Hello,
The Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection [0] mentions a list of
datasets that are available for use and analysis from their site. The
datasets are mainly graph datasets on various Internet activities such as
on-line community interaction and reddit posts, amazon product and customer
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1266
@bzz
>In my experience if PR author try to follow such steps - that speeds up
the review process by order of magnitude AND helps the project to make CI more
stable.
Yeah right, I
GitHub user corneadoug opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
[ZEPPELIN-1190] [WIP] Visit Notebook Revision
### What is this PR for?
A few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits.
First time? Check out the
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1266
@AhyoungRyu it's better to post CI failure to help getting feedback faster
AND search existing JIRA issues, to see if that is something know or being
addressed elsewhere.
Here is an example
Hello,
The version of the notebook that I provided [0] is the latest one, but yes
-
-> The exception stack trace was because that paragraph was trying to
create a file that was already present at that location/directory, meaning
that paragraph was supposed to be run only once but by mistake I
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1257
@prabhjyotsingh Thank you for your detail review. I fixed all that you
mentioned.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user mwkang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1290
I am not sure it is related with this PR.
When I run it, it passed.
```
Failed tests:
ParallelSchedulerTest.testRun:63 expected: but was:
```
---
If your project is set up
Github user mwkang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1248
I am not sure this error is related with this issue.
```
Failed tests:
ZeppelinSparkClusterTest.zRunTest:204 expected: but was:
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/932
@echarles thank you for taking care!
Please give me some time to try it out and make another pass on it and I'll
get back to you here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Thank you for sharing, Anish!
It looks great, I will spend some time looking though the details of the
notebook later and post back!
>From the quick glance - the notebook that you shared have some error
stack-traces [1], and some paragraph seems not to have an output (were not
executed?) -
Github user kavinkumarks commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
The latest CI build is green
https://travis-ci.org/apache/zeppelin/builds/150722171 and also rebased the
branch with the latest master. @jongyoul could you please merge and close this
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1200
Merge if there's no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1266
It seems the CI failure is irrelevant with this PR. Can someone review this
one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1299
Merge if there is no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1293
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mwkang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1290
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mwkang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1248
re-trigger CI
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user mwkang reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1290
[ZEPPELIN-708]shift positions automatically to the next cell
### What is this PR for?
Add and modify shortcut function
* Shift + Enter: Run paragraph, move focus to next
* Ctrl +
GitHub user mwkang reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1248
[ZEPPELIN-1069]Ignore implicit interpreter when user enter wrong
interpreter name
### What is this PR for?
Ignore implicit interpreter when user enter wrong interpreter name
linked to
Github user mwkang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1248
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1278
@zjffdu Thanks for the contribution!
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1293
Merge into master and branch-0.6 if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user kavinkumarks closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1293
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1281
LGTM! CI is also green.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1200
https://travis-ci.org/apache/zeppelin/builds/150652801
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user jongyoul reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1200
[ZEPPELIN-1191] Supported legacy way to run paragraph with group name only
### What is this PR for?
Preserving legacy way to run paragraph when users use group name only
### What
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1200
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jongyoul reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
[ZEPPELIN-1210] Run interpreter per user
### What is this PR for?
Enabling each user to run same interpreter.
### What type of PR is it?
[Improvement]
### What is the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
https://travis-ci.org/apache/zeppelin/builds/150661771
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1301
https://travis-ci.org/apache/zeppelin/builds/150645554
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1301
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kavinkumarks commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
Reopened to trigger travis build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user kavinkumarks reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
[ZEPPELIN-1268] As an enduser, I would like to embed paragraph and refresh
the content of it in my custom UI
### What is this PR for?
This pull request is to add the below options so
GitHub user jongyoul reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1301
[MINOR] Removed unused profiles from spark/pom.xml
### What is this PR for?
Making spark/pom.xml simple
### What type of PR is it?
[Refactoring]
### Todos
* [x] -
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1301
https://travis-ci.org/apache/zeppelin/builds/150548730
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1301
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user mwkang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1290
I handle that unnecessary persisted in note.json.
I find some problem.
While new paragraph is added in runParagraph, focus is not end of line.
It ignore space character.
Github user agura commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1303
It seems that falied tests are not related with Ignite or Ignite
dependencies. Could somebody take a look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Shim HyungSung created ZEPPELIN-1309:
Summary: Show checkbox for "Connect to existing process" on
interpreter menu.
Key: ZEPPELIN-1309
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1309
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
You can do it by closing and re-opening this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user agura opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1303
ZEPPELIN-1308 Apache Ignite version upgraded up to 1.7
### What is this PR for?
Apache Ignite 1.7 release contains contains many improvements and fixes.
What is important for Ignite
Andrey Gura created ZEPPELIN-1308:
-
Summary: [Ignie interpreter] Upgrade Ignite version up to 1.7
Key: ZEPPELIN-1308
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1308
Project: Zeppelin
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1293
@minahlee done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user mwkang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1248
@jongyoul Sorry, I missed it. I will check. I appreciate your review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1299
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1229
okay I'll make it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1229
@astroshim Can you create a JIRA issue for this, or point me to the
existing one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user corneadoug closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1159
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kavinkumarks commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
@jongyoul I dont see the option to restart the build in travis since I
don't have the write access to repo.And I didn't find any way other than doing
some hacks.Could you please let me know
Hello,
I am pleased to let you know that fourth notebook is ready for review at
[0]. The notebook uses both WARC and WET format of data. Warcbase library
has been extensively used. The notebook contains seven sections ending with
a search engine built using Apache Lucene.
Documentation and blog
Github user doanduyhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
By the way, those issues are all related to the fact that we are running
our software factory on a shared/mutualized infrastructure (Travis). I have the
same issue of random failures due to
Github user doanduyhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
@jongyoul The only way to avoid this failure is to block the unit tests
until the embedded Cassandra server is up, which can take time and sometimes
end in a dead-lock situation.
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
@doanduyhai Thanks for the quick response. I see what happened. Is there
any way to avoid this failure by conservative code?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1281
Sure, let me take a look at it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
@doanduyhai I've found an error that I've never seen it while testing
CassandraInterpreter. Can you check that file :
https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/150544950/log.txt ?
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
@kavinkumarks Your changes LGTM, but could you please trigger the CI again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1281
@prabhjyotsingh I have Selenium test `testGroupPermission` failing on this
PR, but can't find why.
Could you take a look since you made that test?
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1284
Even though the interpreter name is ```spark1``` or ```myintp```, the auto
completion is spark's.
so This way(just spark) is clear i think.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1299
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user kavinkumarks commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
Have updated the title, please let me know if I am missing anything else.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1293
@khalidhuseynov Could you resolve conflicts?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1288
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1301
[MINOR] Removed unused profiles from spark/pom.xml
### What is this PR for?
Making spark/pom.xml simple
### What type of PR is it?
[Refactoring]
### Todos
* [x] -
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1262
Could you please revise the title first?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1247
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
67 matches
Mail list logo
