On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Johann Nallathamby wrote:
> Hi Danushka,
>
> Did you see [1]? The thread talks about a single config file for the most
> commonly changed config files. However the thread doesn't seem to have a
> conclusion.
>
> @Kernel Team,
> Is this something
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Ruwan Abeykoon wrote:
> Hi All,
> @Johann
> I think security questions/account recovery options should not be treated
> as server-configurations. I would rather consider them as the runtime data
> much like the SP/IdP data. Hence single server
Hi All,
@Johann
I think security questions/account recovery options should not be treated
as server-configurations. I would rather consider them as the runtime data
much like the SP/IdP data. Hence single server config does not apply for
this case IMO.
>>Each component must pass its own
Johan
Problem with reading from seperate places is like this. How we have read
yaml files is using snakeyaml library, we create a class with parameters as
same name as yaml file properties. And we pass this class and we retrieve
object of that mapping bean. So how should we achieve that?
One idea
Hi Danushka,
Did you see [1]? The thread talks about a single config file for the most
commonly changed config files. However the thread doesn't seem to have a
conclusion.
@Kernel Team,
Is this something we have completed implementing? If so can you share some
latest details of how we should be
Hi All
We are currently working on setting challenge questions feature for IS
6.0.0-M1. We need some configurations specific to security questions /
account recovery section. In C4 based products it was in identity.xml which
is the server configuration. In C5 code we dont have created a such file.