[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1498: [DOCS] Fix dead link in docs/datasource_authorization....

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1498 CI is failed at `SCALA_VER="2.10" SPARK_VER="1.4.1" HADOOP_VER="2.3"` with ``` No output has been received in the last 10 minutes, this potentially indicates a stalled build or

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1498: [DOCS] Fix dead link in docs/datasource_authorization....

Github user minahlee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1498 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1498: [DOCS] Fix dead link in docs/datasource_authorization....

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1498 @anthonycorbacho @minahlee Thank you for the prompt response! @minahlee Yeah I didn't thought about that. Reverted it :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1498: [DOCS] Fix dead link in docs/datasource_authorization....

Github user anthonycorbacho commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1498 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1498: [DOCS] Fix dead link in docs/datasource_authori...

GitHub user AhyoungRyu opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1498 [DOCS] Fix dead link in docs/datasource_authorization.md ### What is this PR for? A link for `the community interpreters` in

Re: How Apache Zeppelin runs a paragraph

Thanks Jougyoul for the effort. This is really helpful for new contributors. Several comments. 1. Seems we didn't use noteId/notebookId correctly in code, do we have ticket to track that ? Because the sample code is conflicted with the definition of note/notebook in the post, it might confuse

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1496: [Zeppelin-907] Apply new mechanism to AngularInterpret...

Github user vectorijk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1496 @anthonycorbacho Thanks for your quick response. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

Seems like we have a couple of good fixes. +1 for another release On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:53 PM -0700, "Ahyoung Ryu" > wrote: +1 On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Prabhjyot Singh wrote: > +1 > > On 8 Oct 2016

Re: How Apache Zeppelin runs a paragraph

Great post! On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:56 PM -0700, "Jongyoul Lee" > wrote: Hello DuyHai, Thanks for the fixing the typo. I've fixed it. Concerning the debugging, I think writing posts or updating wiki would be better. I'm willing to write a

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1497: [ZEPPELIN-1233] Support Redis interpreter

GitHub user darionyaphet opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1497 [ZEPPELIN-1233] Support Redis interpreter ### What is this PR for? A few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits. First time? Check out the contributing

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1496: [Zeppelin-907] Apply new mechanism to AngularInterpret...

Github user anthonycorbacho commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1496 @vectorijk thank you for the contribution the change look good to me --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

Re: Refactor time !

On 04/10/16 12:54, Anthony Corbacho wrote: You made my day, this is the kind of email i really like !! I think its a great idea and i am willing to spend sometime on it. I also want to move to a DI (guice) architecture , let me know what you think about it. A PR is opened for Guice DI. If

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1487: [ZEPPELIN-1520] Change test environment to use the loc...

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1487 And think again, how about making the local mode as the default mode for local dev (non-travis enviroment), and use standalone mode for travis ? Because local mode success doesn't mean other modes

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

+1 On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Prabhjyot Singh wrote: > +1 > > On 8 Oct 2016 5:42 a.m., "Hyung Sung Shim" wrote: > > > +1 > > > > 2016년 10월 8일 토요일, Victor Manuel Garcia님이 작성한 > 메시지: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > El 7/10/2016