle a device to stop publishing messages when the device is deleted from the server

Hi All, In a scenario where an enrolled device to IOTS is been deleted by the Admin and assume that the device published data via MQTT. At present IOTS will set the deleted device status to removed and will disable viewing stats etc. for that device. However, the device will still keep publishing

Re: [Dev] [App Manager] Deadlock during concurrent user login in App Store

[looping] I think this coming form Greg layer and it is due to using H2. Chandana please comment on this. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Thilini Shanika wrote: > Adding Dev. > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Thilini Shanika > wrote: > >> >> Hi ES

Re: [Dev] [App Manager] Deadlock during concurrent user login in App Store

Adding Dev. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Thilini Shanika wrote: > > Hi ES team, > > During App Manager load testing on App Store user login we encountered > below exception (We are getting the error with 100 concurrent users). This > occurs during the initial user login

Re: [Dev] How to create database tables with -Dsetup in Carbon 5?

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Isuru Perera wrote: > Hi, > > In Carbon 4.x.x, we extend [1] > org.wso2.carbon.utils.dbcreator.DatabaseCreator [2]. How can we do the same > in Carbon 5? > Hi Isuru, There is no such feature planned or available ATM for hamming platform

[Dev] How to create database tables with -Dsetup in Carbon 5?

Hi, In Carbon 4.x.x, we extend [1] org.wso2.carbon.utils.dbcreator.DatabaseCreator [2]. How can we do the same in Carbon 5? Thanks! [1] https://github.com/search?l==DatabaseCreator++user%3Awso2=advsearch=Code=%E2%9C%93 [2]

Re: [Dev] Setting up a local Kubernetes v1.2.0 cluster in around 2 minutes

Hi, This is great. It just took under 3 minutes to setup a Kubernetes cluster with 1 node from the 2nd time onwards. Regards, Vishanth On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Hi Devs, > > I just updated the Kubernetes Vagrant Setup [1] to do $subject. This

[Dev] Tenant-aware logging for ESB

Hi, AFAIR, Nadeeshan has implemented this features (for ESB 5). We want to make sure that what we have at the moment is sufficient to filter out the tenant specific logs (and even cApp specific logs). @Nadeeshan/Manjula wdyt? -- Kasun Indrasiri Software Architect WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com

Re: [Dev] Proposal 8: [ESB/GW] HTTP Load balancer on top of WSO2 Gateway - Reg

Hi Venkat, As a first step, you can extend the carbon message process with your simpleLB. Similar to your MockEngine. I'll share you a sample soon to send a request to the server. Regards Senduran On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Venkat Raman wrote: > Hi Senduran, > >

[Dev] [Test Automation] Webdriver not compatible with latest firefox

Hi automation team, Currently EMM and IoTServer have some UI tests which is running on firefox using Webdriver. However with latest firefox versions, Webdriver extension is disabled by the browser, because extension is not signed. So currently we are using older version of firefox when needs to