[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14243864#comment-14243864
]
Rakesh R commented on ZOOKEEPER-2091:
-
bq.I am confused how it reads the returning
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-ibm6/704/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 361384 lines...]
[junit] 2014-12-12 09:32:18,574
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/2529/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 330090 lines...]
[junit] 2014-12-12 11:10:53,928
On Dec. 11, 2014, 7:37 p.m., Rakesh R wrote:
src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxnSocketNetty.java, line 108
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/28/?file=789550#file789550line108
bootstrap.setOption(connectTimeoutMillis,
System.getProperty(connectTimeoutMillis));
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk7/139/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 336860 lines...]
[exec] mv -f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14244534#comment-14244534
]
Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-2091:
--
Did you try only loop writing in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/
---
(Updated Dec. 12, 2014, 7:16 p.m.)
Review request for zookeeper.
Repository:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14244659#comment-14244659
]
Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2091:
-
I agree that it seems like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14244672#comment-14244672
]
Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-2091:
--
bq. then allow another read to
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-openjdk7/658/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 329349 lines...]
[junit] 2014-12-12
Hi all,
I have been working on Netty + SSL and one of the changes I do is change
outgoingQueue to be LinkedBlockingDeque, which requires JDK 6.
As Flavio (fpj) and Patrick (phunt) suggested, there are JIRAs discussing
JDK7: ZOOKEEPER-2046, ZOOKEEPER-1963. It seems many people are interested
in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14244861#comment-14244861
]
Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2091:
-
I'm all the way in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14244878#comment-14244878
]
Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-2091:
--
Thanks [~fournc] for the in-depth
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14244892#comment-14244892
]
Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-2091:
-
I agree [~hdeng] but I'm
On Dec. 11, 2014, 11:16 p.m., fpj wrote:
src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxn.java, line 1472
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/28/?file=789547#file789547line1472
I'm now confused by this change. Are you getting rid of enableWrite?
saslCompleted is fairly different
On Dec. 11, 2014, 11:16 p.m., fpj wrote:
src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxn.java, line 134
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/28/?file=789547#file789547line134
It sounds like making pendingQueue and outgoingQueue are optimizations
that are independent from this
+1 for supporting only 7 or later.
On 12 Dec 2014, at 21:28, Hongchao Deng hd...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have been working on Netty + SSL and one of the changes I do is change
outgoingQueue to be LinkedBlockingDeque, which requires JDK 6.
As Flavio (fpj) and Patrick (phunt)
On Dec. 11, 2014, 11:16 p.m., fpj wrote:
src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxn.java, line 134
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/28/?file=789547#file789547line134
It sounds like making pendingQueue and outgoingQueue are optimizations
that are independent from this
+1 Makes sense to me.
I'm assuming we're talking 3.5+ here, right? We would continue to
support jdk6 in 3.4?
Patrick
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Flavio Junqueira
fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
+1 for supporting only 7 or later.
On 12 Dec 2014, at 21:28, Hongchao Deng
+1 for 3.5+
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1 Makes sense to me.
I'm assuming we're talking 3.5+ here, right? We would continue to
support jdk6 in 3.4?
Patrick
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Flavio Junqueira
fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
On Dec. 11, 2014, 11:16 p.m., fpj wrote:
src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxn.java, line 134
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/28/?file=789547#file789547line134
It sounds like making pendingQueue and outgoingQueue are optimizations
that are independent from this
Right. We are discussing on ZK 3.5+
- Hongchao Deng
From: ph...@apache.org
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:53:17 -0800
Subject: Re: Make JDK 7 the minimum support version
To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
CC: u...@zookeeper.apache.org
+1 Makes sense to me.
I'm assuming we're talking 3.5+ here,
On Dec. 11, 2014, 11:16 p.m., fpj wrote:
src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxn.java, line 134
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/28/?file=789547#file789547line134
It sounds like making pendingQueue and outgoingQueue are optimizations
that are independent from this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14245244#comment-14245244
]
Rakesh R commented on ZOOKEEPER-2091:
-
bq.Did you try only loop writing in
24 matches
Mail list logo
