Hi Juan,
Just to keep you informed that any issues we get to know about in future,
would be fixed through our update process (https://wso2.com/updates/wum)
Thank you
Charini
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Charini Nanayakkara <chari...@wso2.com>
wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> Than
_SECONDS has 34
> of length, and the limit is 30.
>
> Thank you for correct the problem of aggregation with Oracle DB, because
> we are doing some POCs and our clients has mainly Oracle.
>
> Juan Pablo Vadell | *VATROX*
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:52 AM, Charin
28 bytes from 12.2.
>
> I created an issue at github before you, but in the wrong place.
> https://github.com/wso2/siddhi/issues/717
>
> Thank you,
>
> Juan Pablo Vadell | *VATROX*
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Charini Nanayakkara <chari...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
Hi Juan,
Thank you for reporting this issue.
SP aggregation has only been tested with MySql so far. We have updated that
information in SP documentation [1]
As explained by you, the reported issue arises in Oracle, due to not
specifying attributes starting with underscore (such as _TIMESTAMP)
;go...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Charini,
>
> Are you sure that this worked with the RDBMS store before? It has not
> supported function namespaces from the start.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On 2 November 2017 at 11:40, Charini Nanayakkara <chari...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
Hi Suho,
Incremental processing is not working with RDBMS due to a new change
introduced at RDBMS extension level which rejects function namespaces. I
will discuss this with Gokul as well and find a solution.
Thank you
Charini
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Sriskandarajah Suhothayan
Hi Junior,
I tried this scenario with a topic subscription but couldn't reproduce the
issue. The exact same jndi properties were used whereas the axis
configurations were same except for the fact that I tried with a topic. Not
sure whether it's specific to queues. Will test that scenario and
Hi Hasara,
You can use any IDE such as Intellij, Eclipse, etc. No such plugins are
needed to build the source code. Just checkout the code and play around
with the test cases to get a basic idea.
Best Regards
Charini
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Hasara Maithree <
Hi,
Sorry for the delayed response.
As per the existing implementation, we cannot achieve your requirement with
sort window due to two reasons.
1) We cannot alter the value of an event which has already been consumed by
a stream. Therefore, we can't change the value of event (id: 3, score: 30)
Hi,
Just to clarify your requirement.
Do you want to get the topK (highest frequency values) [1] and then sort
the result [2] in ascending or descending order?
[1]
https://docs.wso2.com/display/SIDDHIEXTENSIONS/Extrema+Extension#ExtremaExtension-topK
[2]
m the kernel in C5. We have to see how to expose
> these kind of information from the relevant transport implementation level.
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Charini Nanayakkara <chari...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are in the process of movi
Hi,
We are in the process of moving carbon analytics common to C5. When
migrating, it was noted that C5 disallows us to obtain the hostname (or the
server url) unlike in C4. Since the hostname is required in many instances,
is it going to be supported in a latter version of C5? Or is there an
Congratz Malintha!!! :)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Menaka Jayawardena wrote:
> Congratz Malintha.!
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Irunika Weeraratne
> wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Malintha!!!
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Irunika
>>
>> *Irunika Weeraratne*
Congrats Kasun!!! :)
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Sameera Gunarathne
wrote:
> Congrats Kasun !!!
> On Oct 21, 2016 1:18 PM, "Kasun Thennakoon" wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Prakhash Sivakumar
Congrats Ashen! :)
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Mushthaq Rumy wrote:
> Congrats Ashen!
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Mushthaq
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Sameera Ramasinghe
> wrote:
>
>> Congratz Ashen!!
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Grainier
Hi Aneela,
You can use RDBMS tables for this requirement. Please refer to [1]. You may
use WSO2_CARBON_DB as the datasource. Follow the steps in [2] to access
your tables
[1]
https://docs.wso2.com/display/CEP410/SiddhiQL+Guide+3.0#SiddhiQLGuide3.0-RDBMSEventTable
[2]
Hi Aneela,
If you need to count all the records (without grouping by employee_id) you
will have to do something similar to the following. (This is just one way
of addressing your requirement)
(define an in-memory table to store count)
define table CountTable (count long);
from
Hi,
In a recent implementation where a stream needed to be simulated with 10
million events using a Java client, using publish method (blocking
publisher) was a better option than using tryPublish (non-blocking
publisher). The 10 million events were successfully sent to the stream with
publish
Hi Aneela,
The siddhi query you have specified processes each and every incoming
event. Since processing is done in real time, when the first event for
ts= 2016-05-08
09:00 arrives it gives count = 1 (due to no events with ts = 2016-05-08
09:00 having arrived earlier). When second event with ts =
mit
>> check can be disabled by adding the option -XX:-UseGCOverheadLimit to
>> the command line.
>>
>> More information can be found here [1]
>>
>>
>> [1] :
>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/gc-tuning-6-140523.html#par_gc.oom
>>
Hi,
I get $subject when attempting to execute Max aggregate function when a 3
min duration is considered on an external time stamp. The overhead limit is
likely to have exceeded due to 9 000 000 events arriving within this 3 min
duration. Any suggestions on resolving this issue are appreciated.
Hi,
Apart from what Yashothara pointed out, change how you have used dateFormat
extension in the query. time:dateFormat (ts,'-MM-dd HH:mm') is the
proper way of using the function
Thanks
Charini
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Yashothara Shanmugarajah <
yashoth...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Liangfei.Su,
This is the expected behavior of external time window. Since it's a moving
time window, you get an output for each incoming event. Due to the presence
of the group by keyword, it would give an aggregate output by considering
the events with the same uuid and similarityId, which
Hi,
Can we not use WSO2 ESB as a mediator in achieving this task. To my
knowledge we can do some processing with ESB prior to sending received
information as mail.
http://sparkletechthoughts.blogspot.com/2012/08/how-to-send-mails-using-wso2-esb.html
i Charini,
> In addition, if you could get the same resultset using sql joins (instead
> of unions) you can increase the performance when querying.
> When using union's, it takes a considerable effort when combining the
> distinct results.
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Charini Nan
>
> SparkSQL parser only takes one single select element in the insert
> queries, and at the end of a select query it expects a limit (if
> available). therefore, you need to wrap the subsequent select statements
> into one select element.
>
> Hope this resolves your issue
>
> Best
Hi,
The following query was attempted to be executed when performing batch
analytics with WSO2 DAS using Spark SQL. Tables 'First', 'Middle' and
'Third' are required to be combined and written to table 'All_three'.
INSERT OVERWRITE TABLE All_three SELECT SYMBOL, VOLUME FROM First
UNION SELECT
27 matches
Mail list logo