[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1754: [ZEPPELIN-1800] Update scio doc - fix type $ should be...

2016-12-13 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1754
  
@felixcheung thanks for the review - tests fail, but I doubt it's due to 
this change.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1755: [ZEPPELIN-1801] To force end table - append %te...

2016-12-13 Thread ravwojdyla
GitHub user ravwojdyla opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1755

[ZEPPELIN-1801] To force end table - append %text

### What is this PR for?
It seems there is a bug in scio introduced by recent changes. Table 
rendered from scio helper methods would include interpreter results as well as 
the data.

### What type of PR is it?
Bug Fix

### Todos

### What is the Jira issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1801

### How should this be tested?
Try:
```
%beam.scio
val (sc, args) = ContextAndArgs(argz)
sc.parallelize(Seq("foo", "foo", "bar")).countByValue.closeAndDisplay()
```
before and after the change - and notice extra meaningless columns before 
the fix.

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/ravwojdyla/incubator-zeppelin fix_1801

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1755.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1755


commit 49bd51855defcfb289ec4327546a8ca5cd7bd157
Author: Rafal Wojdyla <r...@spotify.com>
Date:   2016-12-13T16:58:56Z

To force end table - append %text




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1754: [ZEPPELIN-1800] Update scio doc - fix type $ sh...

2016-12-13 Thread ravwojdyla
GitHub user ravwojdyla opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1754

[ZEPPELIN-1800] Update scio doc - fix type $ should be %

### What is this PR for?
Update scio doc - fix type $ should be %

### What type of PR is it?
Documentation

### Todos

### What is the Jira issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1800

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/ravwojdyla/incubator-zeppelin fix_1800

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1754.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1754


commit d4287a9ef84e2c3b2299d61fb8586862ecb6d91e
Author: Rafal Wojdyla <r...@spotify.com>
Date:   2016-12-13T15:42:20Z

Update scio doc - fix type $ should be %




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1633: Fix formatting/typos/style in scio doc

2016-11-14 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1633
  
Is jira ticket needed for this?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1633: Fix formatting/typos/style in scio doc

2016-11-14 Thread ravwojdyla
GitHub user ravwojdyla opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1633

Fix formatting/typos/style in scio doc

### What is this PR for?
Fix formatting/typos/style in scio doc

### What type of PR is it?
Documentation



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/ravwojdyla/incubator-zeppelin fix_scio_doc

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1633.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1633


commit 888ec68b4783f5e397bf7dd527bd5d65479a18dc
Author: Rafal Wojdyla <r...@spotify.com>
Date:   2016-11-15T00:26:37Z

Fix formatting/typos/style in scio doc




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-11-10 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
Those failures on travis seem unrelated - restarting build.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-11-08 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
Rebased to solve conflict in 
`zeppelin-distribution/src/bin_license/LICENSE`. Are there any other comments?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-31 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@felixcheung correct - i missed it - updated doc/examples.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-28 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
ping @felixcheung 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-24 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
ping @felixcheung 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-20 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@felixcheung after going through the `BeamInterpreter`, I don't see 
immediate technical advantage of sharing the group, current implementation of 
`BeamInterpreter`, is actually pure Java interpreter, they would not share any 
configuration. That said from strictly logical point of view it makes sense for 
them to be in the same group - given they share the same model.

What kind of changes are needed to put scio in the same group as beam? And 
what is gonna be the impact on users?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-20 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@felixcheung I see, thanks for help, is 95dd9bb enough?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-19 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@felixcheung well - yes and no. scio is currently being contributed to 
beam, but current implementation still uses dataflow sdk. maybe we can 
consolidate it once scio migration to beam is done?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-19 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
ping @Leemoonsoo @felixcheung 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-13 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@AhyoungRyu @zjffdu code was reviewed by @nevillelyh, build looks green. 
Any other comments?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-13 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@nevillelyh (the creator of scio) - could you please review.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-12 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@zjffdu @AhyoungRyu are there any other comments?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
The tests are failing for:

```
Tests run: 9, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 119.221 sec 
<<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT
testWidth(org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT)  Time 
elapsed: 21.445 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: New Width is : 4
Expected: 
 but: was 
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:865)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector$1.call(ErrorCollector.java:65)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkSucceeds(ErrorCollector.java:78)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkThat(ErrorCollector.java:63)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT.testWidth(ParagraphActionsIT.java:314)

testWidth(org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT)  Time 
elapsed: 21.445 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: New Width is : 8
Expected: 
 but: was 
at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:865)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector$1.call(ErrorCollector.java:65)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkSucceeds(ErrorCollector.java:78)
at org.junit.rules.ErrorCollector.checkThat(ErrorCollector.java:63)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.integration.ParagraphActionsIT.testWidth(ParagraphActionsIT.java:314)
```

I can't see the connection of those with this PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-07 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@AhyoungRyu updated licenses. The travis failures do not seems to be 
related could you please restart the travis jobs?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-05 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@AhyoungRyu sorry I missed it. Will go ahead and add all the licenses. 
Thanks!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-10-04 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
ping @AhyoungRyu @zjffdu 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-09-30 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@AhyoungRyu @zjffdu are there any more comment, how do you want to proceed? 
the error on travis does not seems to be related?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: Closes [ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-09-29 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@AhyoungRyu @zjffdu could you please review when your have time. all the 
todos are ✔️ 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1471: [WIP][ZEPPELIN-1505] Add Scio interpreter

2016-09-28 Thread ravwojdyla
Github user ravwojdyla commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471
  
@AhyoungRyu @zjffdu thanks for prompt review. I have some questions in the 
comments, plus fixes coming in. I have also changed the topic of the PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1471: Closes ZEPPELIN-1505: Add Scio interpreter

2016-09-28 Thread ravwojdyla
GitHub user ravwojdyla opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471

Closes ZEPPELIN-1505: Add Scio interpreter

### What is this PR for?
Closes #ZEPPELIN-1505. Adds Scio interpreter. Scio is a Scala DSL on top of 
Dataflow/Beam.

### What type of PR is it?
Improvement - ZEPPELIN-1505

### Todos
* [ ] - test integration with zeppelin context
* [ ] - what to do about code completion?
* [ ] - add more tests?

### What is the Jira issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1505

### How should this be tested?
```
mvn -pl scio,zeppelin-display,zeppelin-interpreter 
-Dtest='org.apache.zeppelin.scio.*' -DfailIfNoTests=false test
```

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/ravwojdyla/incubator-zeppelin scio

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1471.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1471


commit b85c3c028f13064345cb149f1d162c41d5bc4dba
Author: Rafal Wojdyla <r...@spotify.com>
Date:   2016-09-28T04:36:20Z

Add Scio interpreter

commit c8463c6540021b782851090ce359c263717905eb
Author: Rafal Wojdyla <r...@spotify.com>
Date:   2016-09-29T01:16:42Z

Add Scio interpreter tests




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---