Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 Proposal 18 - CLI Tool for WSO2 Identity Server

Hi Anuradha, Thanks for interesting about this project and this would be a different experience than the other projects that is covered an industry domain(Security) and the enterprise level product tooling. Basically, Identity Server is almost matured product and now we are re-writing IS on top

Re: [Dev] [IS-6] Need clarifications on Unique claim(s) as user identifier in Identity Server

Hi Johann, On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Johann Nallathamby wrote: > Hi Isura, > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Isura Karunaratne wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Johann Nallathamby >> wrote: >> >>> Hi

[Dev] Test automation tool - GSoC Proposal 13

Hi All, I am a final year student in MIT, University of Kelaniya. I went through the proposals in GSoC 2017 and I am interested in $subject. I followed the reference given in the documentation. But need to get more details on above task. Can someone please explain more about the expected product

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 - Real-Time Machine Learning Toolkit for Siddhi

[Looping the mentors] Hi Satyarth, Thanks for your interest in the project. Mentors would get back to you with more details. Would you mind letting us know the date you will be passed out? On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Satyarth Praveen wrote: > Hello everyone, > >

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 - Real-Time Machine Learning Toolkit for Siddhi

Hi Nirmal, My exams and project submissions will get over by the end of May. And tentatively, the final results will be out by the end of June or by July. If it's not an issue, may I know the requirement of this detail, please? Thanks Regards, Satyarth Praveen On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:58 PM,

Re: [Dev] Issue when running UUFMicroservice on top of IBM JDK 8

Hi Thusitha, On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne < thusit...@wso2.com> wrote: > It seems that IBM JDK doesn't contain the particular class whereas Oracle > and OpenJDK contain the class. According to[1] we are recommending Oracle > and Open JDK only. Therefore we may

Re: [Dev] [IS-6] Need clarifications on Unique claim(s) as user identifier in Identity Server

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Thanuja Jayasinghe wrote: > Hi Johann, > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Johann Nallathamby > wrote: > >> Hi Isura, >> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Isura Karunaratne >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>>

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 - Real-Time Machine Learning Toolkit for Siddhi

Yes, I think you're good. On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Satyarth Praveen wrote: > Oh ok. > So as per the details, I am eligible, right? > > Regards, > Satyarth Praveen > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > >> Thanks,

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 - Real-Time Machine Learning Toolkit for Siddhi

Thanks, Satyarth. It's to verify your eligibility as per the GSoC rules: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/rules/ On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Satyarth Praveen wrote: > Hi Nirmal, > My exams and project submissions will get over by the end of May. > And

Re: [Dev] Issue when running UUFMicroservice on top of IBM JDK 8

It seems that IBM JDK doesn't contain the particular class whereas Oracle and OpenJDK contain the class. According to[1] we are recommending Oracle and Open JDK only. Therefore we may have to decide whether we should support IBM JDK as well. [1] -

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 - Real-Time Machine Learning Toolkit for Siddhi

Oh ok. So as per the details, I am eligible, right? Regards, Satyarth Praveen On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > Thanks, Satyarth. It's to verify your eligibility as per the GSoC rules: > https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/rules/ > > On Wed, Feb 22,

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 - Real-Time Machine Learning Toolkit for Siddhi

Great. Thanks. Regards, Satyarth Praveen On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > Yes, I think you're good. > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Satyarth Praveen > wrote: > >> Oh ok. >> So as per the details, I am eligible, right? >>

Re: [Dev] Issue when running UUFMicroservice on top of IBM JDK 8

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne < thusit...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi Sajith, > > I agree that using JDK private/internal classes might cause undesired > issues in the future. We might need to figure out some other way to cater > the UUF requirement in order to change the

[Dev] Test Cases for WebSocket in Carbon-Transport

Hi all, Please review the PR and give feedback. https://github.com/wso2/carbon-transports/pull/223 Thanks, Irunika *Irunika Weeraratne* *Software Engineer | WSO2, Inc. * *Email : irun...@wso2.com * *LinkedIn : https://lk.linkedin.com/in/irunika

Re: [Dev] Issue when running UUFMicroservice on top of IBM JDK 8

Hi Sajith, I agree that using JDK private/internal classes might cause undesired issues in the future. We might need to figure out some other way to cater the UUF requirement in order to change the Service path at Runtime. I've created the issue[1] to track this. [1] -

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 - Proposal 22: [Platform Security] Security Testing as a Service with Docker Containerization

Hi Pavithra, You can use WSO2 Integration Cloud[1] as the cloud service provider for your project[2]. For implementing *Cloud based security testing service *you can try out [1] docker image. My recommendation is to play with it locally and create your own docker image and deploy as a cloud

Re: [Dev] Test automation tool - GSoC Proposal 13

(Adding mentor) On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Erandi Ganepola wrote: > Hi All, > > I am a final year student in MIT, University of Kelaniya. I went through > the proposals in GSoC 2017 and I am interested in $subject. I followed the > reference given in the

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 Proposal 24

Hi Sujeeharan, According to GSoC rules, you can't participate the program as a group https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/rules/ Sorry! On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Upul Bandara wrote: > Hi Sujeeharan, > > We are glad to see your interest! > > The main objective of this