Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3074
Got it. I hope not to spend much time merging this feature into the master
branch after finishing implementations.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Jeff Zhang
wrote:
> @j
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3074
@jongyoul This is for the zeppelin HA feature which will involve many PRs.
Here's the pros and cons of creating new branch.
Pros.
1. Move fast of implementing this feature
2. Keep the ma
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3077
Can you rebase your PRs from the latest master branch? We have fixed CI and
you might get green.
---
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3001
Sorry for the late reply. As you mentioned, Zeppelin already has two or
more json dependencies at the same time, but I don't think it's good and we can
fix it when we can do and have a chance. Ho
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3074
BTW, it looks hard to maintain a new branch for a new feature. we already
use github's PR and we can test it by pulling PR with dev/test_pr
WDYT?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3074
It make sense @liuxunorg , I will create a new branch for this feature.
---
Github user liuxunorg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3074
@Tagar @jongyoul @zjffdu If the community feels that zeppelin has been
added to the clustering feature, the changes are relatively large. Is it
possible to add a new code branch?
This can b
Github user liuxunorg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3074
hi @Tagar , Increasing the service state consistency of the system through
zookeeper is a common practice in distributed systems. But this will cause
zeppelin to rely on an external service zook
Github user Tagar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3074
Just out of curiosity, why Raft Protocol? Have you considered alternatives,
for example, Zookeeper could do here, I guess. I think what the design document
is missing is some sort of pros and cons c
Thanks Jongyoul
Jongyoul Lee 于2018年7月23日周一 下午1:26写道：
> Hi,
>
> I've reverted ZEPPELIN-3593 as it doesn't look stable for the production
> environment. I'll create a new PR after adding an option setting to enable
> it. It will be disabled by default.
>
> Regards,
> JL
>
> --
> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee,
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3088
---
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3088
Will close and make several PR to replace them
---
Hi,
I've reverted ZEPPELIN-3593 as it doesn't look stable for the production
environment. I'll create a new PR after adding an option setting to enable
it. It will be disabled by default.
Regards,
JL
--
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3088
@zjffdu https://travis-ci.org/jongyoul/zeppelin/builds/406977293 Jenkins
seems to become bad
---
GitHub user jongyoul reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3088
[HOTFIX] Disable some flaky tests
### What is this PR for?
Some tests become failed due to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3593 BTW, it looks like a timing
issue. I saw som
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3088
---
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3088
[HOTFIX] Disable some flaky tests
### What is this PR for?
Some tests become failed due to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3593 BTW, it looks like a timing
issue. I saw some
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3087
@padmacs Can you describe more details about this PR ? What features does
this PR provide ? Screenshot will be helpful.
---
Jongyoul Lee created ZEPPELIN-3650:
--
Summary: Fix this bug that show output twice "sometimes" after
refreshing browser
Key: ZEPPELIN-3650
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3650
Proj
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3035
I plan to have 0.8.1 release for critical bug fixes. So please merge to
branch-0.8 as well
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3035
we don't have a 0.9 branch or plan yet. should we backport to 0.8? are we
having another release, like 0.8.1?
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3035
I don't this is ported to 0.8
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/commits/branch-0.8
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3066
can you comment on my comment:
`this doesn't seem quite right, we are ignoring all IOException from
running the paragraph?`?
---
liuxun created ZEPPELIN-3649:
Summary: When multiple people edit the same note, there is no
prompt message.
Key: ZEPPELIN-3649
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3649
Project: Zeppelin
Jongyoul Lee created ZEPPELIN-3648:
--
Summary: Implement new methods related to handling ZeppelinContext
via paragraph
Key: ZEPPELIN-3648
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3648
Proje
Jongyoul Lee created ZEPPELIN-3647:
--
Summary: Implement InterpreterModeActionsIT again not to use
IntegrationTest
Key: ZEPPELIN-3647
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3647
Project:
26 matches
Mail list logo
