On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne <
thusit...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Sajith,
>
> I agree that using JDK private/internal classes might cause undesired
> issues in the future. We might need to figure out some other way to cater
> the UUF requirement in order to change the
Hi Sajith,
I agree that using JDK private/internal classes might cause undesired
issues in the future. We might need to figure out some other way to cater
the UUF requirement in order to change the Service path at Runtime.
I've created the issue[1] to track this.
[1] -
Hi Thusitha,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne <
thusit...@wso2.com> wrote:
> It seems that IBM JDK doesn't contain the particular class whereas Oracle
> and OpenJDK contain the class. According to[1] we are recommending Oracle
> and Open JDK only. Therefore we may
It seems that IBM JDK doesn't contain the particular class whereas Oracle
and OpenJDK contain the class. According to[1] we are recommending Oracle
and Open JDK only. Therefore we may have to decide whether we should
support IBM JDK as well.
[1] -
According to [2] (see "Oracle content" section) IBM JDK 8 has Nashorn in
it. So, UUF should work in IBM JDK :).
Regarding your issue, According to the error log in [1] it seems like a CNF
problem. Log says the it cannot find "java.lang.Class$Atomic" class. CNF
exception is thrown from the static
Hi,
When starting the IS 6.0.0 pack on top of IBM JDK 8 latest version we get
the error reported at [1].
The other microservices in the pack are added without an issue. I also
tested a micro service sample and it works fine on ibm jdk.
But when come to
