[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1615) minor typos in ZooKeeper Programmer's Guide web page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ganesh Singh updated ZOOKEEPER-1615: Attachment: Chapter 1 Introduction To Alternative Dispute Resolution In Colorado.htm

Success: ZOOKEEPER-1615 PreCommit Build #1325

Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1615 Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/1325/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1615) minor typos in ZooKeeper Programmer's Guide web page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13546806#comment-13546806 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1615: -- +1 overall. Here are the results of

Failed: ZOOKEEPER-1324 PreCommit Build #1326

Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1324 Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/1326/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1324) Remove Duplicate NEWLEADER packets from the Leader to the Follower.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flavio Junqueira updated ZOOKEEPER-1324: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1324.patch What about this change? I still need to clean

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1324) Remove Duplicate NEWLEADER packets from the Leader to the Follower.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547301#comment-13547301 ] Thawan Kooburat commented on ZOOKEEPER-1324: I understand the fact that

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1324) Remove Duplicate NEWLEADER packets from the Leader to the Follower.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547355#comment-13547355 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1324: - Having a different method

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-1616) time calculations should use a monotonic clock

Todd Lipcon created ZOOKEEPER-1616: -- Summary: time calculations should use a monotonic clock Key: ZOOKEEPER-1616 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1616 Project: ZooKeeper

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1616) time calculations should use a monotonic clock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547589#comment-13547589 ] liang xie commented on ZOOKEEPER-1616: -- Cl, [~tlipcon] One thing need to

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1423) 4lw and jmx should expose the size of the datadir/datalogdir

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Edward Ribeiro updated ZOOKEEPER-1423: -- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1423.patch Hi folks, I am sending a *first* version of a

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1616) time calculations should use a monotonic clock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547649#comment-13547649 ] Ted Dunning commented on ZOOKEEPER-1616: Uh... I thought we patched this ages

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1616) time calculations should use a monotonic clock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547651#comment-13547651 ] Ted Dunning commented on ZOOKEEPER-1616: Todd, Can you fill in the versions

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1423) 4lw and jmx should expose the size of the datadir/datalogdir

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Edward Ribeiro updated ZOOKEEPER-1423: -- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1423.patch 4lw and jmx should expose the size of the

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1423) 4lw and jmx should expose the size of the datadir/datalogdir

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Edward Ribeiro updated ZOOKEEPER-1423: -- Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-1423.patch) 4lw and jmx should expose the

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1615) minor typos in ZooKeeper Programmer's Guide web page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ganesh Singh updated ZOOKEEPER-1615: Attachment: (was: Chapter 1 Introduction To Alternative Dispute Resolution In

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1616) time calculations should use a monotonic clock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547731#comment-13547731 ] Marshall McMullen commented on ZOOKEEPER-1616: -- Ted, ZOOKEEPER-1366 was

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-506) Provide better topic release algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13546723#comment-13546723 ] Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-506: -- Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-506 Patch

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Bigtop 0.5.0 release

I think to start we could create bigtop components for bookkeeper-server and bkjournal manager, as these fix most directly into the hadoop eco-system. I haven't looked much into what is involved in packaging for bigtop, but I can start looking once the BK 4.2.0 release is out (should be thursday

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Bigtop 0.5.0 release

As for use cases, we have a poweredby page listing the ones we know of: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/PoweredBy -Flavio On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Ivan Kelly iv...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: I think to start we could create bigtop components for bookkeeper-server and

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-530) data might be lost during compaction.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan Kelly updated BOOKKEEPER-530: -- Attachment: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-530-data-might-be-lost-during-compaction.patch Patch addresses

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-530) data might be lost during compaction.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13546958#comment-13546958 ] Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-530: --- {quote} 3)I'm bit confused about the

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-530) data might be lost during compaction.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13546974#comment-13546974 ] Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-530: -- Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-530 Patch

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-530) data might be lost during compaction.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan Kelly updated BOOKKEEPER-530: -- Attachment: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-530-data-might-be-lost-during-compaction.patch Forgot to add

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-530) data might be lost during compaction.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547000#comment-13547000 ] Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-530: -- Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-530 Patch

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-531) Cache thread should wait until old entries are collected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547029#comment-13547029 ] Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-531: --- The change looks good. Work is

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-533) TestSubAfterCloseSub fails strangely in tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan Kelly updated BOOKKEEPER-533: -- Attachment: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-530-data-might-be-lost-during-compaction.patch Patch removes

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-533) TestSubAfterCloseSub fails strangely in tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547070#comment-13547070 ] Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-533: -- Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-533 Patch

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-533) TestSubAfterCloseSub fails strangely in tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan Kelly updated BOOKKEEPER-533: -- Attachment: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-533-TestSubAfterCloseSub-fails-strangely-.patch Attached wrong

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-538) Race condition in BookKeeper#close

Ivan Kelly created BOOKKEEPER-538: - Summary: Race condition in BookKeeper#close Key: BOOKKEEPER-538 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-538 Project: Bookkeeper Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-530) data might be lost during compaction.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547100#comment-13547100 ] Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-530: - bq.This is what we do. The code adds to the

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-538) Race condition in BookKeeper#close

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan Kelly updated BOOKKEEPER-538: -- Attachment: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-538-Race-condition-in-BookKeeper-close.patch Race

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-533) TestSubAfterCloseSub fails strangely in tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547112#comment-13547112 ] Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-533: -- Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-533 Patch

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-538) Race condition in BookKeeper#close

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547119#comment-13547119 ] Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-538: -- Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-538 Patch

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-533) TestSubAfterCloseSub fails strangely in tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547423#comment-13547423 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-533: - It looks good, one quick

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-538) Race condition in BookKeeper#close

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547537#comment-13547537 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on BOOKKEEPER-538: DO you think we have

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-49) bookkeeper - parallel async read same entry of same ledger will fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matteo Merli updated BOOKKEEPER-49: --- Attachment: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-49-bookkeeper-parallel-async-read-same-en.patch I have this

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-538) Race condition in BookKeeper#close

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547588#comment-13547588 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on BOOKKEEPER-538: oops there was a

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-49) bookkeeper - parallel async read same entry of same ledger will fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547620#comment-13547620 ] Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-49: - thanks [~mmerli]. this patch is actually

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Bigtop 0.5.0 release

Also, as far as BookKeeper concerned -- I'd live to understand what's involved in using it as a HA solution for HDFS and whether there's anybody interested in pursuing this direction. As Hadoop-2 has a chance to plug in the Journal implementations, BookKeeperJournalManager is the

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-531) Cache thread should wait until old entries are collected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sijie Guo updated BOOKKEEPER-531: - Attachment: BOOKKEEPER-531.patch Attach a new patch to address the comments. 1) change

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-539) ClientNotSubscribedException doesn't receive enough messages in TestThrottlingDelivery#testServerSideThrottle

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sijie Guo updated BOOKKEEPER-539: - Attachment: org.apache.hedwig.server.delivery.TestThrottlingDelivery-output.txt

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-539) ClientNotSubscribedException doesn't receive enough messages in TestThrottlingDelivery#testServerSideThrottle

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547689#comment-13547689 ] Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-539: -- the test case failed in Multiplex hedwig

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-529) stopServingSubscriber in delivery manager should remove stub callbacks in ReadAheadCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sijie Guo updated BOOKKEEPER-529: - Fix Version/s: (was: 4.3.0) 4.2.0 stopServingSubscriber in

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-529) stopServingSubscriber in delivery manager should remove stub callbacks in ReadAheadCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547706#comment-13547706 ] Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-529: -- move 4.2.0 release, since it would

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-529) stopServingSubscriber in delivery manager should remove stub callbacks in ReadAheadCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sijie Guo updated BOOKKEEPER-529: - Attachment: BOOKKEEPER-529.diff attach a new patch rebased to latest trunk.

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-249) Revisit garbage collection algorithm in Bookie server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547711#comment-13547711 ] Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-249: -- [~fpj] is there any update on your

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-538) Race condition in BookKeeper#close

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547726#comment-13547726 ] Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-538: -- sounds great. I agreed that moving

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-529) stopServingSubscriber in delivery manager should remove stub callbacks in ReadAheadCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547728#comment-13547728 ] Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-529: -- Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-529 Patch

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-530) data might be lost during compaction.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13547730#comment-13547730 ] Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-530: -- yeah, good point, Rakesh. Compaction