Hi Thusitha,
Thank you very much for the info.
Hi Azeez,
I am afraid I can check this ATM as I am tied with support work. I will
check with someone with the team and ask to verify this.
Thanks!
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 8:16 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> Malintha can you please look into that PR?
Malintha can you please look into that PR?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 6:34 AM Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne <
thusithathil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Malintha,
>
> AFAIK this was not implemented.
> It seems like there is an open PR relate to this. IMHO that can be merged
> to get the PATCH support if the
Hi Malintha,
AFAIK this was not implemented.
It seems like there is an open PR relate to this. IMHO that can be merged
to get the PATCH support if the PR looks good.
[1] - https://github.com/wso2/msf4j/pull/546
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:29 AM Malintha Amarasinghe
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just
Hi all,
Just wanted to check whether we were able to implement this? Looking at the
code I guess we do not support PATCH in msf4j yet [1]. We have some
requirements to implement partial update operations in SCIM2 API via msf4j:
Eg: Adding a user to an existing group without updating the whole
Created issue[1] to track this.
[1] - https://github.com/wso2/msf4j/issues/357
Thanks
Thusitha
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne <
> thusit...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Azeez,
>>
>> Since we
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne <
thusit...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Azeez,
>
> Since we restructured swagger support as a separate dependency, if we use
> swagger PATCH annotation then we have to bring swagger dependency again to
> the core. That will increase the
Hi Azeez,
Since we restructured swagger support as a separate dependency, if we use
swagger PATCH annotation then we have to bring swagger dependency again to
the core. That will increase the minimum jar size. Therefore IMHO it would
be better if we implement the PATCH annotation without
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> Someone suggested on SO to use the PATCH annotation from io.swagger.jaxrs
>
> That may be a good alternative since we already support Swagger.
>
Thanks for the alternative so we can go with io.swagger.jaxrs.PATCH.
>
> On
Someone suggested on SO to use the PATCH annotation from io.swagger.jaxrs
That may be a good alternative since we already support Swagger.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> We can add that annotation to MSF4J itself.
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:28 PM,
We can add that annotation to MSF4J itself.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since javax.ws.rs does not provide http verb PATCH we have to have custom
> Patch annotation as below.
>
>
Hi All,
Since javax.ws.rs does not provide http verb PATCH we have to have custom
Patch annotation as below.
@Target({ElementType.METHOD})@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)@HttpMethod("PATCH")public
@interface PATCH {}
Is it ok to have this annotation in component level or is there any common
11 matches
Mail list logo