Re: Pure Python bindings

2012-03-20 Thread Ted Dunning
Far from having a problem, I think that you would get a fair bit of support if you wanted to work on this! On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > I take the silence to mean that the answer is no. Would anyone have a > problem if I worked on such a beast? >

Re: Pure Python bindings

2012-03-20 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> I take the silence to mean that the answer is no. Would anyone have a >> problem if I worked on such a beast? > > You saw this right? afaik there isn't. > https://cwiki.apache.org/con

Re: Pure Python bindings

2012-03-20 Thread Patrick Hunt
> > On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >> It would be handy if there were pure Python bindings available.  Are there >> any? >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >

Re: Pure Python bindings

2012-03-20 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
I take the silence to mean that the answer is no. Would anyone have a problem if I worked on such a beast? Regards, Alan On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > It would be handy if there were pure Python bindings available. Are there > any? > > > Regards, > Alan >

Pure Python bindings

2012-03-19 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
It would be handy if there were pure Python bindings available. Are there any? Regards, Alan