Yes but that's the limitation we need to fix! Its not too hard .. its
recursive application of the same rules :).
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Ruchira Wageesha ruch...@wso2.com wrote:
In the old model, it generates functions like [1] for operations. But when
it is a service with complex
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana sanj...@wso2.comwrote:
Yes but that's the limitation we need to fix! Its not too hard .. its
recursive application of the same rules :).
If we can solve it that way, then it would be ideal. Anyway, I didn't get
the exact idea behind the
In the old model, it generates functions like [1] for operations. But when
it is a service with complex types, most probably function signature would
be [2]. In [2] userInfo is the whole soap body and we need to construct it
manually. No help from the stub for soap body creation.
[1] function
Why do we need to re-invent a solution .. can the JAX-WS style binding
model not work? What we had was a similar model in the old mashup server.
W.r.t. complex schemas- I don't understand why the old model doesn't
support complex types. Note that I'm talking about the model not the XSLT
based
I scheduled a discussion for next week --Srinath
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Nuwan Bandara nu...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Are we shipping this for C4 release?
No. We were discussing about the subject as an intern
Hi All,
We are in the process of refactoring the SOAP web service JavaScript stub.
Before going through that, I need to highlight few stuff and come up with a
proper decision/architecture about the JS stub.
Old Stub of MS
=
Old stub was mainly writted thinking about services in MS
Are we shipping this for C4 release?
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ruchira Wageesha ruch...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All,
We are in the process of refactoring the SOAP web service JavaScript stub.
Before going through that, I need to highlight few stuff and come up with a
proper
Hi
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Are we shipping this for C4 release?
No. We were discussing about the subject as an intern project. But we do
not see a perfect solution. We believe the current state of the JSStub is
much more convenient for all
