GitHub user doanduyhai reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1369
[ZEPPELIN-1376]
### What is this PR for?
When using Zeppelin behind corporate firewall, sometimes the dependencies
download just fails silently. This PR has 2 objectives:
* add
GitHub user doanduyhai reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/746
[ZEPPELIN-699] Add new synchronous paragraph run REST API
### What is this PR for?
Right now, when calling the REST API
`http://:/api/notebook/job//` Zeppelin always
returns **OK** as
Github user doanduyhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1376
@bzz
I don't know why the tests fail on this error message, because this is
indeed **a test which expects a failure** because `system.complex_table` does
not exist, see below:
Github user bustios commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1378
Sure @bzz, it can be optional. I just thought it was more appropriate,
since a dataframe index is always printed, but I can add a parameter like
`show_index=False` to make it optional.
---
If
GitHub user rajarajan-g reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1367
[ZEPPELIN-1040] Show the time when the result is updated
### What is this PR for?
As per existing usage, the time shown in end of each paragraph is the time
the paragraph is updated
Github user rajarajan-g closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1367
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1377
LGTM.
CI is green as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1378
@bustios thank you for improvements!
Could you please explain a bit the benefits of having print index behaviour
enabled by default? Do you think it should not be optional?
It's
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1358
Looks great to me!
Merging to master if there is no further discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user bustios opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1378
[ZEPPELIN-1358] Add support to display Pandas DataFrame index using z.show()
### What is this PR for?
Add support to display Pandas DataFrame index using z.show() in python
interpreter
- run
paragraph 20160828-003254_783795023 using md
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.LazyOpenInterpreter@22778f7f
00:32:54,195 INFO
org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreterManagedProcess:116 -
Run interpreter process [..//bin/interpreter.sh, -d, ../interpreter/md, -p,
46521, -l
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1333
@zjffdu Looks great to me, modulo minor style issue above, thank you and
:+1: for tests!
One more thing - it's a bit strange ZEPPELIN-1334 has fix-for version ONLY
0.6.2 which implies
Github user Peilin-Yang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1363
@bzz I agree
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1363
Let's merge #1371 first, and then it makes perfect sense to adjust this one
to match user expectations of sorting changes according to column type (so it
lets user override auto-detection).
Github user echarles commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1371
Upon numeric values, the automatic detection of dates... would be great.
Detection at client (javascript) side could be misleading as you only get a
subset of the data.
On the
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1371
Thank you @Peilin-Yang !
It looks like it's `O(N)` from the table size - do you think there might be
a performance implication here? Just curious, but if it's a table - should not
analysing
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1376
@lresende maybe ZEPPELIN-1187 is useful for you. You can edit
log4j.properties to add the followign line. This is helpful for me to debug the
remote interpreter process.
```
Github user Peilin-Yang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1371
@arunsoman Yes. in this PR the code can automatically detect the type of
the cells, but restricted to strings and numbers. Dates can be added either and
this is a good idea.
In my other
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1358
@astroshim I rebuild with `mvn clean package -DskipTests -Pexamples` and it
works. I should've attached `-Pexamples`. Now I can see the Helium icon :)
Anyway I checked
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1351
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1377
ZEPPELIN-1384. Spark interpreter binary compatibility to scala 2.10 / 2.11
broken
### What is this PR for?
As described in ZEPPELIN-1384, we may hit the following error when running
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1358
I think it's not an issue related with this PR but Helium itself.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user lresende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1376
[ZEPPELIN-449] Enhance log messages when interpreter is initializing
### What is this PR for?
Enhance log messages when interpreter is initializing to avoid user
confusion.
###
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1347
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user lresende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1347
LGTM, Do we need to wait on anything else to get this merged ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user lresende closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1373
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1373
Thanks @lresende for the fix and verification. But i think we already have
exactly the same fix at #1347.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1366
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user lresende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1374
[MINOR] Add new line before logging paragraph content
### What is this PR for?
Add new line before logging paragraph content
### What type of PR is it?
[Improvement]
You can
GitHub user doanduyhai reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/746
[ZEPPELIN-699] Add new synchronous paragraph run REST API
### What is this PR for?
Right now, when calling the REST API
`http://:/api/notebook/job//` Zeppelin always
returns **OK** as
Github user doanduyhai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/746
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user mfelgamal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1334
@bzz Gentle reminder!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user lresende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1373
After this fix is applied, have verified that can connect and execute a job
on a remote Spark cluster.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user doanduyhai reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/746
[ZEPPELIN-699] Add new synchronous paragraph run REST API
### What is this PR for?
Right now, when calling the REST API
`http://:/api/notebook/job//` Zeppelin always
returns **OK** as
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1358
@AhyoungRyu Thank you for reviewing!!
Did you clear your browser cache?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1302
I just changed to 'icon'.
Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1358
@astroshim Definitely in the latest master branch, I faced the below
exception when I tried to run
`org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.dev.ZeppelinApplicationDevServer` in my IDE.
```
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1302
@astroshim Great! Personally I would prefer "just icon" like the reload
notes icon in Zeppelin home.
But it's just my personal opinion. Final decision is up to you :)
---
If your project
Github user doanduyhai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/746
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user doanduyhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1369
@felixcheung
That's the main issue I'm facing now, how to **automate** test with
corporate firewall ... I'm going to ask someone to test the this PR at his
place (he has a corporate
40 matches
Mail list logo
