[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-10-19 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 Not sure :) You can ask on dev@zeppelin.apache.org ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-10-19 Thread jexp
Github user jexp commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 @felixcheung just curious when is the next Zeppelin release planned ? :) Can't wait to see this out in the wild. ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-10-11 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 merged, thanks! ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-10-10 Thread conker84
Github user conker84 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 Thanks! ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-10-09 Thread jexp
Github user jexp commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 yay!! thanks so much. ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-10-09 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 since this is a known failure that is already fixed, let's not restart the process. merging if no more comment ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-10-08 Thread conker84
Github user conker84 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 Hi @felixcheung any news? Thanks Andrea ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-10-04 Thread jexp
Github user jexp commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 @felixcheung ping :) ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-10-02 Thread conker84
Github user conker84 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 @felixcheung the job [#10.2](https://travis-ci.org/conker84/zeppelin/jobs/282182858) fails... Can you help me? ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-09-27 Thread conker84
Github user conker84 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 @felixcheung travis is [failing](https://travis-ci.org/conker84/zeppelin), have i to rebase? ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-09-24 Thread jexp
Github user jexp commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 Yes please update. ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-09-24 Thread conker84
Github user conker84 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 Sorry for the late response, i lost it :( @jexp what do you think about this _(optional) shall we move neo4j-java-driver to 1.4.3, and neo4j 3.2.3?_ @felixcheung i'm updating the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-09-13 Thread jexp
Github user jexp commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 @felixcheung thank you. We've also received requests from others waiting for this PR :) ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-09-13 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 sorry for dropping this. will review shortly. ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-09-13 Thread conker84
Github user conker84 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 Hi guys, any news/plan about this? ---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-08-19 Thread conker84
Github user conker84 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 @felixcheung let me know if i have to do something else! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-08-19 Thread jexp
Github user jexp commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 @conker84 ping :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-08-08 Thread jexp
Github user jexp commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 @1ambda any update on the review progress? We really would love to see this feature in Apache Zeppelin :) Thanks a lot. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-08-07 Thread 1ambda
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 This is a new feature that makes utilizing graph type easily. Any other opinions? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-07-16 Thread 1ambda
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 Thanks for the great feature! since this is a big change, I guess it takes a time to review and requires multiple reviewers. Let me take a look. --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2478: [ZEPPELIN-2761] - Neo4j Interpreter

2017-07-11 Thread jexp
Github user jexp commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478 I looked through the code and the UX and can confirm that this is great work from a Neo4j point of view. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear