[Dev] Update on BAM Task migration

2012-03-26 Thread Prabath Abeysekera
Hi all, I've been working on the $subject and currently there's only one task remaining to be completed. The main intention of this effort is to migrate the existing task implementation of BAM to ntasks which is a quartz based task scheduler component introduced a couple of months back. While

Re: [Dev] Update on BAM Task migration

2012-03-26 Thread Buddhika Chamith
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Prabath Abeysekera praba...@wso2.comwrote: Hi all, I've been working on the $subject and currently there's only one task remaining to be completed. The main intention of this effort is to migrate the existing task implementation of BAM to ntasks which is a

Re: [Dev] Update on BAM Task migration

2012-03-26 Thread Tharindu Mathew
The reason that ntask expects string key value pairs is to be able to execute tasks in a distributed manner. As part of completing the task, you should setup a few nodes and check whether tasks are distributed appropriately and in a fail over manner. Also, try to expose some MXBeans to check how

Re: [Dev] Update on BAM Task migration

2012-03-26 Thread Prabath Abeysekera
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Tharindu Mathew thari...@wso2.com wrote: The reason that ntask expects string key value pairs is to be able to execute tasks in a distributed manner. As part of completing the task, you should setup a few nodes and check whether tasks are distributed

Re: [Dev] Update on BAM Task migration

2012-03-26 Thread Senaka Fernando
Hi Prabath, Great, and by the way, the ntask component is working perfectly fine, and it has been integrated into G-Reg. I'm just wondering whether these changes would in anyway impact the existing component? Thanks, Senaka. On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Prabath Abeysekera