Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2309
I'll merge it if there's no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
age 1]
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Raffaele S wrote:
>
>> I believe it's a good idea to select which interpreters to keep in the
>> "default release", should we track this through JIRA?
>>
>> 2017-06-11 17:05 GMT+02:00 Jongyoul Lee :
>
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2418
[ZEPPELIN-2645] Adding way to register RemoteInterpreterServer's port into
InterpreterProcess
### What is this PR for?
This is a thrift version related to #2410
###
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
Merging if there's no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
GitHub user jongyoul reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
[ZEPPELIN-2590] Convert jupyter's notebook to Zeppelin's note
### What is this PR for?
Converting jupyter's notebook to Zeppelin's note
### What type of PR
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2398
Merging if there's no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2410
[ZEPPELIN-2645] Adding way to register RemoteInterpreterServer's port into
InterpreterProcess
### What is this PR for?
Changing the way to register interpreter to server. interpreter
Jongyoul Lee created ZEPPELIN-2645:
--
Summary: Adding way to register RemoteInterpreterServer's port
into InterpreterProcess
Key: ZEPPELIN-2645
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2329
@zjffdu I agree with you. It's very basic and minimum feature to run
interpreters in Zeppelin. I'll take that issue ASAP.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2309
@1ambda Thanks. @tinkoff-dwh Please catch up the comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2404
Let me test it. I wonder if it works when we restart Zeppelin itself or not.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2404
@wary Thanks for additional description. Let's check it. It's very fragile
part of Apache Zeppelin for now. Did you test other behaviors related this
features?
---
If your project
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2404
Hi, It's intended behaviours. If you want to restart your interpreter only,
you can click the restart button on the note page.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
> https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/
> examples/spark#known-issues-with-zeppelin
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, 06:54 Jongyoul Lee wrote:
>
> > Felix,
> > Yes, I said a bit confused. I want to release Zeppelin with some -
> not-all
> > - interpre
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
Passed. https://travis-ci.org/jongyoul/zeppelin/builds/241524191
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2403
Thanks. Merge it if there's no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2402
Thanks for contribution. I suggest you'd better divide this PR into three
or more different PRs as you mentioned in description. This PR includes many
changes. I hope every PR changes as
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2282
Let me check
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2403
@karuppayya Can you re-trigger the last profile of CI?
https://travis-ci.org/karuppayya/zeppelin/builds/241501388
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2398
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
epos/dist/release/zeppelin/KEYS
> >
> > Release notes available at
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> version=12340231&projectId=12316221
> >
> > Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 01:00 12/Jun PDT).
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] 0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
>
--
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
@cloverhearts Can you tested it? I've pushed some commit and deployed it to
snapshots. And also please test it with v3 format :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2206
Can you fix it to fit with current master as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2125
@conker84 I found it's your first contribution. Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2125
@felixcheung Yes, I already checked it but I was confused the branch name
is master. :-) Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2125
Can you make CI green?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2125
Thanks, Will merge it after CI become green
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2397
@andreaTP Thanks for fixing it. BTW, I think we'd better use
try-with-resources of outputStream
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2397
@andreaTP try() doesn't call close when it occurs exception?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2397
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2125
Oh, I'm sorry for the late reply. I think you'd better to move those
classes into another PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2383
Thanks, I just wonder if it works becase it was developed when spark was
1.5. One more question. Did you test -sparkR ? If you did, can you compare
which one is proper for you? We had two
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2383
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2250
I'm a bit confused because there's some unrelated changes regarding this
issue. I don't know why you change zeppelin-interpreter package and why you
make hash code and equals
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2368
Thanks. Will merge it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2390
@qwemicheal Thanks for the contribution. Can you handle the issues @zjffdu
mentioned?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2395
[ZEPPELIN-2515] After 100 minutes R process quits silently and spark.r
interpreter becomes unresponsive.
### What is this PR for?
Enabling to set timeout value for R backend
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2206
@AlexanderShoshin Can you rebase it from current master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
@felixcheung Thanks for the review. I'll fix somethings and will remain
others for the community. I think there's Python expert in the community and
they will help to improve th
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2368
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2250
I think we'd better take care of the comments left.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jongyoul reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
[ZEPPELIN-2590] Convert jupyter's notebook to Zeppelin's note
### What is this PR for?
Converting jupyter's notebook to Zeppelin's note
### What type of PR
>
> > > > > Since 0.7.1 has major problems like ZEPPELIN-2336 [2], i'd like to
> > > > proceed
> > > > > release process for 0.7.2 at this point and provide stable release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Remaining issue can be resolved in 0.8.0 release (or 0.7.3 if
> another
> > > > > maintenance release is necessary).
> > > > >
> > > > > Shell we proceed to 0.7.2?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > moon
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2276
> > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2336
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net
I saw another mailing thread now. Ignore it.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Jongyoul Lee wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have umbrella issue for 0.7.2. See https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2276
>
> I think it's almost done and there're some trivial is
rpreters) package but didn't conclude the criteria and how we make a
>> decision.
>>
>> Jongyoul, do you have any idea about criteria?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> moon
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:47 AM Felix Cheung
>> wrote:
&g
0.
Regards,
JL
--
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1970
@zjffdu Can you handle this issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jongyoul reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
[ZEPPELIN-2590] Convert jupyter's notebook to Zeppelin's note
### What is this PR for?
Converting jupyter's notebook to Zeppelin's note
### What type of PR
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
Made [ZEPPELIN-2616](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2616)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Jongyoul Lee created ZEPPELIN-2616:
--
Summary: Add docs to describe how to use this feature
Key: ZEPPELIN-2616
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2616
Project: Zeppelin
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
Yes, sure. I'll made another PR for adding docs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2388
Can you close it by yourself?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2282
ping.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2309
LGTM. @1ambda Can you verify it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2369
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2388
I'll merge it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
Ready to review. Please make sure it works with latest jupyter format with
major version of 4
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Felix Cheung
wrote:
> Are we proposing some interpreters to be built and released separately?
>
> Is this going to be separate packaging? Or separate release pipeline?
>
>
> _
> From: Jongyoul Lee mailto:jongy...@gmail.com&g
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2343
LGTM. Will merge it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2393
[WIP][ZEPPELIN-2590] Convert jupyter's notebook to Zeppelin's note
### What is this PR for?
Converting jupyter's notebook to Zeppelin's note
### What type of PR
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2383
I have general question. Does -Pr works at the latest spark distribution?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2384
After merging this PR, let's proceed to release 0.7.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
s the most
important factor. If someone wants to have an idea to deal with it, please
feel free to talk about it.
Thanks,
Jongyoul Lee
--
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2182
Will close it as resolved by #932
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2182
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/932
Tested and LGTM. Sorry for the late reply. I'll merge it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Jongyoul Lee created ZEPPELIN-2590:
--
Summary: Convert jupyter file format to zeppelin's note format
Key: ZEPPELIN-2590
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2590
Project: Zep
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2368
Generally, it makes sense to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
t; org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.doStart(ContainerLifeCycle.java:114)
> at
>
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.AbstractHandler.doStart(AbstractHandler.java:61)
> at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:354)
> at
>
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:68)
> at
> org.apache.zeppelin.server.ZeppelinServer.main(ZeppelinServer.java:195)
>
--
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net
le when the jdbc interpreter is
> > implemented. if user create interpreter setting for each database, then
> he
> > doesn't need to specify `(mysql)` as point 1.
> >
> > Welcome any comments and thoughts on this.
> >
>
--
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2125
@conker84 Hi, I have a question. I'm not sure but classes under
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.graph is used only for testing it. Can you
verify it? If it does, can you move these classes
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2351
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/932
@sohaibiftikhar Sure, I didn't test it yet as I had a talk in ApacheCon
last Wednesday. I'll handle it soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/932
@sohaibiftikhar Thanks for verifying it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
raphs.
>
> Can anyone advise me on the best way to get hold of that Context please?
>
--
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net
cluster and succeed to
> launches
> SparkInterpreter with local mode in yarn cluster.
> Do you mean you can run spark intepreter in yarn cluster mode with
> SPARK_HOME set ?
>
> IIUC, running spark interpreter in yarn-client or yarn-cluster mode require
> SPARK_HOME and HADOOP_CONF_DIR
ages.
> >>> However, keeping code base for remote=false and remote=true introduces
> >>> more
> >>> work.
> >>>
> >>> What do you think?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> moon
> >>>
> >>> On
Hi dev,
Recently, Ci has failed because some profiles changed. It's necessary to
enable it but now some tests fails. Then, we revert it first, fix that
problem and merge it later.
Regards,
Jongyoul Lee
--
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2300
Thanks for your opinion. Then I'll revert it. Please reopen this PR and
rebase it from current master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2300
@AlexanderShoshin After merging this PR, we continued to got failed in CI.
Can you handle it urgently? If it took some times, it would be better to revert
this commit and merge it after fixing
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2329
@Tagar Thanks for reaching it out. In case of Spark, I feel like we need to
focus on external spark mode more. In case of `spark-defaults.conf`, AFAIK,
because we don't need to deploy spa
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2329
@zjffdu Personally, I agree on your opinion. Before I start to do it, I
discussed a lot how to support yarn-cluster mode including spark. I concluded
it's not much weird to launch spark
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1446
I didn't dig into it but have simple question. Does it support embedded
mode?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2329
@zjffdu I'm adding to read HADOOP_CONF_DIR. Concerning spark, I recommend,
for now, to set local[*], and yarn-client. In case of yarn-cluster, I think
native approach would be better. I&#x
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2329
And what I meant ux is about supporting spark's native yarn-cluster mode in
Zeppelin :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2329
I mean 'not in case of spark'. And this implementation satisfies your
needs. You can launches some interpreters like md in local mode and some
interpreters in yarn.
---
If your proj
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2336
This is minor issue and CI failure isn't related to this issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2336
[MINOR] Change `case` indent
### What is this PR for?
Changing style in case of 'case'. Zeppelin has two spaces as default
indentation but checkstyle has different styl
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2329
It makes our logic much difficult, but it's improve users' experiences.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2329
In case of Spark, it has two yarn apps. I agree that it's a bit weird for
users. Otherwise, all other interpreters like python get better to launch it in
yarn cluster. I think it would be b
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2329
@zjffdu Thanks for quick review. I know spark already have yarn-cluster by
itself. In case of Zeppelin, SparkInterpreter will run yarn-client mode which
means driver is still in a process
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2333
I don't think it's good idea to include some interpreters as dependencies
onto zeppelin-zengine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2329
[WIP][PoC] ZEPPELIN-2040 ClusterManager to support launching interpreter in
a cluster
### What is this PR for?
Launching interpreters into yarn cluster. This is PoC level now and has
many
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/932
Actually, I'm not sure I didn't dig into it. My current assumption is to
support anonymous and authorized one
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Thanks for testing it.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote:
> yarn-client mode doesn't work for embeded spark. But does it work before ?
> I think embeded spark should only work with local mode
>
>
>
>
> Jongyoul Lee 于2017年5月9日周二 上午10:02写道：
>
> > Hi
ode in current
master. Can anyone test it and let me know the result?
Thanks in advance,
Jongyoul
--
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/932
I also had a similar problem. We need to handle it.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Sohaib Iftikhar
wrote:
> @echarles <https://github.com/echarles> I tested
601 - 700 of 1657 matches
Mail list logo
