Re: [RESULT][VOTE] New name

*Apache Polygene* it is. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Jiri Jetmar wrote: > same here - Polygene > > 2016-12-04 18:51 GMT+01:00 Paul Merlin : > > > Le 2016-12-04 11:12, Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > > > >> 72 hours voting period is over, and I

[RESULT][VOTE] New name

72 hours voting period is over, and I think it is quite clear that we have consensus; Apache Aardworx = 1 vote Apache Accaly = 0 votes Apache Polygenic/Polygene = 6 votes Apache Vorticity = 1 vote Personally, I prefer "Apache Polygene", Toni has expressed the same view already. Any other

Re: [VOTE] New name

Keep thinking over the alternatives, yes Polygene would make more sense (semantically) than vorticity. Also, (personally) Polygene > Polygenic On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Paul Merlin wrote: > [x] Apache Polygenic/Polygene > > > Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > > Sorry to

Re: [VOTE] New name

[x] Apache Polygenic/Polygene Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > Sorry to bother about this again... > > Restarting the vote on name change, as no more suggestions have arrived; > > [ ] Apache Aardworx > [ ] Apache Accaly > [ ] Apache Polygenic/Polygene (decide later) > [ ] Apache Vorticity > > >

Re: [VOTE] New name

[ ] Apache Aardworx [ ] Apache Accaly [x] Apache Polygenic/Polygene (decide later) [ ] Apache Vorticity On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Sorry to bother about this again... > > Restarting the vote on name change, as no more suggestions have arrived; >

Re: [VOTE] New name

[ ] Apache Aardworx [ ] Apache Accaly [X] Apache Polygenic/Polygene [ ] Apache Vorticity On 1.12.2016 10:11, Niclas Hedhman wrote: Sorry to bother about this again... Restarting the vote on name change, as no more suggestions have arrived; [ ] Apache Aardworx [ ] Apache Accaly [X] Apache

Re: [VOTE] New name

> [x ] Apache Vorticity Bye, Sandro

Re: [VOTE] New name

[x ] Apache Vorticity Additional suggestion: Apache Techne: from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Techne "*Techne*" is a term, etymologically derived from the Greek word τέχνη (Ancient

[VOTE] New name

Sorry to bother about this again... Restarting the vote on name change, as no more suggestions have arrived; [ ] Apache Aardworx [ ] Apache Accaly [ ] Apache Polygenic/Polygene (decide later) [ ] Apache Vorticity Thanks -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New

Re: [VOTE] New name

:-( Yeah, I think all relationship to any mythology, science, philosophy, math, animals and more are kind of used up... Doing name search first, seems to be needed, yet it was quite a lot of effort for Zest when I did it. Niclas On Nov 22, 2016 16:42, "Paul Merlin"

Re: [VOTE] New name

My vote: > [ ] Apache Accaly > [X] Apache Akira > [ ] Apache Zeno > [ ] None of the above Sorry to bring potentially bad news. I've been quickly looking for projects already using one of those names. Found some: - https://github.com/Netflix/zeno - https://github.com/joshuabarnes/zeno -

Re: [VOTE] New name

My vote; [ ] Apache Accaly [ ] Apache Akira [x] Apache Zeno [ ] None of the above -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java

Re: [VOTE] New name

Hi , > [ ] Apache Accaly > [ ] Apache Akira > [X] Apache Zeno > [ ] None of the above cheers, Tibor

Re: [VOTE] New name

Hi all, > [ ] Apache Accaly > [X] Apache Akira > [ ] Apache Zeno > [ ] None of the above Bye, Sandro

Re: [VOTE] New name

[ ] Apache Accaly [ ] Apache Akira [x] Apache Zeno [ ] None of the above On 21.11.2016 10:17, Niclas Hedhman wrote: As previously discussed, we need to change name, to avoid conflict with Eclipse Foundation, and even though that there might be room for defending Apache Zest, I'd rather see

Re: [VOTE] New name

[ ] Apache Accaly [X] Apache Akira [ ] Apache Zeno [ ] None of the above Cheers - Sarvaratchagan From: Jiri Jetmar <juergen.jet...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 2:31 PM To: dev@zest.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] New name [ ] Apache

Re: [VOTE] New name

[ ] Apache Accaly [ ] Apache Akira [x ] Apache Zeno [ ] None of the above 2016-11-21 9:59 GMT+01:00 Georg Ragaller : > Am 2016-11-21 09:17, schrieb Niclas Hedhman: > >> As previously discussed, we need to change name, to avoid conflict with >> Eclipse Foundation, and even

Re: [VOTE] New name

Am 2016-11-21 09:17, schrieb Niclas Hedhman: As previously discussed, we need to change name, to avoid conflict with Eclipse Foundation, and even though that there might be room for defending Apache Zest, I'd rather see that we simply change name, before the first release under the new

[VOTE] New name

As previously discussed, we need to change name, to avoid conflict with Eclipse Foundation, and even though that there might be room for defending Apache Zest, I'd rather see that we simply change name, before the first release under the new namespace, i.e. Ver 3.0. Several suggestions have been