Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1649
CI failed but it doesn't related with this PR
- https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/176613823/log.txt?deansi=true (NPE)
- https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/176613828/log.txt?deansi=true
Hi dear Zeppelin developers,
Does anyone know how to turn on debug info for shiro? I changed the
zeppelin/conf/log4j.properties to DEBUG but does't seem to see the shiro
debug log in the zeppelin.log.
Thanks!
Weipu
Hoon Park created ZEPPELIN-1678:
---
Summary: Improve main page notebook filter style
Key: ZEPPELIN-1678
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1678
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type:
GitHub user khalidhuseynov reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1625
[ZEPPELIN-1657] Private/public mode for user note creation/import
### What is this PR for?
In multi-user environment when users create a notebook normally they would
expect that
Github user khalidhuseynov closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1625
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1648
CI failure due to the selenium test in zeppelin-server not the this change.
```
ests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 157.128 sec
<<< FAILURE! - in
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1176
@xiufengliu
This feature is currently implemented.
I have almost done this change so we can use it as a code implementation of
the paragraph.
If a fast merge is done, I think
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1648
@bzz
Could you review this PR?
This comment is result summary for this PR (how much time we can save)
### 1. APT cache (almost 15 secs per
(before)
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1644
@astroshim Thanks for the improvement. Tested and LGTM.
Merge to master if there're no further comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1638
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1624
@karup1990 sorry, it was pending status. You can now see
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1624#pullrequestreview-8931671
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user karup1990 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1624
@Leemoonsoo I dont see your comments.. (as mentioned in ur last comment).
Not sure If I am missing something
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Praveen Kanamarlapudi created ZEPPELIN-1677:
---
Summary: Livy-interpreter: Enable displayAppInfo option for
livy-pyspark magic.
Key: ZEPPELIN-1677
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1677
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1554
LGTM and merge to master if there're no further comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Praveen Kanamarlapudi created ZEPPELIN-1676:
---
Summary: Livy-interpreter: convert livy scala magic line execution
into block execution
Key: ZEPPELIN-1676
URL:
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1587
I see what you mean. Thanks for the explanation. Make sense.
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1624
@karup1990 Thanks for the great contribution.
Tested and works well. I left a comment. Please take a look!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1625
@khalidhuseynov Can you make CI green?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1588
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Prasad Wagle created ZEPPELIN-1674:
--
Summary: Cannot lock stacked bar graphs in zeppelin, defaults to
grouped with a page refresh
Key: ZEPPELIN-1674
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1674
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1648
Commit: 06c006e, CI Build:
https://travis-ci.org/apache/zeppelin/builds/176457703
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1648
[ZEPPELIN-1673] CI Test should not fail due to maven log
### What is this PR for?
Sometimes build fails due to log size for example,
{code}
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0,
Hoon Park created ZEPPELIN-1673:
---
Summary: Reduce CI log size and make build faster
Key: ZEPPELIN-1673
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1673
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type:
GitHub user Mleekko opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1647
[ZEPPELIN-1013] Don't run paragraph on selectbox change
### What is this PR for?
Enabling to change values of multiple selectboxes witout running the
paragraph
### What type of PR
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1636
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1636
@khalidhuseynov LGTM. Will merge if there are no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1633
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user doanduyhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1485
@ravwojdyla any update on this ? I face the same issue and need your PR to
go into trunk
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user doanduyhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1466
Without feedback I'll push a new PR with suggested code refactor & merge it
in a few weeks @robertdkmarshall,
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1646
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1638
Currently all interpreters in each group shares same dependencies and
options. So if we create 2 interpreters `postgres1` `postgres2` and set a
dependency `postgres94.client.jar`
Hi all,
Is there any plans to include map visualization feature to zeppelin? as it
has been in Hue for awhile? As much our customers enjoy using zeppelin, it
has become obvious map visualization is one feature impacting their
decision on which data analytic tool to chose. Please advise ..
Cheers
Github user anthonycorbacho commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635
@khalidhuseynov as you can see its a wip, i will let you know when its
ready for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user anthonycorbacho commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1646
@khalidhuseynov i am re triggering travis and merging as a hot fix after
that
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1638
Build profiles 2, 3, 4, 8 are nondeterministic :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1638
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1638
[ZEPPELIN-1666] DON'T share mutable deps, options between interpreters in
each group (bug)
### What is this PR for?
Every interpreter shares their `List` and `InterpreterOption`
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1636
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1646
tested locally and solves the issue with import, LGTM! CI failure is
irrelevant with selenium profile flaky test below:
```
Tests in error:
Github user yiming187 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1477
Hi @jongyoul , the doc is updated. Could you help review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user prabhjyotsingh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1554
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1635
@anthonycorbacho thanks for enhancements! i started looking into this one
and first of all CI looks like failing with checkstyle issues. Also some
methods seem to be missing, and proper
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1638
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1638
[ZEPPELIN-1666] DON'T share mutable deps, options between interpreters in
each group (bug)
### What is this PR for?
Every interpreter shares their `List` and `InterpreterOption`
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1625
@Leemoonsoo thanks for review, addressed comments in
fc91b2f15725e91db1cbdf0439e8dd8779fc4f68. also rebased and resolved conflicts
since `docs/install/install.md` was recently changed.
45 matches
Mail list logo
