Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][ESB]Native inbound and connector for IBM MQ 8.0

+1 I'll be available after 13.00 On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Hasitha Jayasundara < > hasithajayasunda...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Friday afternoon fine me with.Any suggestions? >> >> On Mon, Jun

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][ESB]Native inbound and connector for IBM MQ 8.0

+1 On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Hasitha Jayasundara < hasithajayasunda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Friday afternoon fine me with.Any suggestions? > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Malaka Silva wrote: > >> Wednesday morning or Friday afternoon fine with me. >> >> On

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][ESB]Native inbound and connector for IBM MQ 8.0

Hi all, Friday afternoon fine me with.Any suggestions? On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Malaka Silva wrote: > Wednesday morning or Friday afternoon fine with me. > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > >> Hi Hasitha, >> >> Great progress

Re: [Dev] [DEV] MSF4J level support to get resource template of a http request

This happens because, in our rest api generated code, we do not have @Path annotation is defined for root collection, For example* /apis* is defined as, @GET > > @Consumes({ "application/json" }) > @Produces({ "application/json" }) > @io.swagger.annotations.ApiOperation(value = "Retrieve/Search

Re: [Dev] [DEV] Can we bind custom interceptors in msf4j2.3.0-m2

Hi Ishara, IMHO this is a valid requirement. But as Vidura mentioned ATM we don;t support dynamic binding from MSF4J. So we need to implement this from MSF4J level. Then we can provide the ability to add/remove interceptors at the runtime. @Azeez, Kishanthan WDYT? Thanks Thusitha On Mon, Jun

Re: [Dev] [DEV] MSF4J level support to get resource template of a http request

Hi Ishara, Since this is direct Java reflection call, ideally it shouldn't return null if there is a @Path annotation. That seems strange. Thanks Thusitha On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Ishara Cooray wrote: > You can access the actual method that will get invoke at the

[Dev] [EI 6.1.1] DM vs PF, which is fast?

Do we have a comparison? -- Rajkumar Rajaratnam Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 LinkedIn: https://lk.linkedin.com/in/rajuu Mobile: +1 408 791 7640 Blogs: http://wso2tech.blogspot.com/ | https://medium.com/@wso2tech

[Dev] Unable to post EI EventStream data to Data Analytics

Hello Dev team, I have an issue with posting Event Stream data from latest EI to Data Analytics dashboard. i.e The Event Stream that I create in EI is not listed in Data Analytics - Event Streams listing. I used to have this same issue with ESB and DAS combination too. I followed all the

Re: [Dev] API 2.1.0 + Identity Server 5.3.0

That works!!! Is it possible for you to explain what does 'Use user store domain in local subject identifier' option do? Thanks, Javier From: Omindu Rathnaweera [mailto:omi...@wso2.com] Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 3:21 AM To: Vazquez-Hidalgo, Javier Cc: Isura Karunaratne; dev@wso2.org

Re: [Dev] [DEV] MSF4J level support to get resource template of a http request

You can access the actual method that will get invoke at the Interceptor level e.g. request.getProperty("method");[1] So then you can get the @Path value of the method and compare that with the request.getUri(). Hi Thusitha, This worked for me. However, for resource paths such as "*/apis*" @Path

Re: [Dev] [DEV] Can we bind custom interceptors in msf4j2.3.0-m2

+ architecture I f you are asking about the dynamic interceptors similar to the dynamic binding of filters in JAX-RS spec [1], MSF4J currently do not support dynamic binding of interceptors. [1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

Hi, Kindly find the weekly update below. Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp component proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked in to implementing scimcore component as well. In implementing the scimcore component, as we discussed in the previous

[Dev] Regarding SCIM Extension

Hi All, I am working with WSO2 IS (5.3.0) for one of my projects. I can successfully register a user using SCIM. But there are some attributes that I need which are not provided by SCIM by default. After a bit of search I found SCIM extension feature provided .So I configured IS according to

[Dev] SCIM Extension

Hi Devs, I working with wso2 IS. I need register user. but user have some attribute that are not provided IS . I found SCIM extension feacher provided by wso2 IS. so I configure IS following link is Scim Extention feacher work in wso2 Is 5.3.0 -- Best Regards, *Supun Madushanka*

Re: [Dev] [IS] Providing UI based configuration support for JWT audiences

I think its something related to OAuth only. So saving in SP properties table isn't the most correct solution. AFAIR for the SAML case we have saved properties separately with the registry resource. But rather than saving this in registry +1 to save in DB. And +1 for Option 2. But beware about the

[Dev] [IS] Providing UI based configuration support for JWT audiences

Hi, Currently new audience values to JWT id_tokens should be added via identity.xml file and server needs to be restarted. With this approach we cannot control the id_token audience at SP level since it gets applied globally through identity.xml based configuration. In this case, we are not able