Hi,
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Yasima Dewmini wrote:
> Hi Thilini,
>
> Only thing I'm doing is changing the permission of the user roles to deny
> the write permission.
> When trying to change state following error comes.
>
>
As I mentioned above, the lifecycle executor
Hi Thilini,
Only thing I'm doing is changing the permission of the user roles to deny
the write permission.
When trying to change state following error comes.
[2016-08-01 11:17:01,378] ERROR {rxt.asset} - Failed to invoke action:
Submit for the asset of id:
WSO2 Application Server 6.0.0-M3 Released !
Welcome to WSO2 Application Server, the successor of WSO2 Carbon based
Application Server. WSO2 Application Server 6.0.0 is a complete revamp and
is based on vanilla Apache Tomcat. WSO2 provides a number of features by
means of extensions to Tomcat to
Hi,
Unless the executor itself doesn't try to update any resources, the process
owner does not require write access.
Do you observe any server side errors mentioning user not authorized to
access the resource etc.?
Thanks.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Yasima Dewmini wrote:
Hi,
I'm creating a new life cycle for PC. I want to remove write permission of
the process owner when the process is in In-Review state. So, I wrote an
executor to be executed at Development state to remove that permission.
When write permission is removed, the process owner is not allowed to
Hi Maheshakya,
I have a small problem. As we did all the time when i build a samoa
streaming extension for the cep by providing samoa dependencies, i put that
jar into cep_home/repository/component/lib/ folder.The start cep and try to
develop the execution plan by providing my extension. i am
Hi,
org.wso2.carbon.andes.rest.service.feature.group 3.5.0.SNAPSHOT
requires package org.wso2.msf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0). We also have another
dependency for org.wso2.carbon.uufW. org.wso2.carbon.uuf uses
org.wso2.msf4j 2.0.0 version only in 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version.
We have a dependency for
Hi Isuru,
Sorry about the delay to reply. We are looking into this issue and will fix
this in the next version (5.2.0).
Thanks,
Shan.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Isuru Perera wrote:
> Hi Shan,
>
> Any updates on this?
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Shan Mahanama
Hi Nathiesha,
How is the progress on converting project to a maven project? Please let us
know if you face any issues.
BTW, [1] is a good article on osgi services with eclipse plugins. We can
use them for further decoupling publishers and report generators.
Thanks,
[1]
Hi All,
I have updated the instructions to build and run the test framework [1]. I
am also able to build kubernetes platform on Mac OSX.
[1]. https://github.com/abhishek0198/test-framework
Thanks
Abhishek
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Abhishek Tiwari <
abhishek.tiwari0...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Imesh,
The project is currently structured around standard Golang project created
by eclipse, you can add eclipse plugin, create a new project with existing
sources and it should compile fine. I will add complete instructions on
Github and update this thread.
Chamila,
The tests I am working
Hi Ishara,
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Ishara Karunarathna
wrote:
>
> With 2s worm up and then 10s ramp up period
>
Earlier we had a ramp up period of 60s. Not sure that has any effect here.
Just mentioning.
Thanks,
Bhathiya
Did you look at the behaviour of
Hi Tharindu,
yes sure i am comfortable with any time and look forward for that
Thanks,
Asantha
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Tharindu Edirisinghe
wrote:
> Hi Asantha,
>
> Good work so far. Since we are reaching the final stage of GSoC, let's
> have a hangout at the end
Hi Prabath,
Maduranga is running same test in the openstack once its completed will
compare all.
BR,
Ishara
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Prabath Siriwardana
wrote:
> Can you please compare the results you are getting now with the results we
> got a week before in the
Can you please compare the results you are getting now with the results we
got a week before in the same setup...? I guess we could get ~1200 tps
with 500 concurrency for 1M users, without any drop in the tps...?
Thanks & regards,
-Prabath
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Ishara Karunarathna
Hi Asantha,
Good work so far. Since we are reaching the final stage of GSoC, let's have
a hangout at the end of this week and plan the final steps to complete the
project.
I will go through the deliverables and provide feedback soon.
Thanks,
Tharindu
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Asantha
Hi Jason,
UIs in IoTS Master is not fully functional due to on going work I mentioned
b4.
Will get back to you with an alternative plan by tomorrow.
On Jul 31, 2016 2:48 PM, "云展智创" wrote:
Hi Sumedha,
Yes, I thought the IoTS would be GA on mid of July. I have a project
Hi Sumedha,
Yes, I thought the IoTS would be GA on mid of July. I have a project using IoTS
to manage some smart devices. IoTS is the core backend component in the
project. I also need the cdmf-devicetype-archetype tools to create the
plugins. Could you give me some advices on how to build
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Malith Jayasinghe
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Ishara Karunarathna
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Malith,
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Malith Jayasinghe
>> wrote:
>>
>>> HI Indunil,
>>> Just
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Ishara Karunarathna
wrote:
> Hi Malith,
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Malith Jayasinghe
> wrote:
>
>> HI Indunil,
>> Just a few question regarding this performance test you have done:
>>
>> What is the reason for
Hi Malith,
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Malith Jayasinghe
wrote:
> HI Indunil,
> Just a few question regarding this performance test you have done:
>
> What is the reason for selecting the concurrency = 500 here?
>
This is the user expected concurrency level. Thats the
HI Indunil,
Just a few question regarding this performance test you have done:
What is the reason for selecting the concurrency = 500 here?
Have you tested the behaviour for lower concurrency levels?
*"currently the TPS is dropping from the initial TPS 1139.5/s to 198.1/s in
around 610 user
22 matches
Mail list logo