Re: [Dev] [DEV][APIM][C5] - Caching requirement for OAuth2 protected microservices

2017-02-23 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Uvindra Dias Jayasinha wrote: > This will function like any of the local container classes we use(example: > HashMap). I think its fine to use one of the available implementations(such > as Guava since we already have it as a dependency) for

Re: [Dev] [DEV][APIM][C5] - Caching requirement for OAuth2 protected microservices

2017-02-23 Thread Uvindra Dias Jayasinha
This will function like any of the local container classes we use(example: HashMap). I think its fine to use one of the available implementations(such as Guava since we already have it as a dependency) for this. Testing will reveal its suitability but I don't anticipate any issues since this is

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017

2017-02-23 Thread Vihanga Liyanage
Hi all, I hope you read my reply to the other mail tread, "Eclipse plugin for Siddhi". As I said in there, we can use same Xtext[1] framework to develop Siddhi plugins for both eclipse and Intellij IDEA editors. Here are my example idea plugin project details. You can find the code in here[2].

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 - Proposal 20: [IS] OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol Support

2017-02-23 Thread Ishara Karunarathna
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Dinuksha Ishwari < dinuksha.ishw...@gmail.com> wrote: [+ dev] > Hi Ishara, > > Thank you for the information. I'm in the process of reading the related > specifications and getting familiar with the code base further. Will get > back to you soon. > > Thanks, >

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2017 - Proposal 20: [IS] OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol Support

2017-02-23 Thread Ishara Karunarathna
Hi Dinuksha, Thank you for your interest in GSoC and the effort on WSO2IS DCRM implementation. It’s great that you have already started working with IS code base. Further you can go through current DCR implementation from here[1] and go through that code. You may find open jiras here[2].

[Dev] GSOC 2017 - Test Automation Tool

2017-02-23 Thread Uditha Kasun
Hi All, I am Uditha Kasun Senavirathna, a 3rd year Software Engineering undergraduate student from Sri Lanka Institute Of Information Technology. I am interested in implementing your GSOC 2017 proposal for a Test Automation Tool. I currently have some experience with test automation using

Re: [Dev] Test automation tool - GSoC Proposal 13

2017-02-23 Thread Dharshana Warusavitharana
Hi Erandi, Thank you for the interest in this project. This project mainly focuses on automatic test case generation based on given instruction set. In this case, its implementation is on steps provided in a document. You have to use NLP to derive a common medium something like XML/JSON to

Re: [Dev] Test automation tool - GSoC Proposal 13

2017-02-23 Thread Nuwan Silva
Adding DharshanaW On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Erandi Ganepola wrote: > Hi All, > > I am a final year student in MIT, University of Kelaniya. I went through > the proposals in GSoC 2017 and I am interested in $subject. I followed the > reference given in the

[Dev] Traffic Manager HA deployment on DC/OS

2017-02-23 Thread JOSE MARIA ALVAREZ FERNANDEZ
Hi all,As you may know, we are implementing WSO2 in El Corte Ingles, and we are trying to fit Traffic Manager in our architecture, based on DC/OS and containers. We would like to know which approach you think it may be better for the Traffic Manager component. As we are in a PaaS system, we would

[Dev] Fixed the Issue with Testng Configurations

2017-02-23 Thread Irunika Weeraratne
Hi all, There was a problem with testng is not aware of the test classes configured in the testng.xml. Please find the following PR fixing the problem. Please review and merge. https://github.com/wso2/carbon-transports/pull/226 Thanks, Irunika *Irunika Weeraratne* *Software Engineer | WSO2, Inc.

Re: [Dev] [IS 6.0.0] Making native claim dialect configurable

2017-02-23 Thread Omindu Rathnaweera
One of the advantages would be that we can avoid the overhead of claim transformation. Regards, Omindu. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Omindu Rathnaweera wrote: > Do we need to make the native claim dialect configurable ? AFAIK it is not > configurable and we are using a

[Dev] [IS 6.0.0] Making native claim dialect configurable

2017-02-23 Thread Omindu Rathnaweera
Do we need to make the native claim dialect configurable ? AFAIK it is not configurable and we are using a hardcoded constant for the dialect URI ( http://wso2.org/claims). Regards, Omindu -- Omindu Rathnaweera Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. Mobile: +94 771 197 211