Re: [Dev] [PC]Unable to change states in lifecycle

2016-07-31 Thread Thilini Cooray
Hi, On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Yasima Dewmini wrote: > Hi Thilini, > > Only thing I'm doing is changing the permission of the user roles to deny > the write permission. > When trying to change state following error comes. > > As I mentioned above, the lifecycle executor

Re: [Dev] [PC]Unable to change states in lifecycle

2016-07-31 Thread Yasima Dewmini
Hi Thilini, Only thing I'm doing is changing the permission of the user roles to deny the write permission. When trying to change state following error comes. [2016-08-01 11:17:01,378] ERROR {rxt.asset} - Failed to invoke action: Submit for the asset of id:

[Dev] [Architecture] WSO2 Application Server 6.0.0-M3 Released !

2016-07-31 Thread Chanaka Cooray
WSO2 Application Server 6.0.0-M3 Released ! Welcome to WSO2 Application Server, the successor of WSO2 Carbon based Application Server. WSO2 Application Server 6.0.0 is a complete revamp and is based on vanilla Apache Tomcat. WSO2 provides a number of features by means of extensions to Tomcat to

Re: [Dev] [PC]Unable to change states in lifecycle

2016-07-31 Thread Thilini Cooray
Hi, Unless the executor itself doesn't try to update any resources, the process owner does not require write access. Do you observe any server side errors mentioning user not authorized to access the resource etc.? Thanks. On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Yasima Dewmini wrote:

[Dev] [PC]Unable to change states in lifecycle

2016-07-31 Thread Yasima Dewmini
Hi, I'm creating a new life cycle for PC. I want to remove write permission of the process owner when the process is in In-Review state. So, I wrote an executor to be executed at Development state to remove that permission. When write permission is removed, the process owner is not allowed to

Re: [Dev] Fwd: GSOC2016: [ML][CEP] [SAMOA]Predictive analytic with online data for WSO2 Machine Learner-Samoa Integration

2016-07-31 Thread Mahesh Dananjaya
Hi Maheshakya, I have a small problem. As we did all the time when i build a samoa streaming extension for the cep by providing samoa dependencies, i put that jar into cep_home/repository/component/lib/ folder.The start cep and try to develop the execution plan by providing my extension. i am

[Dev] [DEV][C5] Cannot build product-mb with UUF dependency

2016-07-31 Thread Sajini De Silva
Hi, org.wso2.carbon.andes.rest.service.feature.group 3.5.0.SNAPSHOT requires package org.wso2.msf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0). We also have another dependency for org.wso2.carbon.uufW. org.wso2.carbon.uuf uses org.wso2.msf4j 2.0.0 version only in 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version. We have a dependency for

Re: [Dev] SnakeYAML is already an OSGi bundle. Why do we have SnakeYAML in orbit?

2016-07-31 Thread Shan Mahanama
Hi Isuru, Sorry about the delay to reply. We are looking into this issue and will fix this in the next version (5.2.0). Thanks, Shan. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Isuru Perera wrote: > Hi Shan, > > Any updates on this? > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Shan Mahanama

Re: [Dev] GSoC2016-Contact Development Team Feature

2016-07-31 Thread Kavith Lokuhewage
Hi Nathiesha, How is the progress on converting project to a maven project? Please let us know if you face any issues. BTW, [1] is a good article on osgi services with eclipse plugins. We can use them for further decoupling publishers and report generators. Thanks, [1]

Re: [Dev] [GSoC Dockerfiles] Meeting minutes

2016-07-31 Thread Abhishek Tiwari
Hi All, I have updated the instructions to build and run the test framework [1]. I am also able to build kubernetes platform on Mac OSX. [1]. https://github.com/abhishek0198/test-framework Thanks Abhishek On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Abhishek Tiwari < abhishek.tiwari0...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [Dev] [GSoC Dockerfiles] Meeting minutes

2016-07-31 Thread Abhishek Tiwari
Hi Imesh, The project is currently structured around standard Golang project created by eclipse, you can add eclipse plugin, create a new project with existing sources and it should compile fine. I will add complete instructions on Github and update this thread. Chamila, The tests I am working

Re: [Dev] [IS] EC2 Performance Analysis : Sudden TPS drop in User Add in 500 concurrency with 10million users

2016-07-31 Thread Bhathiya Jayasekara
Hi Ishara, On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Ishara Karunarathna wrote: > > With 2s worm up and then 10s ramp up period > Earlier we had a ramp up period of 60s. Not sure that has any effect here. Just mentioning. Thanks, Bhathiya Did you look at the behaviour of

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016 - Project 21 : MongoDB Userstore Development

2016-07-31 Thread Asantha Thilina
Hi Tharindu, yes sure i am comfortable with any time and look forward for that Thanks, Asantha On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Tharindu Edirisinghe wrote: > Hi Asantha, > > Good work so far. Since we are reaching the final stage of GSoC, let's > have a hangout at the end

Re: [Dev] [IS] EC2 Performance Analysis : Sudden TPS drop in User Add in 500 concurrency with 10million users

2016-07-31 Thread Ishara Karunarathna
Hi Prabath, Maduranga is running same test in the openstack once its completed will compare all. BR, Ishara On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Prabath Siriwardana wrote: > Can you please compare the results you are getting now with the results we > got a week before in the

Re: [Dev] [IS] EC2 Performance Analysis : Sudden TPS drop in User Add in 500 concurrency with 10million users

2016-07-31 Thread Prabath Siriwardana
Can you please compare the results you are getting now with the results we got a week before in the same setup...? I guess we could get ~1200 tps with 500 concurrency for 1M users, without any drop in the tps...? Thanks & regards, -Prabath On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Ishara Karunarathna

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016 - Project 21 : MongoDB Userstore Development

2016-07-31 Thread Tharindu Edirisinghe
Hi Asantha, Good work so far. Since we are reaching the final stage of GSoC, let's have a hangout at the end of this week and plan the final steps to complete the project. I will go through the deliverables and provide feedback soon. Thanks, Tharindu On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Asantha

Re: [Dev] [IoTS] when will the IoTS be GA?

2016-07-31 Thread Sumedha Rubasinghe
Hi Jason, UIs in IoTS Master is not fully functional due to on going work I mentioned b4. Will get back to you with an alternative plan by tomorrow. On Jul 31, 2016 2:48 PM, "云展智创" wrote: Hi Sumedha, Yes, I thought the IoTS would be GA on mid of July. I have a project

Re: [Dev] [IoTS] when will the IoTS be GA?

2016-07-31 Thread 云展智创
Hi Sumedha, Yes, I thought the IoTS would be GA on mid of July. I have a project using IoTS to manage some smart devices. IoTS is the core backend component in the project. I also need the cdmf-devicetype-archetype tools to create the plugins. Could you give me some advices on how to build

Re: [Dev] [IS] EC2 Performance Analysis : Sudden TPS drop in User Add in 500 concurrency with 10million users

2016-07-31 Thread Ishara Karunarathna
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Malith Jayasinghe wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Ishara Karunarathna > wrote: > >> Hi Malith, >> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Malith Jayasinghe >> wrote: >> >>> HI Indunil, >>> Just

Re: [Dev] [IS] EC2 Performance Analysis : Sudden TPS drop in User Add in 500 concurrency with 10million users

2016-07-31 Thread Malith Jayasinghe
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Ishara Karunarathna wrote: > Hi Malith, > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Malith Jayasinghe > wrote: > >> HI Indunil, >> Just a few question regarding this performance test you have done: >> >> What is the reason for

Re: [Dev] [IS] EC2 Performance Analysis : Sudden TPS drop in User Add in 500 concurrency with 10million users

2016-07-31 Thread Ishara Karunarathna
Hi Malith, On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Malith Jayasinghe wrote: > HI Indunil, > Just a few question regarding this performance test you have done: > > What is the reason for selecting the concurrency = 500 here? > This is the user expected concurrency level. Thats the

Re: [Dev] [IS] EC2 Performance Analysis : Sudden TPS drop in User Add in 500 concurrency with 10million users

2016-07-31 Thread Malith Jayasinghe
HI Indunil, Just a few question regarding this performance test you have done: What is the reason for selecting the concurrency = 500 here? Have you tested the behaviour for lower concurrency levels? *"currently the TPS is dropping from the initial TPS 1139.5/s to 198.1/s in around 610 user