See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008/1784/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 108 lines...]
[javacc] File "SimpleCharStream.
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris/1020/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
Started by timer
Building remotely on solaris1 (Solaris) in works
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/875/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 211352 lines...]
[junit] 2015-05-03 09:09:26,596
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/865/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 214771 lines...]
[junit] 2015-05-03 09:37:16
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk7/283/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 358743 lines...]
[junit] 2015-05-03 10:21:02,358
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk8/371/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 361085 lines...]
[junit] 2015-05-03 11:05:46,056 [m
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008/1785/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 110 lines...]
[javacc] File "SimpleCharStream.
Hi all,
This has probably come up before but do we have any thoughts on making CI
better? Is the problem jenkins? Is it flaky tests? Bad CI workers? All of
the above?
I see we waste loads of time with trivial (or unrelated to the actual
failures) patches triggering failed builds all the time. I'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14525912#comment-14525912
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-1626:
---
thanks [~cnauro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14525928#comment-14525928
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2171:
---
Thanks for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch
Replace the remaining getHostName c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-1077:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.4.7
> C client lib doesn't build on Solaris
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14525956#comment-14525956
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-1077:
---
Thanks for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14525957#comment-14525957
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-1077:
---
+1, lgtm.
[~m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14525964#comment-14525964
]
Chris Nauroth commented on ZOOKEEPER-2174:
--
[~rgs], [~hdeng] and [~rakeshr],
Hi Raúl,
Thanks for starting this thread. Flaky CI is a big challenge for us in
Hadoop too. I can speak to some things that we've done to try to improve
it. We're still struggling, but some of these have helped improve the
situation.
We recently rewrote our test-patch.sh with a lot of nice new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14525987#comment-14525987
]
Chris Nauroth commented on ZOOKEEPER-1626:
--
The parent ZOOKEEPER-1366 jira ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526087#comment-14526087
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of test
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2670/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526090#comment-14526090
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2171:
---
The failure hap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch
uploading same patch, to trigger te
Hongchao recently identified a long standing issue in sync that originally
looked like it might be a flakey test. While flakeys are commonly a
test/host issue it's also important to review the issues carefully lest we
ignore real problems. I've found that reviewing the jenkins results from
past run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526236#comment-14526236
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2124:
---
+1, lgtm.
[~cn
On 2 May 2015 at 15:45, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> I'd say if it's a blocker and it's ready (or close to ready) then wait. Otw
> let's get the release out. It's ok for the alphas to have blockers, we'll
> catch them up in the next release.
>
fwiw, ZOOKEEPER-2171 has a +1 from Rakesh and is ready to b
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2671/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526237#comment-14526237
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales reopened ZOOKEEPER-2080:
---
Assignee: Raul Gutierrez Segales
This just failed for me:
https
Hi,
On 3 May 2015 at 12:53, Chris Nauroth wrote:
> ()
> 3. Tests are non-deterministic, such as by hard-coding a sleep time to
> wait for an asynchronous action to complete. The solutions usually
> involve providing hooks into lower-layer logic, such as to receive a
> callback from the asyn
On 3 May 2015 at 20:53, Patrick Hunt wrote:
(...)
> Trunk tests seem pretty stable - where I do see issues recently it's mostly
> a single test that seems to be intermittently failing:
> ReconfigRecoveryTest.testCurrentObserverIsParticipantInNewConfig
> I see someone opened a jira then closed it,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526245#comment-14526245
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
---
It passes prett
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch)
> avoid reverse lookups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch)
> avoid reverse lookups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch)
> avoid reverse lookups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch)
> avoid reverse lookups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch)
> avoid reverse lookups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales updated ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2171.patch
another try given that
ReconfigRec
I've pushed back on use of sleep in non-deterministic ways in the past. I
think we do a reasonable job there, just grepping for sleep doesn't tell
the story.
Where you run into issues is when you
do x
sleep(500)
check x was success
Most of our use of sleep has migrated to
do x
for (1 to 120) //
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2672/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526264#comment-14526264
]
Alexander Shraer commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
-
I also couldn't reproduce,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526266#comment-14526266
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
---
Hmmm, interesti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526269#comment-14526269
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
---
Actually, it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526272#comment-14526272
]
Alexander Shraer commented on ZOOKEEPER-2080:
-
I see. thanks for looking i
Thanks Raul, I'll review and commit ZOOKEEPER-2171. Please go ahead
and check in ZOOKEEPER-2124 for 3.5.1.
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
wrote:
> On 2 May 2015 at 15:45, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>
>> I'd say if it's a blocker and it's ready (or close to ready) then wait.
>>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526299#comment-14526299
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of test
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2673/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2674/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526303#comment-14526303
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2171:
--
+1 overall. Here are the results of test
On 3 May 2015 at 23:07, Michi Mutsuzaki wrote:
> Thanks Raul, I'll review and commit ZOOKEEPER-2171.
Test passed now:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2674/
> Please go ahead
> and check in ZOOKEEPER-2124 for 3.5.1.
>
Sure.
-rgs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526311#comment-14526311
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-2124:
---
Merged:
trunk:
On 3 May 2015 at 23:26, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote:
>
> On 3 May 2015 at 23:07, Michi Mutsuzaki wrote:
>
>> Thanks Raul, I'll review and commit ZOOKEEPER-2171.
>
>
> Test passed now:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2674/
>
>
>> Please go ahead
>> and check in ZOOKEEPE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rakesh R updated ZOOKEEPER-2124:
Fix Version/s: 3.4.7
> Allow Zookeeper version string to have underscore '_'
> -
OK, I got it. Thanks for the inputs.
Best Regards,
Rakesh
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:ph...@apache.org]
Sent: 03 May 2015 04:15
To: DevZooKeeper
Cc: Michi Mutsuzaki
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.1-alpha candidate 0
I'd say if it's a blocker and it's
52 matches
Mail list logo