Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2518
Thanks @SachinJanani for the fix!
Merge to master and branch-0.7 if no further comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2502
@sanjaydasgupta Thanks for addressing newline issue.
If we take a look dynamic form, each interpreter can choose whether
interpreter wants to use Dynamic form or not by overriding [Inte
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2495
Merge to master if no further comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2532
Thanks for @imnotkind addressing BOM. Tested and LGTM.
CI failure is not related to this change.
Merge to master if no further comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2526
ok, sorry for dragging it on... then I'll flip the question, are Writers
also Runners then?
In the case someone is upgrading from the current version of Zeppelin with
an existing notebook
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2373
Hi! Please redirect your questions to dev@zeppelin.apache.org or open a
JIRA if there is a bug?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Umair Saleem created ZEPPELIN-2870:
--
Summary: Could Not Start Zeppelin
Key: ZEPPELIN-2870
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2870
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Bug
Affec
Shafique Jamal created ZEPPELIN-2869:
Summary: .take(1) method on Dataset[String] fails due to inability
to deserialize (NoSuchMethodError)
Key: ZEPPELIN-2869
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELI
Github user ss77892 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2520
@felixcheung As I mentioned in the JIRA the default jdbc driver that is
used in tests has different behavior ( allows to make call next() even if the
result set is already at the end). Not sure ho
Github user gfalcone commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2526
@felixcheung nothing would change for them because readers cannot run the
notebook. The only rights allowed to run a notebook are writers and owners
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2536
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2526
I see. In the case someone is upgrading from the current version of
Zeppelin with an existing notebook with Readers role set, would they run into
trouble that those users can no longer run the
Github user tae-jun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2543
LGTM! ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Hi,
0.7.3 is a maintenance release, so in terms of new feature, I prefer to
ship it in 0.8.0, so we can keep 0.7.3 as a stable release.
We have a discussion thread for release 0.8.0 [1]. And I think we can
discuss there, more about 0.8.0 release which includes all the new
functionalities.
Does i
Hi, Moon!
Is there any possibility to include in 0.7.3 some critical functionality (for
Tinkoff) out of security scope? It will help us to upgrade our platform in more
stable mode. Now we are forced to use unstable version built from development
snapshot in production.
On 2017-08-16 18
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2541
LGTM. Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sanjaydasgupta commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2502
Thanks for the catch # @Leemoonsoo
I have fixed and committed the issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user imnotkind commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2532
oh i didn't realize there were certain issues with excel. i included BOM,
and i added revokeObjectURL (decrementing reference count) to enable garbage
collecting. now unicode works fine!
---
I
Github user sanjaydasgupta closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2502
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
GitHub user sanjaydasgupta reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2502
[ZEPPELIN-2807] Passing Z variables to SQL Interpreter (One part of
ZEPPELIN-1967)
### What is this PR for?
This feature allows embedding/interpolating Z variables into SQL stat
20 matches
Mail list logo