Hi All,
I asked this question before that how to ensure different notebooks can run
queries/statements in parallel.
And I got an answer that a PR tries to address that.
Can anyone please point me to that PR ?
Regards,
Sourav
Hello.
Maybe this PR(https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/703) is
what you're looking for?
2016-03-16 22:47 GMT+09:00 Sourav Mazumder :
> Hi All,
>
> I asked this question before that how to ensure different notebooks can run
> queries/statements in parallel.
>
> And I got an answer
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/775#issuecomment-198158584
Looks good :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/770#issuecomment-198108466
LGTM and merge if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/778#issuecomment-198063865
merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/775#issuecomment-198027388
Merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Moon - you committed to stay out of these issues. If you're going to be
involved at all, you should start by honoring the commitments you made in the
past.
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Leemoonsoo wrote:
>
> Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
>
>
> https://github.com/
Moon, your references to the "apache way" are laughable. As you yourself
showed, what's broken is CI, not the PR. You've committed numerous PRs that
broke CI. Dozens of them, if not hundreds.
The person who insisted on CI working is not you -- you said you would merge
208 without CI -- it was m
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/740#issuecomment-197996696
@doanduyhai Thanks for this new api and improvement.
Looks good to me and merge if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/781#issuecomment-197390511
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Amos,
No one blocks you working on 208 and no one said we're not merging 208 when
it's ready. So please stop accusing community member regarding progress of
208.
More important thing i think you need to care is "Collaboration".
You don't need to worry about 702. Alternative implementation is not
Github user fireboy1919 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/782#issuecomment-198351846
I was going to make a different request for each of those. I have one
ready for the second item, too, but i figured that smaller was better.
Sho
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/734#issuecomment-198036050
Is it okay to be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/784#issuecomment-198444595
Looks good to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/702#issuecomment-197717065
@echarles Can there be one integration test such as
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-server/src/test/java/org/apache/zeppe
Amos,
I had volunteered help fixing CI of 208. Hope you're able to distinguish
'wiling to help' and 'committed to do something'.
Please remember, everyone in this community are volunteers and no one
paid/committed to work on 208.
I think you have some misunderstanding of philosophy of Apache pro
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/770
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Moon - No-one in the community supported your refusal to fix CI. No-one
supported your license theory, but you refused to abandon it until two mentors
told you you were wrong. No-one supported your demand that 208 not be merged
without 702.
208 has waiting action on your part or your employees
Sangmin Yoon created ZEPPELIN-754:
-
Summary: Cannot use S3 seoul region (ap-northeast-2)
Key: ZEPPELIN-754
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-754
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type
Github user sourav-mazumder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/703#issuecomment-197444164
Hi,
I was just trying some of these. Looks like with this solution there would
be queue built up for running multiple paragraphs in parallel
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/778
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
This links to 703, which creates per-notebook interpreters and I'm now starting
to see problems with.
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 1:29 PM, sourav-mazumder wrote:
>
> Github user sourav-mazumder commented on the pull request:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/703#issuecomme
Github user jeffsteinmetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/702#issuecomment-198452586
@echarles
looks like this is ok now. returns an error as expected
```
%r
thisIsAnError
```
Still wondering why th
Github user michrawson commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/777#issuecomment-198391350
Failed due to network or npmjs.org or encryption or certs etc. Not because
of this PR.
[ERROR] npm http GET https://registry.npmjs.org/grunt-angul
Sami Jaktholm created ZEPPELIN-751:
--
Summary: Notebook list quietly truncated if Zeppelin cannot access
one note.json object in Amazon S3
Key: ZEPPELIN-751
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-751
Github user ankurmitujjain commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/761#issuecomment-198042725
Hi @corneadoug : Sorry I wrongly marked pivot chart data as complete...
Actually I have to remove that feature for now, I will be exploring on how
Hi all,
@ Moon, I will try doing as you told. Thank you!
I submitted a draft proposal for this project to AFS. Please could you
review it.
Thanks and regards
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:05 AM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you share little bit about how did you add jar manually?
> Did yo
Amos,
You seems always end up with personal attack and accuse someone when you
don't have reasonable answer. Your strategy is recognized well enough.
But, please understand that your strategy will never work in this
community. Moreover your strategy is very much against the 'Apache way'.
So, how
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/752
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/781
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
GitHub user prabhjyotsingh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/785
increase implicitlyWait for WebDriver
### What is this PR for?
This is with respect to travis build failure on `sendKeys`.
An implicit wait is to tell WebDriver to pol
Github user doanduyhai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/741#issuecomment-198697157
@Leemoonsoo
This PR should be straightforward
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Hello,
Please suggest improvements in the proposal draft at [0]. Also, any
references/hints about how to use Helium functionality in the project and
links to any documentation about Helium would be very helpful.
0.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Google+Summer+Of+Code+2016
T
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/725#issuecomment-198150918
@markncooper Thanks for the contribution.
If you're trying to drop limit of number of rows to be downloaded, how
about following approach?
Hi Anish,
Apologies for late response.
Regarding Helium functionality, it's about pluggable module of Zeppelin and
loading them on the fly.
Initial helium proposal [1] tried to make any user code packaged and runs
on notebook. Just like we import library and run it. Implementation is
working in p
Hi,
your proposal looks solid, I have updated the link from the wiki to a new
doc, as well as posted some feedback in comments.
Going further, Minudika, can you please incorporate Moon's feedback to the
new proposal, (est part on using a ResourcePool), and make sure that we
only have one document
Github user doanduyhai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/742#issuecomment-198716831
@Leemoonsoo
This PR too is straight forward, only JS changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Hi Anish,
your proposal looks great, but we need to add a few details, in order to
make it awesome.
I.e you do not mention which interpreters would be used for the notebook
implementations? Two most obvious candidates would be Spark, which you
already is familiar with and a Flink, which might req
Github user dnldxn commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/734#issuecomment-198226908
@granturing Yep, it works great on my Windows 10 system.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your feedback. I will make changes according to them.
However I submitted my draft proposal to Apache Software Foundation GSoC
page .
It seems like you have reviewed the old proposal of mine which was posted
in this thread.
Can you please have a look at my proposal which I sub
Github user fireboy1919 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/782#issuecomment-198048450
@Leemoonsoo: This is ready to go, and is based upon your previous work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/780#issuecomment-198239359
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Hi,
Could you share little bit about how did you add jar manually?
Did you try add dependency in pom.xml? like
group_id
artifact_id
version_number
system
...jar
Thanks,
moon
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:30 PM Minudika Malshan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am going to implement a sample java interprete
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-753:
-
Summary: ZeppelinTableData: Abstracts different table data set of
underlying computing framework.
Key: ZEPPELIN-753
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-753
GitHub user r-kamath opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/784
ZEPPELIN-748 make websocket maxTextMessageSize configurable
### What is this PR for?
Allow the user to modify the value for websocket maxTextMessageSize via
conf. Recently a user f
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/780#issuecomment-198102736
Any more comment?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Moon - 208 has been ready for merge for six months.
The reason it hasn't been merged is exclusively you--against the will of the
community.
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 10:34 PM, moon soo Lee wrote:
>
> Amos,
>
> No one blocks you working on 208 and no one said we're not merging 208 when
> it's re
Hi,
I am going to implement a sample java interpreter for zeppelin for demo
purposes in my proposal.
Since java-repl dependencies are not available as maven dependencies I had
to add those jars manually to the project.
But when I build the zeppelin project with the new changes I made, it
refuses t
GitHub user fireboy1919 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/782
Persist pool
### What is this PR for?
This is a step towards creating a REST endpoint from resource pools
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-699
It allows r
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/755#issuecomment-198103173
@karup1990 would you be updating this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Hi,
Thanks for sharing your proposal. I made few comments on the document.
Please take a look.
Thanks,
moon
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:16 AM Minudika Malshan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> @ Moon, I will try doing as you told. Thank you!
>
> I submitted a draft proposal for this project to AFS. Please c
GitHub user prabhjyotsingh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/783
upgrade angularJS from 1.3.x to 1.5.0 (stable)
### What is this PR for?
upgrade angularJS from 1.3.x to 1.5.0 (stable)
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement
Moon you committed in December to fix CI and merge 208. In February, having
broken your promise, you committed to stay out of it.
PPMC review has been *complete* since Dexember.
Your lack of integrity is truly astounding.
If you will not honor your commitment to stay out voluntarily, then per
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/781#issuecomment-197466910
Merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/782#issuecomment-198111341
@fireboy1919 are the ToDos list of items completed?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/777#issuecomment-198029435
Thanks for contribution. Some tests are failing after this change. Could
you take a look CI logs?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user elbamos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/208#issuecomment-197538863
@bzz Can you update us on the status of this? What is the ETA on making
progress with CI?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/786
[ZEPPELIN-755] Invalid notebook JSON file prevents Zeppelin daemon from
starting
### What is this PR for?
Invalid json file prevents Zeppelin daemon starting.
This PR catches
John Howard created ZEPPELIN-752:
Summary: Display last time run for paragraph
Key: ZEPPELIN-752
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-752
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Improvem
Github user jeffsteinmetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/702#issuecomment-198455912
@echarles
Can you explain the addition of the `spark.home` and `spark.master` to the
interpreter properties?
SPARK_HOME is set in the zeppelin
Github user granturing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/734#issuecomment-198037337
I have no more changes. @dnldxn were you able to validate the latest commit
on your setup?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Laurent Doguin created ZEPPELIN-756:
---
Summary: Support Couchbase N1QL query language
Key: ZEPPELIN-756
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-756
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type:
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/786#issuecomment-198845389
Thanks for fix, LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user karup1990 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/755#issuecomment-198204036
Will try to fix this over the weekend @felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Boris Shminke created ZEPPELIN-755:
--
Summary: Invalid notebook JSON file prevents Zeppelin daemon from
starting
Key: ZEPPELIN-755
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-755
Project: Zepp
65 matches
Mail list logo
