Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1426
@felixcheung DataFrame won't be affected, as it is handled in %livy.sql
(`LivySparkSQLInterpreter`). And since `ZeppelinContext` is not available in
livy, so you can not user `z.show(df)` in livy
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1452
LGTM
@zjffdu Do you mind trigger CI one more time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1453
Tested and LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user zjffdu reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1452
ZEPPELIN-1442. UDF can not be found due to 2 instances of SparkSession is
created
### What is this PR for?
The issue is that we create 2 SparkSession in zeppelin_pyspark.py (Because
we
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1440
Thanks for the fix.
LGTM and merge to master and branch-0.6 if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user agoodm reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1439
[ZEPPELIN-1423] Allow users to specify pre/post-execute callbacks for
interpreters
### What is this PR for?
One feature built-in to Jupyter's ipykernel that is currently missing in
Github user agoodm closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1439
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user r-kamath commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1429
@felixcheung I think either we remove "Copy of" or make it localizable.
Will wait comments from others before making the choice.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1439
That's great - would you like to update the rest of the file to make the
style consistent?
I understand the default value - I'm only pointing out that there are many
users and use
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1408
@kavinkumarks This look like a good start, but is it the only case we wan't
to handle here?
Maybe it's because of the way we test this PR, but if I change the system
notebook
SanAh Kang created ZEPPELIN-1479:
Summary: Blocking message pending 1 for BLOCKING
Key: ZEPPELIN-1479
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1479
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
Github user agoodm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1439
@felixcheung Sure thing, I can do that in a bit.
As for the issue of the default value for `replName`, are you simply
referring to the use case for different interpreters, or some variants
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1445
I believe so.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1415
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1446
@Leemoonsoo @jongyoul @felixcheung Please help review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
SanAh Kang created ZEPPELIN-1480:
Summary: Blocking message pending 1 for BLOCKING
Key: ZEPPELIN-1480
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1480
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
SanAh Kang created ZEPPELIN-1481:
Summary: Blocking message pending 1 for BLOCKING
Key: ZEPPELIN-1481
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1481
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1429
Except for the folder issue that @AhyoungRyu reported, I found another bug
where the number do not increment:
* Make a clone
* Go back to the original note
* Make another clone, the
Mina Lee created ZEPPELIN-1482:
--
Summary: Reload local dependencies to interpreter on restart if
the library has changed
Key: ZEPPELIN-1482
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1482
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1448
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1426
Thanks for the info, I agree that the long term solution would be using [
support multiple interpreter
result](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-212). But for livy
interpreter, it is
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1426
Add @felixcheung for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1290
@mwkang Just tested quickly, I will have to run more test to check the
behavior in general.
There is some refactoring needed, I left some comments.
Otherwise, a more global
Github user minahlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1449
@Leemoonsoo Thank you for pointing it out. I think changing the class name
to `Markdown` is more proper way to avoid compatibility issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1396
CI has passed. please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1429
@r-kamath Thanks for the improvement. It's better than just "Untitled Note
#" .
But regarding `Copy of`, I agree with @felixcheung. If an user tries to
clone a notebook in `this/is`,
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1339
I think
[ZEPPELIN-1101](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1101) can also
be resolved by this change.
>It looks related to ZEPPELIN-1099 which is about removing
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1431
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user minahlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1453
[ZEPPELIN-1482] Load updated dependency library on interpreter restart
### What is this PR for?
If user specifies library path in interpreter dependency setting, even when
the file on this
Github user mfelgamal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1334
@bzz rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1416
@rfilmyer Do you need any help? :D
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1446
I think we still support Spark 1.2, 1.3 officially so removing this might
be an issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Thanks Lee!
Il giorno lun 19 set 2016 alle ore 21:32 moon soo Lee ha
scritto:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> I don't know is there a way live debug without rebuild.
>
> To reduce build time, i leverage IDE, (intellij, eclipse), they can quickly
> build single file change into class without
Github user r-kamath commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1429
@felixcheung removed "Copy of" prefix.
@AhyoungRyu fixed folder related issue.
@corneadoug fixed sequence bug.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user r-kamath opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1455
Organize env.sh and site.xml config templates and docs
### What is this PR for?
Organize env.sh and site.xml config templates and docs
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement
GitHub user zjffdu reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1452
ZEPPELIN-1442. UDF can not be found due to 2 instances of SparkSession is
created
### What is this PR for?
The issue is that we create 2 SparkSession in zeppelin_pyspark.py (Because
we
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1439
right, I was referring when the interpreter group is not the default, or
there is multiple etc..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1350
Thanks for the contribution.
@mwkang Could you elaborate little bit more how this code change is related
to ZEPPELIN-1351?
ZEPPELIN-1351 is about displaying paragraph status when
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1452
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1426
I think the problem is if the output is a DataFrame now it can't be turned
into a table since %angular is already there because only the first type is
picked up? That would seem to me a
40 matches
Mail list logo