Re: Apache Polygene - Future Directions

For the question about "volunteer for Spring integration": *Roman!!!* Don't you work for the Spring Framework guys???!?!? On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Jiri Jetmar wrote: > > This are indeed valuable steps, but I fear that we can not follow the path > to the

Re: Apache Polygene - Future Directions

Hi Niclas, pls find my comments below in blue: 2016-12-18 9:54 GMT+01:00 Niclas Hedhman : > If I understand your intention (Christmas Wish) correctly, you want to > marry our pink unicorn with the green monster, or? > > :-) Well, not really to marry, but to give Polygene the

Re: Apache Polygene - Future Directions

If I understand your intention (Christmas Wish) correctly, you want to marry our pink unicorn with the green monster, or? I am not a Spring addict, and don't want to see a hard dependency on it. Work to strengthen the spring integration is most welcome, but I think need to be handled by someone

Apache Polygene - Future Directions

Hi Gang, now after the renaming activity is over (that is surely still ongoing, but at least we have a final name and a path), I think it is time to brainstorm about some future directions of Apache Polygene. >From my perspective Polygene is a DCI and COP oriented programming approach for Java