[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16661753#comment-16661753
]
Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-3163:
---
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build ZooKeeper-trunk #246 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16661701#comment-16661701
]
Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-3163:
---
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16661697#comment-16661697
]
Akira Ajisaka commented on ZOOKEEPER-3181:
--
Recently Apache Hadoop upgraded ZooKeeper from
Akira Ajisaka created ZOOKEEPER-3181:
Summary: ZOOKEEPER-2355 broke Curator TestingQuorumPeerMain
Key: ZOOKEEPER-3181
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3181
Project: ZooKeeper
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/245/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 334.69 KB...]
[exec] : elapsed 1001 : OK
[exec]
Github user hanm closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/642
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/665
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Han resolved ZOOKEEPER-3163.
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by pull request 665
Github user enixon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/628
The tests that fail are not entirely consistent. I've tried disabling
TestLogClientEnv.cc, TestReadOnlyClient.cc, TestReconfigServer.cc, and
TestWatchers.cc and this seems to work some of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16661452#comment-16661452
]
Michael Han commented on ZOOKEEPER-3180:
What will be we caching here? Is it the byte buffers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16661432#comment-16661432
]
Michael Han commented on ZOOKEEPER-3179:
Good feature.
We can also consider provide the
Github user hanm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/628
>> This patch does not touch the c client or the default configurations for
those tests so I'm unsure how to proceed.
My feeling is the failure is a flaky test, and has nothing to do with
Github user hanm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/628
I am looking at
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/2486/console,
it was not clear to me which C test failed, aside from the ``./zktest-mt':
free(): invalid pointer:
Github user enixon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/628
@anmolnar : I see that you closed #660 without merging. Given that we're
guessing it is the cause for the remaining test failures of this PR, is there
something that I can do to to help address
Github user eolivelli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/673#discussion_r227557275
--- Diff:
zookeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zookeeper/server/ZooKeeperServer.java
---
@@ -1107,6 +1102,19 @@ public void
Github user lvfangmin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/632#discussion_r227533265
--- Diff:
zookeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zookeeper/server/util/AdHash.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user lvfangmin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/632#discussion_r227532976
--- Diff:
zookeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zookeeper/server/command/HashCommand.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the
Github user lvfangmin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/673#discussion_r227532671
--- Diff:
zookeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zookeeper/server/ZooKeeperServer.java
---
@@ -1107,6 +1102,19 @@ public void
Github user lvfangmin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/665
@maoling, we can port this back to 3.4 in the same Jira, I'll send out a PR
separately for that.
---
Michael,
I wouldn't characterize the current proposal as broken so much as it talks
about connection balancing rather than server balancing. Other than that, I
think I agree with what you are saying.
So we have two folks with a feeling that server balancing from the client
side is significantly
+1 (for keep server, client and common together).
We can do client / server split separately. Interestingly, there was an
outstanding JIRA about the split, which we could use after maven build is
live: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-233
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 3:30 AM Andor
>> Will there be a code effect?
There will be - the current rebalancing algorithm will be broken if no code
is done to StaticHostProvider.updateServerList to teach it aware of
multiple server addresses belong to the same server. For example, currently
if we add a new server through reconfig, the
Github user lavacat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/300
@anmolnar applied the patch to latest master and run tests 10 times with 8
threads. Original error in testNodeDataChanged is gone, but it failed 4 times
with
2018-10-23 09:37:31,566 [myid:] -
There have been several comments on the document. I will be porting discussions
from the document back to the mailing list each day.
Alex Shraer makes a good point that with the design as stated, there is no
provision for dealing with the rebalancing of client connections during dynamic
Congrats, Michael,
Really cool blog post. :)
Em seg, 15 de out de 2018 05:26, Norbert Kalmar
escreveu:
> Good blog post!
> Can't wait for the PRs ;)
> I'm very positive about ZooKeeper's future (heard lot of talks lately about
> etcd overthrowing ZooKeeper - no chance :) )
>
> Norbert
>
> On
25 matches
Mail list logo