I thought the MB already had support for dynamic destinations?. In fact we
had it in very early versions IIRC.
Danushka
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Shammi,
When we try to integrate ESB with MB 2.0.x, if we want to send messages to
a queue
Guys,
It is worth taking a look at it as it includes supports for AMQP 1.0 and
also for broker HA.
Danushka
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robbie Gemmell rob...@apache.org
Date: Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:52 AM
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Qpid 0.18 released
To: annou...@apache.org,
Hi,
I see the current source tree is quite different from what I have at the
moment. I slightly remember that there was some discussion on restructuring
the source tree but can not track the mail thread.
Anyway, how to go about building a product?. Can I just checkout and do a
build at the top?
Since most of your product names are self-explanatory, a fancy name might
look little awkward. But most naturally the question is host what?.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi all,
Meanwhile Damitha et al are working on LXC related work, I was
Hi,
Just wanted to find out the link for app server source code.
I do not see a link for source code on product home page (i.e.
http://wso2.com/products/application-server/)
I get a 404 for the link (
https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/trunk/carbon/products/appserver) on
I think the general practice it to send a success mail for the first
successful build after a build break.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Would it be a good idea to NOT send the mail if it was successful?
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Bamboo
I thought Bamboo had a dashboard (and could send notifications out?). Maybe
you can have it on a widescreen at the lounge so that everybody sees how
the builder is doing? ;-)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Shammi
Correct!. In fact we opted for Qpid taking lot of things into consideration
leaving ActiveMQ behind.
Danushka
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
Suho
What is the use case for this? Users can already use ActiveMQ with the ESB
and other products via the JMS
You can get rid of most of these jars even though they are just there on
the Qpid trunk. We used to have the minimum set of jars before. Ideally we
should have maven dependency plugin downloading jars from Maven repo into
the lib dir. Please take a look at [1].
[1] -
I think it should go in to the Configure pane. Also I think you need to
list down other connection-url-related details like vhosts, etc too.
Danushka
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Nirmal,
Please see my comments inline.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012
Are you guys planning to graduate possible components after the
stabilization effort?.
Danushka
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
-1. That breaks the one-checkout one-build concept. The building by
parts is fine, but building from the root pom level is also
Also I think you need to have some startup/teardown impl in
CarbonTestRunner so that common init/cleanup work can be done in there. For
an example inserting a database entry at the beginning and deleting at the
end.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue,
Pradeep,
It is really worthwhile having a CIS (Jenkins) set up so that you can have
integration tests, coverage checks, find bugs, doc generation, etc
integrated. If you can host it publicly, then all Carbon committers can
have access to it's dashboard and visualize various patterns. It will also
And you might find [1] quite useful too ;-).
[1] - http://www.papercut.com/blog/chris/2011/08/19/who-broke-the-build/
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Pradeep Fernando prad...@wso2.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com wrote
Hi,
Apparently Robbie has done certain changes to the broker which claim to
have fixed some serious OOM issues. Specially [1] looks appealing. Can
someone working on Qpid bits please check?.
[1] -
, Paul Fremantle p...@wso2.com wrote:
Danushka
Thanks! We'll take a look. We have also been trying out a Cassandra store
if you are interested.
Paul
On 31 October 2011 06:01, Danushka Menikkumbura
danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Apparently Robbie has done certain changes
to deprecate
and remove old spec versions. What do you think?
Paul
On 31 October 2011 11:37, Danushka Menikkumbura
danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
Yes that I've heard.
My concern was OOM issues. The ones we identified and submitted patches
for were mainly
FYA.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Praveen M lefthandma...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:31 AM
Subject: Java Broker - creating and closing too many connections causes
memory leak?
To: us...@qpid.apache.org
Hi,
I ran the following test a few times and I ran into a OOM
-- Forwarded message --
From: Justin Ross jr...@apache.org
Date: Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:21 PM
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Qpid 0.12 released
To: annou...@apache.org, d...@qpid.apache.org, us...@qpid.apache.org
The Apache Qpid community is pleased to announce the immediate
availability
FYA [1].
Might have an impact on the CSG.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3429
Thanks,
Danushka
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
Hi,
Is $subject possible?
Thanks,
Danushka
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
.
thanks,
Amila.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.com
wrote:
I have forked the latest Qpid trunk (r1138752) into Carbon dependencies
with the version 0.11-wso2v2. I have also patched it and changed orbit and
features/qpid modules on the trunk and 3.2.1 branch
Please find the doc at [1].
[1] -
https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/document/d/1WfaGLInDM-CpFnYeBxwUQyw0jab9BarkG_teuKSVYMc/edit?hl=en_US
Danushka
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Yes. I was planning to add that as a separate task under the JIRA
components/logging/org.wso2.carbon.logging.view.ui for an instance.
Danushka
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
Just finished building the orbit w/o issue.
Danushka
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
[INFO] Installing
/home/rajika/projects/carbon/3.2.0/orbit/httpcore/4.1.0-wso2v1/target/httpcore-4.1.0-wso2v1.jar
to
We have hit an OOM again. Need to look at the heap dump.
Danushka
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Manjula, Danushka, Rajika, Ruchira,
Can we resolve your L1s today?
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Prabath Siriwardena prab...@wso2.comwrote:
$subject
You need to have your connection factories, queues and topic defined in your
jndi properties file.
Danushka
axis2-jms-transport-listener-config-for-qpid
Description: Binary data
jndi.properties
Description: Binary data
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
On it for the MB.
Danushka
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Supun Kamburugamuva su...@wso2.com wrote:
We have fixed the versions in the 3.2.0 branch. We could build the ESB
successfully. Still in the process of building other products.
Products teams please try to build your products and fix
We need to rerun the Qpid long-runing test before resolving the Qpid issue.
Danushka
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
We've just got 13 L1 issues left. Good effort team.
Can we have the remaining issues resolved today?
--
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of
I was able to build dependencies with a clean repo. Now building the rest.
Danushka
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
When I try to build the branch from the top, I get the following error
[INFO]
NOTE: Maven is executing in offline mode. Any artifacts not
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
It is 0.11-wso2v1.
Danushka
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Milinda Pathirage mili...@wso2.comwrote:
Current version of QPid dependency is 0.11. I think we should differentiate
our code base version from normal Apache versions.
Thanks
Milinda
--
Milinda Pathirage
Technical Lead and
Also the class-loading issues in JMS transport and this particular issue
that Charith is having are results of that.
Danushka
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Of course we can go for a very clean OSGi based solution if we drop
supports for Carbon webapp
Hi Ajith,
Any update on this?
Danushka
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Fixed on the trunk.
Danushka
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Ajith Vitharana aji...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm testing latest wso2greg-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT
I have 5 L1's assigned to myself.
[1] - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-10154
[2] - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-9916
[3] - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-9897
[4] - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-9515
[5] - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-9996
[6] -
Excellent!
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Ajith Vitharana aji...@wso2.com wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Ajith,
Any update on this?
Hi Danushka,
I have verified with latest build (20-May-2011) and registry eventing
Should not the feature manager take care of installing dependencies?
Danushka
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Kasun Indrasiri ka...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi devs,
We came across couple of issues while we were installing ESB features on a
raw carbon server. Most of the esb features currently
Fixed on the trunk.
Danushka
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Ajith Vitharana aji...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm testing latest wso2greg-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT on WAS 7.0.0.11. (java version
1.6.0_24 , WindowsXp).
I did not not encountered any broken pages, but when i trying to subscribe
for a
This gets added as a result of installing event.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Why do we need this in AS?
On May 19, 2011 9:37 PM, Charitha Kankanamge chari...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed a new module. sqsAuthentication in the module list in
The thing is you can also specify an SQS queue as an event sink.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Which clearly shows that sqsAuth shud be removed from event
On May 20, 2011 12:05 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.com
wrote:
This gets added
Problem is when i try to connect to a Qpid broker using our qpid client
libs in the Carbon environment it gives a Class not found Error when we try
to de serialize the message back to the Original format.
What is the class that it complains about?
Danushka
When using some application servers (i.e WebSphere, WebLogic), won't this be
an issue?
It should be an issue. I fixed a similar issue in Qpid last night.
Danushka
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
there is no need to add message box to AS.
thanks,
Amila.
Thanks,
Sameera
On Friday, May 20, 2011, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Which clearly shows that sqsAuth shud be removed from event
On May 20, 2011 12:05 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.com
wrote: This gets added
I should look at the ESB Message Store right?
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Charith Wickramarachchi
char...@wso2.comwrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Problem is when i try to connect to a Qpid broker using our qpid client
libs
Any idea why this message is printed?
Retrieving document at
'file:/home/danushka/development/carbon/trunk/products/mb/modules/distribution/product/target/wso2mb-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/tmp/temp2840560090810745821.txt'.
Retrieving schema at 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/', relative
to
I just ran through open JIRA's that were created during last couple of days
and assigned ones which should be looked into by the Event team. Respective
PM's please assign issues that are not intended to be handled by your team
as soon as you see them so that relevant teams can act on them quickly.
This should be a Carbon-core level fix right?.
Danushka
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Ranga Siriwardena ra...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was able to reproduce the issue for GS. Will work with Milinda to sorted
out the issue.
Thanks.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Krishantha
Eventing is no more.
Danushka
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Denis Weerasiri de...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
FYI, This component[1] export org.wso2.eventing.* but it has no any source
code.
[1] -
http://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/trunk/carbon/components/eventing/org.wso2.carbon.eventing.core/
Removed two log4j logs and committed but yet to find where the other two
system outs are coming from.
Danushka
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
[2011-05-13 01:16:47,997] INFO
{org.wso2.carbon.messagebox.internal.ds.MessageBoxServiceComponent} -
to check on this on the dev list. Will keep this thread updated.
Danushka
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Qpid client hangs while trying to close JMS session when its operation
(publish/subscribe) is unauthorised on server side. The issue
I can compile without any issue. What is the JDK version that you are
compiling with?
Danushka
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
compile:
[echo] Targeting : 1.5
[javac] Compiling 7 source files to
Qpid client hangs while trying to close JMS session when its operation
(publish/subscribe) is unauthorised on server side. The issue is that it
does not receive connection close commands (AMQP frames) in this case and
hence goes into a wait state.
It was found while fixing [1].
I am looking into
Amila,
Shall we make the property name something generic?
org.wso2.carbon.context.RequestBaseContext instead of
org.wso2.carbon.ldap.RequestBaseContext?
Thanks,
Danushka
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Amila Jayasekara ami...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All,
As per yesterdays discussion on
SVN client can be really buggy. I have experienced the code not getting
updated, despite the fact that the SVN client says the code is up to date.
In such situations, I have had to get a new checkout.
+1.
I have similar experience too.
Danushka
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
, which resulted in many wasted hours. The root
cause was CARBON_HOME has been set to something else in their bash_profile
files.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev
- HTTPS tunneling does not work
If I am not mistaken this was raised as a support issue and was fixed. It
was Rajika IIRC.
Thanks,
Danushka
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
+1.
I wonder why the Qpid bundle gets wired to the other Derby lib instead of
which is embedded?
Danushka
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.comwrote:
I think the right solution is to introduce a separate Derby bundle
(currently it's embedded in qpid). This
Even when the self-contained bundle does not import packages that are
embedded?
Danushka
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.comwrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
+1.
I wonder why the Qpid bundle gets
due to obvious
reasons ;-).
Thanks,
Danushka
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.comwrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Even when the self-contained bundle does not import packages that are
embedded?
Seems
Please update orbit/qpid/pom.xml and build. Replace your
components/plugins/qpid-0.11.0.wso2v1.jar with the newly built qpid orbit
bundle.
Danushka
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.comwrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus
:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Please update orbit/qpid/pom.xml and build. Replace your
components/plugins/qpid-0.11.0.wso2v1.jar with the newly built qpid orbit
bundle.
Seems to be fine now. Thanks for looking into this.
Thanks
I can not build the ESB because of missing syslogConfig.xml file. Most
probably I have not built a required feature, I can not locate it inside any
feature, though.
Any idea?
Thanks,
Danushka
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
Actually the NPE is coming from inside DefaultRealmService.java from the
following segment.
RealmConfiguration tenantRealmConfig = (RealmConfiguration)
tenantManager.getTenant(
tenantId).getRealmConfig();
Most probably the returned tenant reference is null. I can handle NPE
I just tried the same scenario that Supun tried with a fresh ESB build off
the latest trunk but could not reproduce the issue. I will handle NPE inside
the Qpid method anyway just to be on the safe side.
Danushka
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com wrote:
Did you
AmilaJ fixed the issue in DefaultRealmService as I heard.
Danushka
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Tharindu Mathew thari...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
We came up with this during smoke tests. Events published by ESB are not
being received by BAM due to this. I believe it's due to the qpid error.
Tharindu,
I just checked the DefaultDealmService.java but did not see any change.
Probably the fix went to some other place. Anyway the qpid authz plugin now
handles NPE. So, just update components/qpid and rebuild the BAM.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Afkham Azeez
I do not think event has anything to do with this error.
Danushka
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com wrote:
have you updated the event core with the current trunk or are you working
with some old ESB build?
thanks,
Amila.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM,
instead of -1.
I will add a null check to tenant, before getting RealmService; to
give a descriptive error message.
Thanks
AmilaJ
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Amila Jayasekara ami...@wso2.com wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.com
wrote
It still logs an error.
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com wrote:
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Amila,
I think there was some miscommunication. Supun, correct me if I am wrong.
Anyway I have now handled
You need to build features/event.
Please note that qpid gets installed as a result of installing event
feature.
Danushka
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Vijayaratha Vijayasingam
rat...@wso2.comwrote:
Nope still occurs..I got up from dependencies/qpid, orbit/qpid,
components/qpid then build
Kasun,
I think this is now fixed on the trunk. Shall we verify with a trunk
version?
Danushka
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Kasun Indrasiri ka...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
Latest ESB build[1] throws NPE while saving the synapse config. Please have
a look.
[2011-05-06 10:37:47,073] INFO -
] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-9596
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.com
wrote:
The issue here is that the messages are durable (persistent) but not the
queues and Qpid discards them at restart. The event implementation has now
modified to make
, May 4, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Event has been modified to make messages non-persistent by default as I
know. I will check with Amila.
Danushka
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Kasun Indrasiri ka...@wso2.com wrote:
Still getting this error[1
I see the port is open and directory service is on it.
Danushka
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.comwrote:
I see this in the latest MB pack I just built.
[2011-05-05 10:59:02,584] ERROR
{org.wso2.carbon.user.core.ldap.LDAPConnectionContext} - Error
It is intermittent. Server runs fine for some time and then starts to gives
this error.
Danushka
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.comwrote:
I see the port is open and directory service is on it.
Danushka
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Danushka
This is a result of adding the CSG agent into products. The SLF4J issue that
Azeez mentioned is also a result of that. So, removing JMS jar from Qpid
component is the right thing to do?
Danushka
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at
I am asking if what has been done is the right thing to do.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
This is a result of adding the CSG agent into products. The SLF4J issue
Hi Prabath,
You need to build features/event.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Prabath Siriwardena prab...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Dhanushka,
I took an up of following and built the ESB..
dependencies/qpid
orbit/qpid
features/qpid
Still I am getting the same error.. Am I
Rajika,
I meant this is a result of having the qpid-client-0.11.0.wso2v1.jar in
WEB-INF/lib that gets installed as a result of install the CSG agent. Is not
it so?
Danushka
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Danushka
, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.comwrote:
This is due to a contradiction in the way the default values used in Qpid.
The default heartbeat value in client properties is 120 whereas the default
min and max heartbeat values of a connection are 0. And it checks
I am looking into this as part of another issue.
Danushka
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Prabath Siriwardena prab...@wso2.comwrote:
From a latest build of ESB... Please have a look..
[2011-04-25 13:25:10,175] WARN
{org.apache.qpid.transport.ClientDelegate} - Ignoring the idle
timeout
on the Qpid list on this behaviour.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.comwrote:
I am looking into this as part of another issue.
Danushka
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Prabath Siriwardena prab...@wso2.comwrote:
From a latest build of ESB
I have built the ESB using the latest trunk.
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.synapse.transport.nhttp.HttpCoreNIOSender
at
org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findClassInternal(BundleLoader.java:489)
at
You need to update and build your dependencies/qpid.
Sorry that I missed this mail.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
NACK
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Prabath Siriwardena prab...@wso2.comwrote:
[2011-04-25 22:13:12,740]
It looks like the Qpid broker is already down when certain events get fired
at shutdown.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi,
I get the following errors every now and then when shutting down the ESB.
It doesn't happen consistently. But the problem
Or else bundles should have been deactivated in the right order?
Thanks,
Danushka
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.comwrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
It looks like the Qpid broker is already down when
Which features did you install?. Apparently event/qpid configuration files
have not been installed.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Kasun Indrasiri ka...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi devs,
We have fixed the issues related to ESB feature installation failures on a
carbon server.
I will take a look when I switch to Linux.
I doubt there is an issue installing configuration files when a feature is
installed as a dependency.
Danushka
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Kasun Indrasiri ka...@wso2.com wrote:
mediators feature
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Danushka
No it is not. The SSL port is read from the qpid-config.xml. The broker does
not accept it as an argument at star up so that it is not included in
carbon.xml. Let me check whats going wrong.
Danushka
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Tharindu Mathew thari...@wso2.com wrote:
Has qpid hardcoded
QPID_DEFAULT_SSL_PORT;
}
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.com
wrote:
No it is not. The SSL port is read from the qpid-config.xml. The broker
does not accept it as an argument at star up so that it is not included in
carbon.xml. Let me check whats
building the product.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
This is used by the CSG agent to get SSL port when creating connections.
What you get is a bind exception. We need to fix this anyway if the broker
reads the SSL port from
Azeez,
Qpid no longer maintains it's own log4j configuration. You are using an
updated qpid feature with an old qpid dependency. All these logging issues
were fixed a couple of days back. Please follow the thread Logging Issues @
ESB startup on carbon-dev@.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011
What does the transport receiver say?
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.com wrote:
The request/response two way JMS scenario is failing with a trunk build of
Qpid component when I tested with CSG. This was used to work earlier and
also note that this is critical
receive the set of logs that I pointed earlier.
Rajika
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.com
wrote:
What does the transport receiver say?
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri raj...@wso2.comwrote:
The request/response two way JMS scenario
As I remember the geronimo-jms jar has now been integrated into the core. So
it should be enough to have it inside lib/core. Sameera please correct me if
I am wrong.
Danushka
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Why was this jar in 2 locations? Why can't we have
Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
As you said ESB uses its own log4j configuration right?. It looks like it
gets overridden. I will take a look.
Danushka
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
This happens when Qpid recovers persisted messages at start up. The issue in
this case is that your messages (JMS) are persistent but not your queues and
hence it discards messages.
FYI.
JMS message are persistent by default but not queues. Therefore Qpid
persists all messages by default. When
And any idea what these messages are? Are those events generated by the
registry?
Yes I guess so.
If not you have used a proxy over JMS?
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
the queues persistent by default or
provide any other suitable solution, so it just works.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka hira...@wso2.comwrote:
Danushka,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.com
wrote:
This happens when Qpid recovers
1 - 100 of 276 matches
Mail list logo
