Github user monsieurp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3239
Yes it is! :)
---
Thanks @Jongyoul Lee , let's clean the interface
first.
Jongyoul Lee 于2018年12月14日周五 下午1:51写道：
> Thanks, Jeff and Felix,
>
> I simply thought it would be better to construct a more clear view for
> devs. But, as you mentioned, it could scatter our concentrations. Let's try
> to do efforts to
Thanks, Jeff and Felix,
I simply thought it would be better to construct a more clear view for
devs. But, as you mentioned, it could scatter our concentrations. Let's try
to do efforts to clean up our code and test scenarios inside one repository.
Thank you guys.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:03
Yes, right.
That's because Infra suggests that we leave a mail thread to make a
consensus about it.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:14 PM Felix Cheung
wrote:
> Hi Jongyoul - is this the same as the earlier thread?
>
>
>
> From: Jongyoul Lee
> Sent: Tuesday,
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3262
Thank you so much for your first contribution. :-) Will merge it
---
Github user fred521 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3262
My email daizhi...@gmail.com
Actually I have done a lot of fixes this year.
Trying to merge back now.
Thanks again
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 21:29
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3262
@fred521 BTW, Could you please tell me your jira id or email address? I
need to register you as a contributor
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3262
---
Github user fred521 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3262
Cool @jongyoul thanks, done with that
please let me know if anything else I will need to follow
> @fred521 Thanks. The last thing. Can you update your title including
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3262
@fred521 Thanks. The last thing. Can you update your title including
'[ZEPPELIN-3902]'?
---
Github user fred521 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3262
> @fred521 I've found one of your tests failed.
https://travis-ci.org/fred521/zeppelin/builds/467287988 Could you please check
it again?
Thanks
seems randomly failed for the network
Github user fred521 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3254
UI-Grid actually creates a lot of performance issue, why not deprecate it
but still introducing new feature?
In my service, I completely wiped out UI-Grid
---
Hi Jongyoul - is this the same as the earlier thread?
From: Jongyoul Lee
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 6:28 PM
To: dev
Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox
Hi, devs,
I'd like to make a consensus to move our repository from git-wip to gitbox.
Please give
Agree with Felix, this is what I also concern in my last email. @Jongyoul
Lee Could you explain more about how separate repo
help here ? Thanks
Felix Cheung 于2018年12月14日周五 上午11:00写道：
> In my opinion, definitely a clean interface will be very useful and having
> a better way to test is good.
In my opinion, definitely a clean interface will be very useful and having a
better way to test is good.
But sounds to me like these should be possible without a code repo separation?
The downside of separate repo (I assume still under ASF) is the spreading the
attention of committers and
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3262
@fred521 I've found one of your tests failed.
https://travis-ci.org/fred521/zeppelin/builds/467287988 Could you please check
it again?
---
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3239
@monsieurp Is `Patrice Clement` your jira account ? I'd like to assign this
ticket to you.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3239
---
Github user monsieurp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3239
@zffdu: Sorry for not responding earlier. IMHO, deleting `common.max_count`
should be dealt with in a separate PR / bug report since it is completely
unrelated to the feature here. Until then,
Github user fred521 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3262
Hi @jongyoul
can you help to merge it? the CI passed
Thanks
---
Github user fred521 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3262
Thanks @felixcheung I have updated it
---
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3199
---
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3263
ZEPPELIN-3907. Add code statement into Spark JobGroup Id for
SparkInterpreter
### What is this PR for?
Straightforward change to add code statement into Spark JobGroupId, so that
we can
23 matches
Mail list logo
