+1. This is good suggestion IMO.
Thanks,
sanjeewa.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne <
thusit...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Ishara,
>
> IMHO this is a valid requirement. But as Vidura mentioned ATM we don;t
> support dynamic binding from MSF4J.
> So we need to implement this
Hi Ishara,
IMHO this is a valid requirement. But as Vidura mentioned ATM we don;t
support dynamic binding from MSF4J.
So we need to implement this from MSF4J level. Then we can provide the
ability to add/remove interceptors at the runtime.
@Azeez, Kishanthan WDYT?
Thanks
Thusitha
On Mon, Jun
+ architecture
I
f you are asking about the dynamic interceptors similar to the dynamic
binding of filters in JAX-RS spec [1], MSF4J currently do not support
dynamic binding of interceptors.
[1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_
Hi Ishara,
So, can we have the support to be able to plug custom interceptors for
> microservices?
I
f you are asking about the dynamic interceptors similar to the dynamic
binding of filters in JAX-RS spec [1], MSF4J currently do not support
dynamic binding of interceptors.
[1]
Thanks for the clarification Vidura.
So, can we have the support to be able to plug custom interceptors for
microservices?
Thanks & Regards,
Ishara Cooray
Senior Software Engineer
Mobile : +9477 262 9512
WSO2, Inc. | http://wso2.com/
Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:02
Hi Ishara,
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Ishara Cooray wrote:
> According to the new Interceptor support in msf4j-2.3.0-m2
>
> AFAIU,
> We can bind interceptors for a given microservice as below.
>
> InterceptorService is the micro service that is going to be intercepted by
According to the new Interceptor support in msf4j-2.3.0-m2
AFAIU,
We can bind interceptors for a given microservice as below.
InterceptorService is the micro service that is going to be
intercepted by RequestInterceptors and Responseinterceptors annotated
by
@RequestInterceptor and