RE: xmlbeans and maven 2

2006-06-26 Thread Tatu Saloranta
--- Cezar Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi David, > > We appreciate very much your help and involvement. > > 1. The tests we run and the releases we have are > using the jsr173-api > jar bundled inside the release files. The sources > for this jar can be > found from Jsr 173 official pag

RE: A small issue about the behavior of the returned XMLStreamReader

2006-03-22 Thread Tatu Saloranta
> > Hi all, > > A quick clarification about the behavior of the > XMLStreamReader > > returned from a XMLBeans object. > > If there are any qualified attributes the reader > correctly returns the > > namespace URI and the prefix for that attribute > through the > > getAttributePrefix(int) and > get

Re: Problems

2005-11-24 Thread Tatu Saloranta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,I've got a Problem.I cannot start the "getting started" example, because the package "Javax.xml.stream" is not found. Where I can find this package? This would the StAX (JSR-173) API. One location for downloading it is: http://dist.codehaus.org/stax/jars/stax-api-1.0.ja

Re: Legal issue: Considering Sun's JSR173 implementation over Bea's

2005-07-27 Thread Tatu Saloranta
--- Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aside from the license issue, you might be > interested in woodstox. I've > found its about 33% faster than the RI. > > http://woodstox.codehuas.org codehaus ;-) WRT Sun's implementation, keep in mind t

Re: License of jsr173_api.jar?

2005-07-06 Thread Tatu Saloranta
--- Panu Hällfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, everybody! > > XMLBeans 2.0.0 seems to include jsr173_api.jar, > which is > apparently from Sun. Is it? Panu, that jar includes StAX API, which was developed as part of JCP 173. It's probably used to allow XMLBeans to use any of stax-based XM