See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk7/283/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 358743 lines...]
[junit] 2015-05-03
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008/1784/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 108 lines...]
[javacc] File
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris/1020/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
Started by timer
Building remotely on solaris1 (Solaris) in
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/875/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 211352 lines...]
[junit] 2015-05-03
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14526090#comment-14526090
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2171:
---
The failure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14526087#comment-14526087
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2670/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch
uploading same patch, to trigger
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2671/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch)
avoid reverse lookups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch)
avoid reverse lookups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch)
avoid reverse lookups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch)
avoid reverse lookups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch
another try given that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch)
avoid reverse lookups
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2672/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
On 2 May 2015 at 15:45, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I'd say if it's a blocker and it's ready (or close to ready) then wait. Otw
let's get the release out. It's ok for the alphas to have blockers, we'll
catch them up in the next release.
fwiw, ZOOKEEPER-2171 has a +1 from Rakesh and
I've pushed back on use of sleep in non-deterministic ways in the past. I
think we do a reasonable job there, just grepping for sleep doesn't tell
the story.
Where you run into issues is when you
do x
sleep(500)
check x was success
Most of our use of sleep has migrated to
do x
for (1 to 120)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14526264#comment-14526264
]
Alexander Shraer commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
-
I also couldn't reproduce,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14526236#comment-14526236
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2124:
---
+1, lgtm.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14526245#comment-14526245
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
---
It passes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14526269#comment-14526269
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
---
Actually, it's
Hongchao recently identified a long standing issue in sync that originally
looked like it might be a flakey test. While flakeys are commonly a
test/host issue it's also important to review the issues carefully lest we
ignore real problems. I've found that reviewing the jenkins results from
past
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14526266#comment-14526266
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
---
Hmmm,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14526272#comment-14526272
]
Alexander Shraer commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
-
I see. thanks for looking
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/865/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 214771 lines...]
[junit] 2015-05-03
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008/1785/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 110 lines...]
[javacc] File
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525912#comment-14525912
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-1626:
---
thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch
Replace the remaining getHostName
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525956#comment-14525956
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-1077:
---
Thanks for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525964#comment-14525964
]
Chris Nauroth commented on ZOOKEEPER-2174:
--
[~rgs], [~hdeng] and [~rakeshr],
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525987#comment-14525987
]
Chris Nauroth commented on ZOOKEEPER-1626:
--
The parent ZOOKEEPER-1366 jira
Hi all,
This has probably come up before but do we have any thoughts on making CI
better? Is the problem jenkins? Is it flaky tests? Bad CI workers? All of
the above?
I see we waste loads of time with trivial (or unrelated to the actual
failures) patches triggering failed builds all the time.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-1077:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.4.7
C client lib doesn't build on Solaris
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525928#comment-14525928
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2171:
---
Thanks for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525957#comment-14525957
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-1077:
---
+1, lgtm.
Hi Raúl,
Thanks for starting this thread. Flaky CI is a big challenge for us in
Hadoop too. I can speak to some things that we've done to try to improve
it. We're still struggling, but some of these have helped improve the
situation.
We recently rewrote our test-patch.sh with a lot of nice
37 matches
Mail list logo