Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
Looks great to me.
Merging to master, if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
So where are we on this? Can this be merged now? :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
I agree we could be more specific on the title/subject for this document.
But lots of company run production on Docker though, just FYI. Either
Docker by itself on premise or in the cl
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
Thanks @astroshim, I have no other concerns.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
I can update PR title
but This PR is one of the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1198 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1278 is already merged.
and If
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
It would be better to change the title to reflect the docker. I think we
should mention docker is only for small experimental enviroment rather than
production environment. Besides that, I don't
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
@zjffdu You're right, usually users don't make their production using
docker.
but We have been received many question about running Zeppelin on their
production environments so I think this
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
The jira title seems a little confusing to me. The PR is for running spark
on yarn by docker, but I don't think users will use docker for production.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
Please merge this if there is no more discussion because I want to make
document for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1279.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
@zjffdu I just tested and got success with removing the yarn profile.
I will close the https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1335 then.
Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
@astroshim I can use spark 2.0 and hadoop 2.7 successfully. I hit this
issue when building zeppelin with profile yarn enabled. So please don't enable
yarn profile otherwise you will get hadoop vers
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
I got success zeppelin job with `spark2.0&hadoop2.7` after apply
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1335.
- hadoop libraries.
```
~/zeppelin$ ls -al ./spark/target/lib/hadoo
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
@felixcheung Yes 2.2, Maybe it's because my maven repo has different
versions of hadoop libraries like following.
```
~/zeppelin$ ls -al ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
Looks like some of the Hadoop jars are 2.2 instead of 2.7?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
I got a following error when I try to run zeppelin with spark2.0&hadoop2.7.
```
ERROR [2016-08-16 16:43:33,121] ({pool-1-thread-3}
Utils.java[invokeMethod]:40) -
java.lang.reflect.Inv
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
Spark2.0 & hadoop2.7 is working well.
- YARN
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3348133/17622873/fc1b827c-60d7-11e6-80ec-e8e9890a5c99.png)
- hdfs
![image](
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
Then what about supporting latest verison(Spark2.0 & hadoop2.7)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
Docs looks great to me, thank you @astroshim !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
cool. hadoop versions in distributions:
CDH: 2.6.0
HDP/Azure: 2.7.1
EMR: 2.7.2
GCP Dataproc: 2.7.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
Spark2.0 & hadoop2.3 is working well.
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3348133/17588549/d611d7ca-600a-11e6-87f6-4a692fbae273.png)
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
Do you know what version of spark&hadoop is popular? I will test it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
It's hard to say - I think one approach would be latest (spark 2.0 & Hadoop
2.7); another approach would be the most popular ones
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
@felixcheung Thank you very much for detail review.:+
I'll fix them but I wonder if what spark and hadoop version should be
supported in this document.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
@AhyoungRyu I'll update. Thank you for giving me the informations.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
@astroshim Great work indeed! As just proof of reading
`spark_cluster_mode.md`, I updated a few minor things in
[here](https://github.com/astroshim/zeppelin/pull/9). Could you check this one
p
25 matches
Mail list logo