[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-24 Thread prabhjyotsingh
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 Will merge this to master (only) if no more discussion. ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-23 Thread Tagar
Github user Tagar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 When I build Zeppelin, I see in maven build log > [INFO] Including org.apache.thrift:libthrift:jar:0.9.3 in the shaded jar. > [INFO] Including org.apache.thrift:libfb303:jar:0.9.3 in

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-23 Thread prabhjyotsingh
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 @Tagar @felixcheung not sure if I fully understand maven-shade-plugin is this https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975/commits/19b21b1624da552ea8168fe07919134e1a7bcb2f what we are

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-22 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 hmmm - agreed maybe shade is the way to go ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-22 Thread Tagar
Github user Tagar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 thanks @prabhjyotsingh bumping up 0.9.3 seems a good idea to me, but I'd like somebody else to review this too. my 2 cents - It might be also good to shade Thrift to avoid future conflicts

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-22 Thread prabhjyotsingh
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 Have pushed a commit with regenerating those files with Thrift Version 0.9.3 hope

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-22 Thread Tagar
Github user Tagar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 @prabhjyotsingh yes, seems that way. It might be more specific for Cloudera or more generic. I know that Cloudera packages CDH with a specific version of Thrift. It used to be 0.9.2 in

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-22 Thread prabhjyotsingh
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 @Tagar is this because of Zeppelin's thrift@0.9.2 and Spark/Hive's thrift@0.93? Should I also regenerate all the thrift files as well? ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-22 Thread Tagar
Github user Tagar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 @felixcheung as an example, I've seen NoSuchMethodError exceptions like one below when working with Spark interpreter reading Hive tables and Thrift version had a version mismatch .. so it may not

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-22 Thread prabhjyotsingh
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 @felixcheung yes, it only affects internal uses. Thanks for the review will merge this if no more discussion. ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-21 Thread r-kamath
Github user r-kamath commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 LGTM ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-21 Thread Tagar
Github user Tagar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 checked a few newer CDH 5 versions and they're packaged with 0.9.3. older CDH 5 version come with 0.9.2. CDH 6 will be shipped with 0.9.3 too. my two cents: +1 from me. thanks.

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2975: ZEPPELIN-3475: Bump up version of Apache Thrift

2018-05-21 Thread prabhjyotsingh
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2975 @zjffdu , @r-kamath , @felixcheung can you help review this. The variability doesn't apply to this, but this is for future accidental usage. ---