>>> Same spark versions but multiple clusters. So based on logged in user,
we may want to route to different spark cluster or even let user choose the
spark he wants to connect to.
If you use standalone, you can set `master` in interpreter setting for
different standalone cluster. If using yarn,
1) Spark UI which works differently on EMR than standalone, so that logic
will be in an interpreter specific to emr.
Could you create a ticket for that, and please add details of that ? I
don't know exactly what the difference between EMR and standalone, we can
expose api to allow customization
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2757
@felixcheung @zjffdu can you please help review this?
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2709
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2758
---
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
[WIP] ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine
### What is this PR for?
A few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits.
First time? Check out the
Hi Jhon,
Do you mind to share what kind of custom function you want to add to spark
interpreter ? One idea in my mind is that we could add extension point to
the existing SparkInterpreter, and user can enhance SparkInterpreter via
these extension point. That means we just open some interfaces and
Hello!
I'm a software developer and as part of a project I require to extend the
functionality of SparkInterpreter without modifying it. I need instead
create a new interpreter that extends it or wrap its functionality.
I also need the spark sub-interpreters to use my new custom interpreter,
but
GitHub user HorizonNet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2759
ZEPPELIN-3202. Added missing test dependencies in the scio module
### What is this PR for?
Added missing test dependencies for the **scio** module to prevent test
failures when
Jan Hentschel created ZEPPELIN-3202:
---
Summary: Missing test dependencies in scio
Key: ZEPPELIN-3202
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3202
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type:
Jasper Knulst created ZEPPELIN-3201:
---
Summary: Detached Zeppelin processes after server shutdown
Key: ZEPPELIN-3201
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3201
Project: Zeppelin
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2757
Yes, I believe that is exactly what I'm trying to do over here, for example
in S3NotebookRepo, since none of checkpoint, get, revisionHistory, or
setNoteRevision is implemented
Github user jhonderson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2757
The methods for the versioning of the notes are defined at interface level
in NotebookRepo.java:
- Revision checkpoint(String noteId, String checkpointMsg,
AuthenticationInfo)
-
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2758
Thanks @HorizonNet LGTM
---
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2700
It is awsome if there's such button. But I don't know how to make such
button. BTW usually I would force push a dummy commit to trigger the build. And
I believe we should also fix these flaky test
Github user mohamagdy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2700
@zjffdu all good. I closed and reopened the pull request.
I would suggest making the process of rerunning Jenkins easier than closing
and reopening the pull request. This also triggers
GitHub user HorizonNet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2758
ZEPPELIN-3157. Fixed Checkstyle errors in hbase module
### What is this PR for?
Fixed Checkstyle issues in the **hbase** module.
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement
GitHub user prabhjyotsingh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2757
[ZEPPELIN-3198] UI should not show Version/GIT Control if the same if not
supported
### What is this PR for?
Currently, UI shows an option for version/GIT Control even when it is not
Github user mebelousov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2752
@felixcheung
Where I could document about ZEPPELIN_INTERPRETER_MAX_POOL_SIZE?
There is no such cases in documentation.
Also I cannot imagine than Zeppelin administrator will go
19 matches
Mail list logo
