RE: Legal issue: Considering Sun's JSR173 implementation over Bea's

2005-08-16 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 10:26 -0700, Cezar Andrei wrote: We (the committers for XMLBeans) are actively working on this. It is definitely an issue and we apologize for the delay - but we want to get it right - so we are actively talking to the lawyers on how to resolve this and unfortunately

Re: Legal issue: Considering Sun's JSR173 implementation over Bea's

2005-07-27 Thread Dan Diephouse
Aside from the license issue, you might be interested in woodstox. I've found its about 33% faster than the RI. http://woodstox.codehuas.org - Dan Panu Hällfors wrote: Good morning! I'm returning to the jsr173_api.jar licensing issue I noted about some time ago. We've found out that the

Re: Legal issue: Considering Sun's JSR173 implementation over Bea's

2005-07-27 Thread Tatu Saloranta
--- Dan Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aside from the license issue, you might be interested in woodstox. I've found its about 33% faster than the RI. http://woodstox.codehuas.org codehaus ;-) WRT Sun's implementation, keep in mind that