Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1210
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user corneadoug opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1337
[ZEPPELIN-1333] Fix Double Run when Shift + Enter on display form
### What is this PR for?
Display form input has a `ng-enter` catcher, so if you use SHIFT + ENTER,
the run function will
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1194
I do not think that node\npm version update are relevant - I was under
impression that it's all about dependency version update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1334
Before proceed with review - I have noticed that CI is failing.
@mfelgamal could you please take a look and make sure that there are no
Beam-related failures? Thanks!
So far there is
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1334
Thank you for addressing the feedback promptly! Please let me take another
pass on it and get back to you here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user onkarshedge commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1231
@bzz Here is the update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1341:
Summary: Build with profile scala-2.11 fails
Key: ZEPPELIN-1341
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1341
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Bug
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/989
@onkarshedge I would need a scenario/setup to be able to test it, could you
add it to the PR description?
Regarding the timeout function in front-end, I think it would be better to
send
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1335
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1335
@jongyoul I will close this issue since removing yarn profile is working.
please do it at the https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1301 as @zjffdu
mentioned.
---
If your project is set
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
@zjffdu I just tested and got success with removing the yarn profile.
I will close the https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1335 then.
Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1194
Didn't look into it,
If updating node/npm is supposed to remove this warning, then something is
wrong with its install or its usage during the build.
I'm also not really
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1305
This PR is going to have to wait,
When activating this option, things like:
`angular.element().scope().functionIWantToCall()` are not possible anymore.
We are relying on it to call 5
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1189
ping @Leemoonsoo in case you miss it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
Create umbrella ticket for multiple user support.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1337
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1340:
Summary: Impersonation for interpreter
Key: ZEPPELIN-1340
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1340
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Sub-task
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1339:
Summary: Note management per user
Key: ZEPPELIN-1339
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1339
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Sub-task
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1337:
Summary: Umbrella for multiple user support for zeppelin
Key: ZEPPELIN-1337
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1337
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1338:
Summary: User level interpreter setting
Key: ZEPPELIN-1338
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1338
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Sub-task
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1315
@rconline This PR makes Zeppelin server module include Hadoop-common 2.6.
How can I change the version of Hadoop? Or don't we need to change it even we
use Hadoop 1.x?
---
If your project is
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
@astroshim I can use spark 2.0 and hadoop 2.7 successfully. I hit this
issue when building zeppelin with profile yarn enabled. So please don't enable
yarn profile otherwise you will get hadoop
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
@sourav-mazumder 's suggestion is about another point of multiple user
support, this is might not be a trivial task to implement in this PR. I think
we have a discussion about the multiple-user
Github user mfelgamal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1334
@bzz The required changes is done, in the recent commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1302
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1296
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user onkarshedge commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/989
@bzz @corneadoug please review,it is complete. I have added the screenshot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Hi Vinay
Thanks for the quick answer.
I am a bit puzzled by your proposal. For the time being, I have been
succesful configuring Zeppelin without shiro by adding properties to the
Spark interpreter directly.
Would it be possible to to the same with appropriate property settings for
the jdbc
Guillaume,
Can you try this?
Enable Zeppelin authentication, via Shiro config and have Kerberos setup
for Zeppelin. Zeppelin JDBC interpreter should automatically add logged in
user's identity to the JDBC connection after this confg.
Note the settings below.
Thanks,
Vinay
ÃIdentity
Hi
I am a bit confused on the way to set up Zeppelin to use hive to access my data
on a kerberized cluster.
I looked at the doc and there is no mention about Kerberos settings. The only
place where I find some traces about that was in that pull request from June:
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1193
The reason of CI fails is..
```
Resolving deltas: 100% (13946/13946), completed with 385 local objects.
From https://github.com/apache/zeppelin
* branch
GitHub user astroshim reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1193
[ZEPPELIN-1192] Block pyspark paragraph hang.
### What is this PR for?
This PR block pyspark paragraph hang.
### What type of PR is it?
Bug Fix
### What is
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
@felixcheung Yes 2.2, Maybe it's because my maven repo has different
versions of hadoop libraries like following.
```
~/zeppelin$ ls -al ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
Looks like some of the Hadoop jars are 2.2 instead of 2.7?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user astroshim opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1335
[ZEPPELIN-1336] hadoop library for spark interpreter is not match.
### What is this PR for?
This PR is for download hadoop libraries for yarn cluster.
This issue comes from
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1318
I got a following error when I try to run zeppelin with spark2.0
```
ERROR [2016-08-16 16:43:33,121] ({pool-1-thread-3}
Utils.java[invokeMethod]:40) -
Github user onkarshedge commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1231
I tried the DHT code as a separate project
[code](https://gist.github.com/onkarshedge/796ca7fe0698952ffef92690eec0dd40).The
problem I am facing is notes with size greater than 1000 bytes does
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1231
Thank you for your explanation, what's your progress on refactoring current
impelemtation?
Let me try to re-visit points 1-5. Also, let's make sure that behavior of
BittorentRepo is
Congratulations, the Apache Zeppelin team & all community members! [image:
]
> Congratulations !!!
>
> Great turn around with required spark 2.0 support and fix for SparkR with
> Spark2.0.
>
> Regards,
> Sourav
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Hyung Sung Shim
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1334
Thank you for contributing @mfelgamal ! Apache Beam interpreter is a
valuable contribution many people are looking for.
There are few things that need to be done before we can merge it
Github user sourav-mazumder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
@jongyoul
I suggest while we enable this feature we also enable that user can access
only the data what he/she is authorized to.
For example if there is a folder/table in
Congratulations !!!
Great turn around with required spark 2.0 support and fix for SparkR with
Spark2.0.
Regards,
Sourav
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Hyung Sung Shim wrote:
> Congratulations for 0.6.1 release!
> Thank you for everyone especially mina.
>
> 2016-08-16
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1315
Merging this if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1334:
Summary: Environment variable defined in interpreter setting
doesn't take effect
Key: ZEPPELIN-1334
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1334
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1265
@zjffdu This is a first step for resolving security issues. For the next
step, I'll pass some properties for identifying user. BTW, InterpreterContext
includes user information, actually, thus
Github user mwkang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1330
@bzz I will check it. Thanks for review.
When I fix CI, I'll mention you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1256
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1242
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Congratulations for 0.6.1 release!
Thank you for everyone especially mina.
2016-08-16 16:57 GMT+09:00 Mina Lee >:
> The Apache Zeppelin community is pleased to announce the availability of
> the 0.6.1 release.
>
> Zeppelin
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/932
Thank you for your patience, @echarles
AFAIK CDDL 1.1 that jersey2 is distributed under belongs to ASF [Category B
license list](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b) so it
Congrats to the team!
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 at 10:12 Alexander Bezzubov wrote:
> Congratulations, everyone!
>
> And thank you Mina for putting it all together!
>
> https://twitter.com/ApacheZeppelin/status/765459508315303936
>
> --
> Alex
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Mina
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1301
@jongyoul do you want to take of docs update that @zjffdu mention in this
PR as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1311
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1311
CI is green now, so merging it in
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1248
Thank you for your patience @mwkang !
Sorry for the late notice, but could you please take a look and make sure
that code conforms the project styleguilde?
Will merge to master asap,
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/989
@onkarshedge what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Congratulations, everyone!
And thank you Mina for putting it all together!
https://twitter.com/ApacheZeppelin/status/765459508315303936
--
Alex
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Mina Lee wrote:
> The Apache Zeppelin community is pleased to announce the availability of
>
Awesome job!
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Mina Lee wrote:
> The Apache Zeppelin community is pleased to announce the availability of
> the 0.6.1 release.
>
> Zeppelin is a collaborative data analytics and visualization tool for
> distributed, general-purpose data
The Apache Zeppelin community is pleased to announce the availability of
the 0.6.1 release.
Zeppelin is a collaborative data analytics and visualization tool for
distributed, general-purpose data processing system such as Apache Spark,
Apache Flink, etc.
The community put significant effort into
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1331
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user beriaanirudh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1283
@corneadoug thanks for verifying.
@jongyoul Got it fixed now. I had mis-understood previously.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Is there anything specific for postgreSQL so that zeppelin didn't merge it
into the general jdbc interpreter ?
--
Best Regards
Jeff Zhang
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1330
Thank you for fixing it @mwkang
CI failure looks somehow relevant, you can not reproduce it locally?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1257
CI fails on web-app \w networking issue :\ which is not relevant here
```
Could not transfer artifact org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-io:pom:2.1.3 from/to
central
Github user Alucardkang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1332
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user Alucardkang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1332
Sqlserver 0.6.1 rc2
### What is this PR for?
A few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits.
First time? Check out the contributing guide -
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1295
@Leemoonsoo CI is green! would you help review it ? thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1193
CI is still red :\ Could you please post here the reason?
Other than that, looks good to me, merging to master if there is no further
discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you
67 matches
Mail list logo