[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1926: [BUILD] Remove docker build

GitHub user minahlee opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1926 [BUILD] Remove docker build ### What is this PR for? Removing docker build and push from release script. Docker managed by community will be supported sooner or later through

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1924: [Pyspark] checking nhooks count.

Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1924 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1918: Remove multple artifactId - hadoop-common

Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1918 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1909: [ZEPPELIN-1978] Let Zeppelin server start if authoriza...

Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1909 would this allow unauthorized or anonymous access to otherwise secured notebook though? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1912: [HOTFIX][ZEPPELIN-1980] - Test and update CI for matpl...

Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1912 merging if no more comment --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1915: ZEPPELIN-1985 Remove user from pig tutorial note

Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1915 merging if no more comment --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1925: [ZEPPELIN-1749] Fix Flaky test: in Websequence ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1925 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1925: [ZEPPELIN-1749] Fix Flaky test: in Websequence markdow...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1925 CI green. Merge to master as a hotfix. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1993) Install interpreter from Helium menu.

Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-1993: -- Summary: Install interpreter from Helium menu. Key: ZEPPELIN-1993 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1993 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type:

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1925: [ZEPPELIN-1749] Fix Flaky test: in Websequence ...

GitHub user Leemoonsoo reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1925 [ZEPPELIN-1749] Fix Flaky test: in Websequence markdown plugin ### What is this PR for? Fix flaky test n Websequence markdown plugin. Test is failing when request to websequence is

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1925: [ZEPPELIN-1749] Fix Flaky test: in Websequence ...

Github user Leemoonsoo closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1925 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1923: [ZEPPELIN-1857] Fix flaky test: NotebookTest.te...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1923 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1923: [ZEPPELIN-1857] Fix flaky test: NotebookTest.testAbort...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1923 Merge to master as a hotfix. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1896: implementation test case for connect to exists interpr...

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1896 I've missed it. I thought it was flaky tests. Got it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1925: [ZEPPELIN-1749] Fix Flaky test: in Websequence ...

GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1925 [ZEPPELIN-1749] Fix Flaky test: in Websequence markdown plugin ### What is this PR for? Fix flaky test n Websequence markdown plugin. Test is failing when request to websequence is

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1924: [Pyspark] checking nhooks count.

GitHub user astroshim opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1924 [Pyspark] checking nhooks count. ### What is this PR for? if the `nhooks` value is `0` in

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1920: [ZEPPELIN-1455] Fix flaky test: AbstractAngular...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1920 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1920: [ZEPPELIN-1455] Fix flaky test: AbstractAngularElemTes...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1920 Merge it as a hot fix --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1920: [ZEPPELIN-1455] Fix flaky test: AbstractAngular...

GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1920 [ZEPPELIN-1455] Fix flaky test: AbstractAngularElemTest ### What is this PR for? This PR fix flaky test [ZEPPELIN-1455](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1455).

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1992) Flaky test - startUpWithAuthenticationEnable()

Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-1992: -- Summary: Flaky test - startUpWithAuthenticationEnable() Key: ZEPPELIN-1992 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1992 Project: Zeppelin

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1919: Increase WelcomePageSuite timeout

GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1919 Increase WelcomePageSuite timeout ### What is this PR for? Try fix problem described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1986. Almost all recent build has this failure

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1990) Zeppelin holding cluster resources

Srikanth Daggumalli created ZEPPELIN-1990: - Summary: Zeppelin holding cluster resources Key: ZEPPELIN-1990 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1990 Project: Zeppelin

Jekyll Migration Help

Hey all, On Apache Mahout project we're still on the old content management system. We'd like to migrate over to Jekyll- was wondering if anyone has any expertise in that and could help out. Feel free to reply on dev@mahout Thanks in advance! tg Trevor Grant Data Scientist

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1864: [ZEPPELIN-1921] missing close in closeAndRemove...

GitHub user cloverhearts reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1864 [ZEPPELIN-1921] missing close in closeAndRemoveInterpreterGroup method ### What is this PR for? The problem is that some code in the closeAndRemoveInterpreterGroup method of

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1582: [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Network visu...

Github user conker84 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1582 The bug is in: `org.apache.zeppelin.helium.HeliumVisualizationFactory.installNodeAndNpm(HeliumVisualizationFactory.java:80)` and is not related to the PR --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1582: [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Network visu...

Github user conker84 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1582 @felixcheung after the last rebase i can't get Zeppelin running, ```bash WARN [2017-01-20 15:24:13,141] ({org.apache.zeppelin.server.ZeppelinServer.main()}

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1916: [WIP] [ZEPPELIN-1986] WelcomePageSuite test fail

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1916 I see. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1916: [WIP] [ZEPPELIN-1986] WelcomePageSuite test fail

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1916 @jongyoul just wanted make sure the failure is coming from `WelcomePageSuite` it self, not as a side effect of other problems. I'll close this PR and open another PR once i found fix.

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1918: Remove multple artifactId - hadoop-common

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1918 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1918: Remove multple artifactId - hadoop-common

GitHub user prabhjyotsingh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1918 Remove multple artifactId - hadoop-common ### What is this PR for? Remove multple artifactId - hadoop-common in JDBC ### What type of PR is it? [Refactor | Minor]

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1989) Remove multple artifactId - hadoop-common in JDBC

Prabhjyot Singh created ZEPPELIN-1989: - Summary: Remove multple artifactId - hadoop-common in JDBC Key: ZEPPELIN-1989 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1989 Project: Zeppelin

Re: [Discuss] Move some interpreters out of zeppelin project

Thanks Jeff for staring the thread. Here's my thoughts 1. Do we need to do this yes. 2. If the answer is yes, which interpreters should be moved out If Zeppelin community has no problem maintaining certain interpreter, then no reason to remove contribution from community. However, if Zeppelin

Re: R interpreter

For avoiding it, you can make interpreter-setting.json file in a spark directory which includes all of spark and r settings. I think it's realistic solution for now. On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Igor Drozdov wrote: > After I build zeppelin with R profile I got

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1896: implementation test case for connect to exists interpr...

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1896 LGTM. will merge it --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1916: [WIP] [ZEPPELIN-1986] WelcomePageSuite test fail

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1916 Is it ok to remove it? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1914: [ZEPPELIN-1983] Feedback about success/failure when in...

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1914 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1917: [ZEPPELIN-1988] precode execution in JDBCInterp...

GitHub user dwhsys opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1917 [ZEPPELIN-1988] precode execution in JDBCInterpreter ### What is this PR for? PR adds new parameter in JDBC interpreter which allows to execute some SQL while opening connection. Parameter

Re: [Discuss] Move some interpreters out of zeppelin project

Hi Jeff, Thanks for starting this issue. It increases flexibility of improving interpreters itself but it can also decreases stability of interpreters. I'm worried about this side-effect. As you mentioned, it's hard for me to review new interpreter that I didn't use but it couldn't be a reason

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1886: [ZEPPELIN-1876] improved comptetion with schema/table/...

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1886 There is a flaky test in the result: ``` WelcomePageSuite ``` Never mind the result. that test is being fixed now. LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1864: [ZEPPELIN-1921] missing close in closeAndRemove...

Github user cloverhearts closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1864 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1864: [ZEPPELIN-1921] missing close in closeAndRemove...

GitHub user cloverhearts reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1864 [ZEPPELIN-1921] missing close in closeAndRemoveInterpreterGroup method ### What is this PR for? The problem is that some code in the closeAndRemoveInterpreterGroup method of

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1988) precode execution in JDBCInterpreter

Sergey Sotnichenko created ZEPPELIN-1988: Summary: precode execution in JDBCInterpreter Key: ZEPPELIN-1988 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1988 Project: Zeppelin

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1987) useing sparksql to query the data on HDFS

qinchaofeng created ZEPPELIN-1987: - Summary: useing sparksql to query the data on HDFS Key: ZEPPELIN-1987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1987 Project: Zeppelin Issue

[Discuss] Move some interpreters out of zeppelin project

As we talk in another thread [1] about moving some interpreters out of zeppelin project. I open this thread to discuss it in more details. I'd like to raise 4 questions for this. 1. Do we need to do this 2. If the answer is yes, which interpreters should be moved out 3. How do we integrate these

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1916: [WIP] [ZEPPELIN-1986] WelcomePageSuite test fai...

GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1916 [WIP] [ZEPPELIN-1986] WelcomePageSuite test fail ### What is this PR for? Try fix problem described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1986. Almost all recent build has

Re: Unstable travis CI recently

I can change some fields and types but cannot convert all tickets to sub-task. I'll change them manually. On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > Hi Jongyoul, > > Could you move all these tickets under this umbrella ticket ? > > You can do bulk change by clicking

RE: R interpreter

After I build zeppelin with R profile I got zeppelin-zrinterpreter binary in interpreters/spark folder -Original Message- From: Jeff Zhang [mailto:zjf...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 4:51 PM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Re: R interpreter That is SparkR, R

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1986) WelcomePageSuite test fail

Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-1986: -- Summary: WelcomePageSuite test fail Key: ZEPPELIN-1986 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1986 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type: Bug