Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1849/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 85.45 MB...]
[exec]
Norbert,
thank you for taking a look
Il giorno gio 21 giu 2018 alle ore 11:58 Norbert Kalmar
ha scritto:
> Good question. Wouldn't just killing the leader do the job?
>
It seems to me that is it not "immediate" to "kill" a QuorumPeer inside
such test.
If you "shutdown" it you cannot 'start' it
Good question. Wouldn't just killing the leader do the job?
Regards,
Norbert
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:51 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> This is my patch
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/546
>
> One question:
> I would like to force the cluster to change leader in
>
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34/2386/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 28.71 KB...]
[exec] Total time: 0 minutes 14
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
maoling reassigned ZOOKEEPER-2989:
--
Assignee: maoling
> IPv6 literal address causes problems for Quorum members
>
Github user nkalmar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/546#discussion_r197072479
--- Diff:
src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/HierarchicalQuorumTest.java ---
@@ -226,38 +226,71 @@ void startServers(boolean withObservers) throws
Hi Enrico!
Take a look at testElectionFraud(), it might be useful to you.
Regards,
Andor
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Norbert,
> thank you for taking a look
>
> Il giorno gio 21 giu 2018 alle ore 11:58 Norbert Kalmar
> ha scritto:
>
> > Good question. Wouldn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16519284#comment-16519284
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-3066:
--
-1 overall. GitHub Pull Request Build
+1
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/546
@nkalmar @ivankelly
thanks for your help
I have added a restart of the first 3 servers in the cluster.
This is enough to see leadership change, but I did not add specific
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
maoling updated ZOOKEEPER-2989:
---
Description:
We're using ZK 3.5.3-beta.
When using literal IPv6 addresses in the
Andor,
I had already tried that way but without success.
I have updated the patch with a proposal.
Thanks
Enrico
Il gio 21 giu 2018, 13:20 Andor Molnar ha
scritto:
> Hi Enrico!
>
> Take a look at testElectionFraud(), it might be useful to you.
>
> Regards,
> Andor
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018
Hi Patrick,
In my opinion terminating support for java 1.6 is a good idea. Even it's
extended support will end this year (
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html).
And the projects I've seen are all updated from java 6 by now, especially
as more and more libraries and
FYI - I believe we're seeing:
https://blog.sonatype.com/enhancing-ssl-security-and-http/2-support-for-central
ivy-download:
[get] Getting:
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.4.0/ivy-2.4.0.jar
[get] To:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/1963/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 3.51 KB...]
clean:
[echo] contrib: zkpython
Okay, let's put it this way: what kind of test would you like to add here?
*Unit test*
This is a requirement for the patch to be committed. You don't need to fire
up a full blown ensemble to test the new functionality. Pick the class that
you'd like to test, mock out the dependencies with moquito
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/1964/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 3.74 KB...]
clean:
[echo] contrib: zkpython
Il gio 21 giu 2018, 17:13 Andor Molnar ha
scritto:
> Okay, let's put it this way: what kind of test would you like to add here?
>
> *Unit test*
> This is a requirement for the patch to be committed. You don't need to fire
> up a full blown ensemble to test the new functionality. Pick the class
Github user ivmaykov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/184
@anmolnar actually I think the UnifiedSocket approach is fine for now, it
works. It can be cleaned up to use the java 8 socket API in a separate pull
request later.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16519839#comment-16519839
]
Brian Nixon commented on ZOOKEEPER-3056:
As a work-around for anyone currently blocked on
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/1966/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 40.75 KB...]
[junit] Running
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16519955#comment-16519955
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-3059:
--
-1 overall. GitHub Pull Request Build
+1
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1850/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 86.68 MB...]
[exec]
+1 for discontinuing support for jdk1.6
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Norbert Kalmar <
nkal...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> In my opinion terminating support for java 1.6 is a good idea. Even it's
> extended support will end this year (
>
We're discussing some potential approaches to getting smooth upgrades from
3.4 to 3.5 on the issue ZOOKEEPER-3056 (thanks, Michael, for creating it).
A few ideas have been proposed so far and I'm happy to see more
perspectives represented there.
As one way of unblocking those who need an upgrade
Github user abhishek-chouhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/541
@anmolnar Sorry for the delay. Have written a test case for this. Do have a
look.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brian Nixon updated ZOOKEEPER-3056:
---
Attachment: snapshot.0
> Fails to load database with missing snapshot file but valid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Han reassigned ZOOKEEPER-3007:
--
Assignee: lujie
> Potential NPE in ReferenceCountedACLCache#deserialize
>
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1851/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 91.88 KB...]
CONFLICT (content):
I have limited bandwidth recently so it would take a while before I can get
back to ZOOKEEPER-2184 (for master/3.5 version). That however should not
block 3.4.13 release.
I am preparing the release candidate for 3.4.13 release, will send out
email to dev list for vote soon.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Han resolved ZOOKEEPER-2184.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.5.5)
(was:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1852/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 91.88 KB...]
CONFLICT (content):
+1 on dropping JDK 1.6 support for branch-3.4.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Brian Nixon
wrote:
> +1 for discontinuing support for jdk1.6
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Norbert Kalmar <
> nkal...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > In my opinion terminating support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16519988#comment-16519988
]
Michael Han commented on ZOOKEEPER-1634:
I think the requirement is still valid and there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Han reopened ZOOKEEPER-2184:
> Zookeeper Client should re-resolve hosts when connection attempts fail
>
34 matches
Mail list logo
