[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2107: [ZEPPELIN-2149] Each interpreter should have a seperat...

2017-03-14 Thread prabhjyotsingh
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2107 Merging this if no more discussion. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2107: [ZEPPELIN-2149] Each interpreter should have a seperat...

2017-03-14 Thread prabhjyotsingh
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2107 Any thoughts on this ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2107: [ZEPPELIN-2149] Each interpreter should have a seperat...

2017-03-09 Thread prabhjyotsingh
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2107 I picked up "Interpreter Name" from UI while creating new interpreter, let me rename this to InterpreterGroup. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2107: [ZEPPELIN-2149] Each interpreter should have a seperat...

2017-03-09 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2107 Is `name` the right name for this? I seem to recall we call it something else in the code for the `%thing` --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2107: [ZEPPELIN-2149] Each interpreter should have a seperat...

2017-03-08 Thread r-kamath
Github user r-kamath commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2107 Tested. LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or